LipeJJ said:
Going by this logic, you can't count even remasters/ports of older generations on Xbox One. lol |
What are you talking about? lol
LipeJJ said:
Going by this logic, you can't count even remasters/ports of older generations on Xbox One. lol |
What are you talking about? lol
Every indie game is on Nintendo Switch. Plus, Nintendo itself releases tons of cash grabs every month that most people don't even notice.
Megiddo said: Likely because Nintendo fans are a lot more diehard fans that will scour every singe indie title released on the eShop and will add it to the Wikipedia page, whereas fans of other consoles really don't care as much about updating a Wikipedia page. Does Steam have all 20,000+ titles released on the platform on its Wikipedia page? I doubt it. |
Is this serious post!? Do you relly think Switch fans are buying every Indie game just to be added to Wikipedia page!? :D
Asumption that has much more sense is that because Switch offers full handheld and full home console mods, indies game have higher value for plenty of people on Switch compared to PS4 or XB1.
Miyamotoo said:
Is this serious post!? Do you relly think Switch fans are buying every Indie game just to be added to Wikipedia page!? :D Asumption that has much more sense is that because Switch offers full handheld and full home console mods, indies game have higher value for plenty of people on Switch compared to PS4 or XB1. |
Why do you think they would have to buy the game to add it to the Wikipedia page and not say, just see it in the shop? I don't have a Nintendo device with an eShop, but I have to assume you are able to browse and see the names of software available.
This is just about Wikipeida. Wikipedia is edited by users. If there are active users who want to edit the page then the content will be more robust. Not sure if you've learned this lesson yet, but Wikipedia is an absolutely terrible source for any sort of credible information.
Megiddo said:
Why do you think they would have to buy the game to add it to the Wikipedia page and not say, just see it in the shop? I don't have a Nintendo device with an eShop, but I have to assume you are able to browse and see the names of software available. This is just about Wikipeida. Wikipedia is edited by users. If there are active users who want to edit the page then the content will be more robust. Not sure if you've learned this lesson yet, but Wikipedia is an absolutely terrible source for any sort of credible information. |
My bad, I missed your point.
On other hand, every game (including Indie) derves to be mentioned in list of available games for every platform.
dx11332sega said: I checked wikipedia Nintendo already has 1000 games already How long until it surpasses Xbox One then PS4 . I dont think PS4 had that much software in 1 year and few months? How is Nintendo recieving large amount of games? If this keeps up it'll have more games than Xbox One next year ? And I love Xbox alot.. I also noticed like Nintendo recieves like 3x more eshop games than Xbox One games every month. |
So, still less games than the OUYA according to Wikipedia
“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”
- George Orwell, ‘1984’
Just so we are all clear... we are counting numbers list on Wikipedia as a source?
SpokenTruth said:
That "Nintendo Seal of Quality" was never about game quality. It's more like the UL. It simply meant the game or device had passed physical and electrical quality controls and would work with the Nintendo console. |
Never? http://gaming.wikia.com/wiki/Nintendo_Seal_of_Quality