I think he is talking about hybrid consoles replacing stationary consoles. 

Yes he was, or cellphones replacing all...

Yet, a lot of us would be happier with a better and cheaper option still plugged to our tv.

Wii attach rate: 9.54

PS3 attach rate: 11.21

How on earth is that "a lot lower"?

And the fact that most of the sold games were first party is a good thing... Much more profit for Nintendo compared to Sony or Microsoft...

And PS3 also had a lot of bundled software, so don't even bother using that argument.

Have you ignored the part that I said the last time I checked tie ratio it was under 8?

And the bundle, Wii had other bundles, the point is that at least each one had Wii Sport, when bundling started it had a others included. We are only talking official bundles.

And yes, good for Nintendo... funny that you said that, because what is better for Nintendo doesn't mean what is the best for all. A platform where Nintendo get most sales and other doesn't have success help no one, even more when we go to that discussion that 3rd parties hate Nintendo and boycott it.

It has been that number for many years now.

PS3 also had official bundles, stop using god damn excuses.

And if third party developers/publishers want to compete with Nintendo then they should start making better games. Even during the SNES days, when Nintendo had the best third party support, first party games dominated the charts.

If 3rd party games are so bad why do they sell so much on other platforms and why does Nintendo fan complain they aren't released on their console?

Yes PS3 had official bundles. But nowhere would the amount oficially bundle compare to Wii Sport alone, much less when considering other bundles that would basically equate what PS3 and X360 had.

And if the number was 8 for several years my bad, because I remember the SW sales around 750M not near 1B.

The blue ocean strategy was made there home console line, which were not selling to there satisfactory, they felt they couldn't compete with sony, so they looked for a new audience, when the heck was there handheld line about blue ocean? there handhelds always old great, 3ds sold very good but not great for nintendo, so there stepping there game, and going the sony route with there handheld, where it can be more then handheld.   

Soundwave is right, a blue ocean strategy is not needed for success ...

A blue ocean stops being a blue ocean once every demographic and markets are catered to ...

There's no reason to believe why mobile devices couldn't cater to former customers of Nintendo's non-traditional franchises such as Brain Age, Nintendogs or even Wii Sports with alternate reality functionality (gyms are also competitors too) and it could even extend to other simulation games too like Animal Crossing ...

The problem with Soundwave's entire theory is the notion that a console can sustain itself on hardcore fans alone. That's never the case. Most of the most successful consoles of all time like the PlayStation and DS, reached those insane 100m+ numbers because they appealed to audiences outside of what we consider "gamers". So this notion that Nintendo can banish all of their casual series, even games like Animal Crossing to just smartdevices is unhealthy for their business.

Plus, it's delusional to think the Switch only appeals to the "core gamer", when the console was designed to be friendly and accessible to those who don't even play home console games. Now, I will say that Nintendo's strategy is different from the Wii in that Nintendo is no long using a dedicated home console to introduce people to Video Games as a medium, that job has been taken by Smartphones. But you'd be a fool to think their overall creative and commercial phillosophy from the past 10 years has changed with the Switch. 

I do not use vgchartz numbers because I have never found them reliable. This site also has Wii's numbers higher than any other site I searched but we can use your numbers. I used this site's information from my google search: http://vgsales.wikia.com/wiki/Software_tie_ratio

However, I will not argue the numbers you provided because you have delivered what I asked. All I asked was for proof of your claims. Even if you are correct, it is a less than two game per console difference; hardly enough to justify your position. Also, you never showed me any information that proves the console sales dropped so badly that it proved the point you were trying to make. Even by the numbers you are using, your position is unsupported.