By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Alkibiádēs said:
DonFerrari said:

Have you ignored the part that I said the last time I checked tie ratio it was under 8?

And the bundle, Wii had other bundles, the point is that at least each one had Wii Sport, when bundling started it had a others included. We are only talking official bundles.

And yes, good for Nintendo... funny that you said that, because what is better for Nintendo doesn't mean what is the best for all. A platform where Nintendo get most sales and other doesn't have success help no one, even more when we go to that discussion that 3rd parties hate Nintendo and boycott it.

It has been that number for many years now.

PS3 also had official bundles, stop using god damn excuses.

And if third party developers/publishers want to compete with Nintendo then they should start making better games. Even during the SNES days, when Nintendo had the best third party support, first party games dominated the charts.

If 3rd party games are so bad why do they sell so much on other platforms and why does Nintendo fan complain they aren't released on their console?

Yes PS3 had official bundles. But nowhere would the amount oficially bundle compare to Wii Sport alone, much less when considering other bundles that would basically equate what PS3 and X360 had.

And if the number was 8 for several years my bad, because I remember the SW sales around 750M not near 1B.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."