Sigh. All but 1 were objective factual statements. 

1. I said the last 2 attackers here in the UK were born in the UK. They weren't immigrants. Factual statement.

2. There have been more Right wing terrorist attacks in the US in the past 10 years than there have been Islamic terrorist attacks. Factual statement. 

3. A watch list is meaningless because it obviously doesn't prevent terrorist attacks. The last 2 attackers here were on watchlists and it didn't do anything. Some facts behind it but watchlists being meaningless is my opinion as it doesn't prevent anything. 

4. I said the mosque of the manchester attacker reported him to the authorities for extremism. That is a factual statement.

You've made 0 points here. *facepalm gif*

1. No. That last bit you said immigration wasn't a problem. It is. Unvetted immigration without encouraging them to intragrate into the society they're migrating to is what is leading 2nd or 3rd generation immigrants becoming extremists. 

2. There has but it's alot less than terrorist attacks attempted but failed by radicalized muslims in the US. Anyway, you were trying say that islamic terrorism isn't a problem in the us compared to right wing terrorists. That's something only an apologist would say.

3. Again something only an apologist would say. Watch lists is a part of intelligence gathering which could lead up to preventing terrorist acts because you were watching them. Terrorist acts that are prevented never reach the news but do happen alot.

the chairman of the House homeland security committee heralded US successes against “over 60” would-be terrorist attacks by “Isis followers” in the last year.        https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/19/chattanooga-isis-terror-plots-homeland-security 

4. You were talking about that mosque and others. "Their mosque's and others in their community reported them to the authorities under suspicions of extremism, that's why they were on a watch list." 

By Christianity I assume you mean the teaching of it, since the Bible has parts that promote killing, such as when Jesus said to kill those who would not follow him.

Luke 19:27:
"But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them--bring them here and kill them in front of me."
 

When talking about Christianity and Islam, there are those who chose to promote this violence, and those who do not.
I'd like to think that those who don't are the modern versions of those religions.
But as for extremists with an agenda, using religion is a powerful tool. I wish we lived in a wiorld where no one believed in religion. Even though we'd still have extremist violence, I think it would be significantly harder to recruit and motivate people without religion.

So what does Daesh do that the perfect example prophet Mohammed didn't do or wouldn't approve of?

By Christianity I assume you mean the teaching of it, since the Bible has parts that promote killing, such as when Jesus said to kill those who would not follow him.

Luke 19:27:
"But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them--bring them here and kill them in front of me."
 

When talking about Christianity and Islam, there are those who chose to promote this violence, and those who do not.
I'd like to think that those who don't are the modern versions of those religions.
But as for extremists with an agenda, using religion is a powerful tool. I wish we lived in a world where no one believed in religion. Even though we'd still have extremist violence, I think it would be significantly harder to recruit and motivate people without religion.

1. Their parent's aren't extremists. Vetting wouldn't have done anything to prevent them. Them becoming radicalised through online methods isn't an immigration problem, it's a, being an easily influenced idiot problem. 

2. I said Right wing terrorism is a bigger issue than Islamic terrorism in the US. Since when did I say neither was a problem. You're one of those people that when someone says they prefer pizza to burgers, think they automatically hate burgers. I can say Right wing terrorism is a bigger problem without saying Islamic terrorism isn't a problem.  Climate change and Poverty can be pressing issues at the same time.

3. That's true, we don't hear about foiled terrorist attacks that have been prevented from a watchlist. You're right about that. 

4. Yes THEIR mosuqes. IE. THE TERRORIST ATTACKERS MOSQUES. Not all mosques, jesus christ I don't need to spell out everything I'm not saying. Take my words for what they are. 

So what have we learned today?

Saying A is a bigger problem than B in county X doesn't mean that X shouldn't be concerned about B. 
Saying people that go to building AB did something good is not equal to saying Building CDEFGH are all good. 

Main point, stop adding extra clauses to my statements.

not in Europe.

SÄPO even here in Sweden said that the biggest threat to civilians here is an islamic terrorist attack by 300 ISIS sympathisers living in Sweden and many more who supports them. Right/left wing extremist comes far below.

I said in the US.

I'm sure the biggest threat to civilians in Sweden is heart disease as it's the number 1 cause of death but hey. 

(I'm only messing I know what you mean) 

Let's see:

Suicide

Oppression

Mistreatment of minorities

Mistreatment of women and children

Making children fight wars

Terrorism

Uncalled for violence

These are just the top of my head

So you're acting like an apologist because you keep trying to counter everything people are saying about Islam. I only tried to point that out but no, you won't see how what you're saying over and over again could be seen that way. You're either one or you're not but you're definitely acting like one.