quezkatolen said:
ArchangelMadzz said:
1. Their parent's aren't extremists. Vetting wouldn't have done anything to prevent them. Them becoming radicalised through online methods isn't an immigration problem, it's a, being an easily influenced idiot problem.
2. I said Right wing terrorism is a bigger issue than Islamic terrorism in the US. Since when did I say neither was a problem. You're one of those people that when someone says they prefer pizza to burgers, think they automatically hate burgers. I can say Right wing terrorism is a bigger problem without saying Islamic terrorism isn't a problem. Climate change and Poverty can be pressing issues at the same time.
3. That's true, we don't hear about foiled terrorist attacks that have been prevented from a watchlist. You're right about that.
4. Yes THEIR mosuqes. IE. THE TERRORIST ATTACKERS MOSQUES. Not all mosques, jesus christ I don't need to spell out everything I'm not saying. Take my words for what they are.
So what have we learned today?
Saying A is a bigger problem than B in county X doesn't mean that X shouldn't be concerned about B.
Saying people that go to building AB did something good is not equal to saying Building CDEFGH are all good.
Main point, stop adding extra clauses to my statements.
|
not in Europe.
SÄPO even here in Sweden said that the biggest threat to civilians here is an islamic terrorist attack by 300 ISIS sympathisers living in Sweden and many more who supports them. Right/left wing extremist comes far below.
|
I said in the US.
I'm sure the biggest threat to civilians in Sweden is heart disease as it's the number 1 cause of death but hey.
(I'm only messing I know what you mean)
