By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - America is a bigger threat to world peace than North Korea

VGPolyglot said:
KLXVER said:

Something worse would replace them if they were taken down by force. Im not sure what can be done at this point. Who or what could replace them?

The only way it'll work is if the people themselves take them down. I'm not sure if you know of my views, but I support a global socialist revolution.

How would that work?



Around the Network
FallingTitan said:

can't we all just nuke North korea off the map and be done with them.

and russia needs to shut up. at least usa warned them to get thier shitty 4000 troops out. they are backing a chemical weapon overlord in syria why can't usa just fight russia and korea at the same time

Well for one thing is Russia has more than enough Nuclear weapons to kill EVERY SINGLE PERSON in the USA within 20 minutes, and theres literally nothing the US could do about it.

Why are you in such a hurry to die, surely your life isn't that bad is it?



Ruler said:
KLXVER said:
I don't think so. Its not like the US is just bombing random places.

You just did, and you used weapons of mass destruction 

Yes. On ISIS. The guys who have taken credit for numerous terrorist attacks around the world?

At the end of this sentence is the world's tiniest violin playing for all the dead ISIS fighters.

Ljink96 said:
I have to agree, and it even scares me. We're using the largest non-nuclear bomb, something we haven't done in years, on 31 terrorists... who knows how many civilians have lost their lives at our hands. I said it once, I'll say it again, I don't stand by a single fucking thing Trump does.

Oh those poor, poor terrorists. Why can't we let them coordinate deliberate attacks on civilians in peace?



Ljink96 said:
I have to agree, and it even scares me. We're using the largest non-nuclear bomb, something we haven't done in years, on 31 terrorists... who knows how many civilians have lost their lives at our hands. I said it once, I'll say it again, I don't stand by a single fucking thing Trump does.

Imagine if ISIS was much bigger. It's scary to think we have such a man in charge of destroying countries.

 

if ISIS had more power, I wouldn't be surprised if he used more than the MOAB



GProgrammer said:
FallingTitan said:

can't we all just nuke North korea off the map and be done with them.

and russia needs to shut up. at least usa warned them to get thier shitty 4000 troops out. they are backing a chemical weapon overlord in syria why can't usa just fight russia and korea at the same time

Well for one thing is Russia has more than enough Nuclear weapons to kill EVERY SINGLE PERSON in the USA within 20 minutes, and theres literally nothing the US could do about it.

Why are you in such a hurry to die, surely your life isn't that bad is it?

Im guessing usa can't do it back to them and then some?

 

I dont like bullies and nkorea and russia are those. And no I'd survive. I have a secret.



Around the Network
KLAMarine said:
Ruler said:

You just did, and you used weapons of mass destruction 

Yes. On ISIS. The guys who have taken credit for numerous terrorist attacks around the world?

At the end of this sentence is the world's tiniest violin playing for all the dead ISIS fighters.

Ljink96 said:
I have to agree, and it even scares me. We're using the largest non-nuclear bomb, something we haven't done in years, on 31 terrorists... who knows how many civilians have lost their lives at our hands. I said it once, I'll say it again, I don't stand by a single fucking thing Trump does.

Oh those poor, poor terrorists. Why can't we let them coordinate deliberate attacks on civilians in peace?

Getting rid of 31 random terrorists doesn't outweigh what Trump has done recently. This will only make people view extremists as the righteous, thus making more terrorists. 



KLXVER said:
VGPolyglot said:

The only way it'll work is if the people themselves take them down. I'm not sure if you know of my views, but I support a global socialist revolution.

How would that work?

Well, it depends if it'll be a failed or successful one. A failed one would end up either with all socialist movements crushed or an authoritarian regime like the Soviet Union. A success would require the workers to take control of the workplace, and provided that they can fend off the violent counterrevolution by the elite, they'll eliminate the state and replace governing with a horizontal, bottom-up system that makes sure that everyone's needs are met.



VGPolyglot said:
KLXVER said:

How would that work?

Well, it depends if it'll be a failed or successful one. A failed one would end up either with all socialist movements crushed or an authoritarian regime like the Soviet Union. A success would require the workers to take control of the workplace, and provided that they can fend off the violent counterrevolution by the elite, they'll eliminate the state and replace governing with a horizontal, bottom-up system that makes sure that everyone's needs are met.

Well I think that would be more difficult to achieve in Russia and China than the US.



They all are dangerous. But don't try downplay NK just because US likes to dip their fingers into everything.



Of course they are, North Korea would never be a threat of any kind, they don't have the technological resources to wage war.