Lol no. What if someone is poor but is very intelligent intelligent so they cant vote? Also, I don't think folks 26 and over should be the only ones that have a say on who runs the country because it will also affect the younger people 18+.

No just a required Naivety Test. Since most voters seem to be easily duped into voting for candidates that pretend to have the same values as them.

That'd fall underneath racism, sexism, classism etc.

That's so 19th century, so cute (not that I'm a big fan of democracy, but your idea is just absurd).

Fuck off. Usually bad economic situations drive voting in the first place. It's enough we already have an electoral college between our vote in the first place and you think restricting it more is the answer? It's funny how all the anti-elites that voted in this election are all for elitism now once they're on the other side. Democracy indeed.

Are you sure you will be able to vote though?

To put an IQ limit is genuinely dumb, sorry, and not democratic at all.

About the need of having a certain level of income to vote... wow, this is unbelievable, you need to check your principles because this way of thinking is toxic and deeply absurd for this day and age.

A 'do-over' option would be brilliant. I don't care how long it takes to find a candidate people like, it should take a long time to find a world leader. 

That is true but people who do that probably wouldn't fit the requirement anyway.

Yeah 18 really is so young, you shouldn't be able to fight for your country until your brain has developed enough. 

Nope. Easier to have outright dictatorship.

It worked so well in the past when the nobility ran the world, didn't it?

The United States of America is NOT a democracy, it's a republic. Any of you misses that shouldn't be voting.