By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Nintendo Switch’s Bundled Joy-Con Grip Won’t Charge the Controllers

Not a real issue imo.



Intel Core i7 8700K | 32 GB DDR 4 PC 3200 | ROG STRIX Z370-F Gaming | RTX 3090 FE| Crappy Monitor| HTC Vive Pro :3

Around the Network
Intrinsic said:
RolStoppable said:

I am just making an issue more complicated than it needs to be, playing along with you.

Play Switch, end session, pull off Joy-cons from grip, slide Joy-cons on the Switch console. That's the simple way.

No you aren't you are ignoring a specific usage case scenario simply because it won't affect someone like you. You are also ignoring a blatant design flaw (in truth i can't even call it a design flaw cause they did this on purpose which is why they have a version of the grip they sell that supports what I am asking for; which makes this worse)

If you can't dispute what is being said, its really a messed up discussion tactic to instead resort to dismissing it. 

Here are the facts..... if you buy the switch, as is... its impossible to charge the joycons and play on you TV at the same time. If you want to be able to do that for whatever your reason then you will have to spend another $30 in addition to the purchase of your switch. Something that if you do will make something that comes with your switch completely redundant (the USB portless grip)

Take me for instance, I have a projector. And all my appliances are basically in a cabinet in another room. I could try explaing how this setup works for my PS4, but no need for that. I'll just say for someone like me; if nintendo doesn't allow me download all my games? No buy. If i do buy, then I must spend another $30 just to be able to charge my controllers without having to go to the console.

Now all that, and this whole thread could have been avoided if nintendo had just thought to put a USB port on the joycon grip........ actually, they did think about it. They chose to sell that thought seperately.

That's a very niche set-up.

The switch is not meant for that set-up. The switch is meant for being able to quickly grab the console and go on the move. Having the console tucked away in a closet defeats basically teh whole premise of the console.

And hearing that set-up, I'm guaranteeing you are making a mountain out of an ant hill. There is 0% chance you are not purchasing a Gamepad pro, or whatever its called to game. You are not going to be playing with these joycons.



HollyGamer said:
Jranation said:

What if the Switch is charging using the USb, not the dock. Does that charge the Joycons? 

I guess it will charge it 

Curious on Joy-con charging. Does it charge if you remove the switch from teh dock? Or do they only charge when docked?

How much of the battery life is affected if it does charge the joycons when connected then? I mean imagine playing Zelda on teh Switch with joycons that were dead before hookng up. Not only is the game draining the batttery, but now the controllers are draining the system as well.

I'm guessing they don't charge unless docked.



dahuman said:
thismeintiel said:

Considering Sony was losing a couple hundred dollars per unit, that's not exactly the same thing.  Still, that price was too damn high and was mostly Sony's fault for having such expensive HW.  But guess what?  Sony learned from that mistake and thus we have the PS4.  Looking at the Switch, what exactly has Nintendo learned?  I'd say absolutely nothing.  In fact, I'd say they've gotten worse.

They still overestimate the value of their SW, for proof look at VC and what they are offering for the games you can borrow for a month if you use their network.  They still keep chasing that Wii dream, even though late last gen and this one proved motion control was basically dead.  They were talking BS after the 3DS about no more expensive Nintendo HW, then months later launch the Wii U, with its last gen HW, for $349 (this was for the Deluxe, the only model that was at all appealing).  Now, they're asking $299 for a tablet that basically has the same innards of the $199 Shield (which even that should be cheaper, now).  But, since it doesn't come with a game, not even 1, 2 Switch, they are asking $360 for it.  If you want 2 players, which I'm sure most people want, that'll be $440.  If you don't want to keep swapping out Joycons, you need the extra charger, so $470.  Damn, we're getting pretty damn close to that PS3 price.  Hmm.  And I haven't even added in the price of internet.

If Nintendo wanted to actually play it smart this gen, they could have done the EXACT same thing, only using more readily available mobile chips.  Even using more top of the line chips, plus a 6.2" 1080p screen, they could have got this thing on shelves easily for $199.

Nintendo has learned to make a better controller is about it and that made the price super shitty to a lot of people lol. Impressions are coming in and people that were kinda shitting on the joycons all like them a lot after hands on, but agree with me on that the HD rumble can be gimmicky unless it's used in a smart way in a lot of games. I don't think people realize just how much tech is inside controllers that are that small. I'm definitely not going to pay for online unless I see real value in it, that's why I eventually sold my 360 during last gen and never paid for PS+ and still don't have a PS4(X1 is pointless now if you have a PC.) The only reason NS doesn't fall into that category for me yet is because of the portability and local multiplayer potentials or there is noway in hell I'd have pre-ordered it. If the online is shit, I simply won't pay for it. You also don't need another set of joycons to play 2 player in most games as far as I can see so far, it's already beend confirmed that those things are comfortable even in big ass hands, I only pre-ordered another set with a charging grip because I'm lazy as fuck(1 pair stays on Switch for on the road and the other pair will be my primary home use ones) and I have money to spend, I still think the HD rumble is gimmicky as fuck and that jacked the price up but people seem to like it so meh.

Also, there is noway in hell they can get that shit to 199$ with the dock and those controllers, maybe without the dock and power and barely break even if you take into account the R&D costs, just think about how much power bricks/docking station cost for laptops, they'd loose too much money, and I don't see a problem with 720p at that size, 1080p would be really fucking dumb from an engineering perspective, phone vendors are basically at the mega pixel war(phone cameras) again, only this time, it's screen resolution, which put false ideas in people's heads that everything needs to be 1080p+ or 4k or it's not good enough, standard advertisement tactics, don't fall victim to it.

IMO, it's a worse controller. Too much focus on unwanted motion controls. Have to buy a separate piece to use it as a normal controller and charge it. The D-pad, something Nintendo is known for, is now shit. And maybe simplistic games won't need another set of Joycons, but anything else is most likely going to require two sets. Otherwise gameplay will be very limited.

Yes, they could. If I can get a 10.1" tablet with a higher resolution than 1080p and decent specs for less than $200, Nintendo can sure as hell pump this sucker out with a 1080p 6.2" screen for $200, especially if they went with less obscure chips.  Hell, the Chinese tablet they ripped off is the same price as the Switch, and that comes with pretty good specs, a 800p glassesless 3D screen, and a rotatable 8MP camera.  And since there's nothing special about the dock, they could have sold it separately for $20-$30. Nintendo is price gouging, no way to deny it.



Intrinsic said:

NS tech guy : Ok, so thast the grip..... but wait we have to put in a USB C port in there so people can charge the joycons and game on the big screen at the same time.

NS Suit: Yh thats true, but fuck it.... make a seperate grip so they can buy that too. 

NS tech guy: great idea!! that would cost us all of $5, we can charge them $10 for the grip with the USB passthrough.

NS Suit: Errrr, lets just make it $30.

Nintendo Fan: Yup,  dont be stupid you are just hating on nintendo. If you want to charge the joycons just connect it to the console when its docked. Or just buy the charging grip if its that important to you, its only $30.

NS tech guy : Ok, so thast the grip..... but wait we have to put in a USB C port in there so people can charge the joycons and game on the big screen at the same time.

NS Suit: No.. very few people will use this..  No need to add extra cost and tech

NS tech guy: Some hardcore gamers  just pass out and forget to charge the joycons

NS Suit: Errrr, Ok make a version that has a USB C port.. We sell em seperatly.. But they will have to cost 30$.. becourse we will not sell many of them  

Nintendo Fan: Yup,  Nice Price.. Thanksfully Nintendo did'nt include things i dont need.. and could sell the console for 299$

Fixed...



Around the Network
irstupid said:
HollyGamer said:

I guess it will charge it 

Curious on Joy-con charging. Does it charge if you remove the switch from teh dock? Or do they only charge when docked?

How much of the battery life is affected if it does charge the joycons when connected then? I mean imagine playing Zelda on teh Switch with joycons that were dead before hookng up. Not only is the game draining the batttery, but now the controllers are draining the system as well.

I'm guessing they don't charge unless docked.

I believe they will charge the joycon while it attached to the main system , but the answer for whether it will charge while on mobile mode or even on sleep mode or turn off mode unfortunately  i don't have any clue at all.  



So....I won't try to excuse this...but I hope people in here realize that just because this is an inconvenience to you...it might not be an inconvenience to someone else. Having this feature is a definite plus...but as stated in the thread, there are simple work-arounds, and it may or may not be a big deal depending on your setup.

For my personal setup, charging the PS4 controller is basically impossible unless I move right up to the TV screen. Yes, I realize I can buy an extension cable, or simply a longer cord...but that's still an added expense, which seems to be an absolute crime based on the comments in this thread. The same goes for my Bluetooth headphones. For some reason, Sony decided I can't use these on my PS4, so I was forced to buy a $40 dongle to use them. Another added expense, and another inconvenience.

Now...I realize this doesn't excuse Nintendo from doing the same thing...and maybe it makes sense for me to make threads complaining about Sony not including these extras right out of the box. Unfortunately...I don't expect that. No setup is the same, and I don't expect every console maker to appeal to my every need, even if it's something that seems incredibly obvious.

Anyways, and this goes for everyone, drop the rude remarks, drop the condescension, drop the general fandom attacks. If this is a big deal to you...okay. If it isn't...also okay. But don't try to pretend that this is something everyone needs to care about equally. Because this obviously isn't a problem exclusive to Nintendo.



NNID: Zephyr25 / PSN: Zephyr--25 / Switch: SW-4450-3680-7334

thismeintiel said:

Considering Sony was losing a couple hundred dollars per unit, that's not exactly the same thing.  Still, that price was too damn high and was mostly Sony's fault for having such expensive HW.  But guess what?  Sony learned from that mistake and thus we have the PS4.  Looking at the Switch, what exactly has Nintendo learned?  I'd say absolutely nothing.  In fact, I'd say they've gotten worse.

I could be getting this info wrong, but I heard that the reason the PS3 was so expensive was that it had a blueray in it when bluerays were expensive to manufacture.  For its price, the power WAS not that great (assuming this is true).  It's kind of an inequivalent comparison due to the fact that the Switch isn't being upped in price dramatically over highly expensive hardware that is irrelevant to gaming for the consumer.  (Bluerays may have had more storage for that time, but it's not what people look at when purchasing consoles).  



thismeintiel said:
dahuman said:

Nintendo has learned to make a better controller is about it and that made the price super shitty to a lot of people lol. Impressions are coming in and people that were kinda shitting on the joycons all like them a lot after hands on, but agree with me on that the HD rumble can be gimmicky unless it's used in a smart way in a lot of games. I don't think people realize just how much tech is inside controllers that are that small. I'm definitely not going to pay for online unless I see real value in it, that's why I eventually sold my 360 during last gen and never paid for PS+ and still don't have a PS4(X1 is pointless now if you have a PC.) The only reason NS doesn't fall into that category for me yet is because of the portability and local multiplayer potentials or there is noway in hell I'd have pre-ordered it. If the online is shit, I simply won't pay for it. You also don't need another set of joycons to play 2 player in most games as far as I can see so far, it's already beend confirmed that those things are comfortable even in big ass hands, I only pre-ordered another set with a charging grip because I'm lazy as fuck(1 pair stays on Switch for on the road and the other pair will be my primary home use ones) and I have money to spend, I still think the HD rumble is gimmicky as fuck and that jacked the price up but people seem to like it so meh.

Also, there is noway in hell they can get that shit to 199$ with the dock and those controllers, maybe without the dock and power and barely break even if you take into account the R&D costs, just think about how much power bricks/docking station cost for laptops, they'd loose too much money, and I don't see a problem with 720p at that size, 1080p would be really fucking dumb from an engineering perspective, phone vendors are basically at the mega pixel war(phone cameras) again, only this time, it's screen resolution, which put false ideas in people's heads that everything needs to be 1080p+ or 4k or it's not good enough, standard advertisement tactics, don't fall victim to it.

IMO, it's a worse controller. Too much focus on unwanted motion controls. Have to buy a separate piece to use it as a normal controller and charge it. The D-pad, something Nintendo is known for, is now shit. And maybe simplistic games won't need another set of Joycons, but anything else is most likely going to require two sets. Otherwise gameplay will be very limited.

Yes, they could. If I can get a 10.1" tablet with a higher resolution than 1080p and decent specs for less than $200, Nintendo can sure as hell pump this sucker out with a 1080p 6.2" screen for $200, especially if they went with less obscure chips.  Hell, the Chinese tablet they ripped off is the same price as the Switch, and that comes with pretty good specs, a 800p glassesless 3D screen, and a rotatable 8MP camera.  And since there's nothing special about the dock, they could have sold it separately for $20-$30. Nintendo is price gouging, no way to deny it.

I mean sure, you can get Chinese shit that feels cheap and works like horse shit for 200 bucks, but remember, you are also getting shit games and a battery that will drop it's charge % to nothing in like 1-2 years, and that's assuming if your charging tip is still functioning by then and haven't snapped off already, or, you can get a Nintendo Switch with controllers that actually doesn't feel like cheap plastic, which is already confirmed by most hands on videos so far. The fair comparison is about the line of mmmmm...... do you want to buy a PS4 or a Wii U right now? I mean, go ahead and buy that 200 dollar shit Chinese tablet if you think that'd make your point stronger, which I highly doubt would be the case. I'm also willing to bet they'll come out with a dpad left joycon down the road, just watch.



dahuman said:
thismeintiel said:

IMO, it's a worse controller. Too much focus on unwanted motion controls. Have to buy a separate piece to use it as a normal controller and charge it. The D-pad, something Nintendo is known for, is now shit. And maybe simplistic games won't need another set of Joycons, but anything else is most likely going to require two sets. Otherwise gameplay will be very limited.

Yes, they could. If I can get a 10.1" tablet with a higher resolution than 1080p and decent specs for less than $200, Nintendo can sure as hell pump this sucker out with a 1080p 6.2" screen for $200, especially if they went with less obscure chips.  Hell, the Chinese tablet they ripped off is the same price as the Switch, and that comes with pretty good specs, a 800p glassesless 3D screen, and a rotatable 8MP camera.  And since there's nothing special about the dock, they could have sold it separately for $20-$30. Nintendo is price gouging, no way to deny it.

I mean sure, you can get Chinese shit that feels cheap and works like horse shit for 200 bucks, but remember, you are also getting shit games and a battery that will drop it's charge % to nothing in like 1-2 years, and that's assuming if your charging tip is still functioning by then and haven't snapped off already, or, you can get a Nintendo Switch with controllers that actually doesn't feel like cheap plastic, which is already confirmed by most hands on videos so far. The fair comparison is about the line of mmmmm...... do you want to buy a PS4 or a Wii U right now? I mean, go ahead and buy that 200 dollar shit Chinese tablet if you think that'd make your point stronger, which I highly doubt would be the case. I'm also willing to bet they'll come out with a dpad left joycon down the road, just watch.

Ah, so you predict more nickel and diming down the road? I guess we agree on something.