By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Nintendo Switch Presentation - Rating and your impressions?

 

Rating?

10 65 8.72%
 
9 46 6.17%
 
8 99 13.29%
 
7 100 13.42%
 
6 87 11.68%
 
5 97 13.02%
 
4 78 10.47%
 
3 71 9.53%
 
2 28 3.76%
 
1 74 9.93%
 
Total:745
Acevil on 13 January 2017
SvennoJ said:
Acevil said:

Wait wha? Why? 

Crappy exchange rate plus 13% tax. It's CAD 400 here + CAD 80 for Zelda.
The grey version is sold out already anyway, blue red version is still available at best buy. (due to the ugly faded red and blue shade probably)

PS4 + game on day 1 was CAD 518 as the games were still CAD 60, Plus a bunch of smaller digital games carried over from ps3 and Resogun was cheap, how times have changed!

Damn that is how much it will cost me, I never fully did the math yet. Also PS4 on launch was actually same price as USD, at least for me. 



 

Around the Network
Low78wagon on 13 January 2017

If anyone gave it a 10 they are in denial. I can understand some people liking the presentation but a 10.....really?

Same goes for a 1 unless you feel like nintendo bent you over as a fan and gave you the shaft.



oniyide on 14 January 2017
Kai_Mao said:
oniyide said:

I think the issue people have is a lot of those games seem to be ports and of old games at that. Thats not gonna really set a fire under most people to buy one at launch especially at that price. ANd we can tout Zelda all we want but as good as that game looks it was supposed to come out years ago for a older system, its still a port itself.

Let's not pretend that most of the launch games from PS4 and Xbone weren't ports or enhanced from the 360/PS3 versions. Yes we know BoTW is initially a Wii U game, but do a majority of people know that or care about that? Twilight Princess (as Pavolink likes to point out, though I'm not sure if that's necessarily true) was a big hit and a staple on the Wii's launch and yet it was originally a GameCube game. Plus, not everyone has played these games. Zelda could've come out a year or two ago but it appears to have benefited well with a more stable performance on the Switch.

And they're spacing out their first party titles it seems. Mario is a great holiday title. Having Xenoblade and FE Musou near the end of the year and having Splatoon 2 as the summer title like the original. Mario Kart 8 Deluxe is just a month after launch. And we've still have yet to see everything for the Switch. And Arms and 1-2 Switch could be interesting games. I know people want to write them off like Wii Sports or Nintendogs, but I'm more interested in, at least, Arms due to the Treehouse gameplay. Again, nothing is set in stone, especially the fate of the Switch.

Sure but they also had some original games in there as well, and we are talking about SOny and MS where people know that the games are going to come. Ninty isnt afforded that benefit of doubt and having a bunch of games that anyone who is interested in would have already played isnt helping. Rayman? that thing even got a Vita port.



sethnintendo on 14 January 2017
Low78wagon said:

 

Same goes for a 1 unless you feel like nintendo bent you over as a fan and gave you the shaft.

Actually I kind of feel that way right now.  I gave it a 5 though but that wasn't even based on presentation.  It was just based on the Mario and a few other game videos I saw and then subtracted by all the crap in the presentation.  I only viewed the presentation for about 30 seconds for the online part.  Looked boring.  I don't want balloons and clowns running around the stage (having an EA rep on stage might be considered this) but hell I could probably hear myself jack off in presentation room.



sethnintendo on 14 January 2017
SvennoJ said:



Damn that launch line-up is embarrassing compared to the PSVR launch line-up.

They probably should have just waited till holiday 2017.  No excuse to have a shitty launch line up when Wii U and 3DS have been on life support for awhile.  Seems like they didn't learn shit from their bad 3DS and Wii U launch.



Around the Network
Low78wagon on 14 January 2017
sethnintendo said:
SvennoJ said:



Damn that launch line-up is embarrassing compared to the PSVR launch line-up.

They probably should have just waited till holiday 2017.  No excuse to have a shitty launch line up when Wii U and 3DS have been on life support for awhile.  Seems like they didn't learn shit from their bad 3DS and Wii U launch.

I went ahead and pre ordered one just because but I agree holiday 2017 release would be much better as far as games go but the only thing that sucks about that is Scorpio would steal some of its thunder. 



Ruler on 15 January 2017
curl-6 said:

Extremely mixed, 5/10

The highs were magnificent, the lows catastrophic.

Mario Odyssey and Xenoblade 2 look amazing, and Splatoon 2 instead of just a port of the original is a pleasant surprise.

But just about everything else was terrible, especially the price and paid online.

thats a vallied argument but didnt you choose the 360 over the PS3?



Why i left PC gaming

 

(2015) Question for PS4 owners: if the situation would be reverse? would you still play on PS4?

(2015) The "I don't care PS4 is the most powerful console" thread

Pachofilauri on 15 January 2017

I can't believe people actually like it. It was the worst presentation ever!! The only few good things were the New Mario, Xenoblade 2 and probably Octopath Traveler, the rest was mediocre. We nintendo Fans tend to be proud that our games despite the numerous sequels are one of a kind and games like COD are actually copy paste but look at splatoon 2, it's the same thing!! they could announce 6vs6 mode, free for all, a longer campaign and many other things but no, they want us to pay $60 for what could have been a 15-20 DLC.

Second, if you don't have something to show, then don't make an appearance. I love no more heroes, and Shin Megami Tensei but if you don't have a fucking trailer then don't waste our time with something you can tweet about.