By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Carl2291 said:
Kerotan said:
I have another problem I'd like to have the mods address. What's the story with posters who fill threads with one liners that are basically the equivalent of saying "+1" but in different ways? It's basically spam. Is this allowed?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8563868

No problem.  When the mods are finished watching their movies feel free to get back to me :)



Around the Network
Kerotan said:
Carl2291 said:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8563868

No problem.  When the mods are finished watching their movies feel free to get back to me :)

Spam, which is multiple replies in a row without any substance and replies that have nothing to do with the topic at hand, is not allowed.

When the user you have a problem with is going against the above statement, feel free to complain about it.



                            

Carl2291 said:
Kerotan said:

No problem.  When the mods are finished watching their movies feel free to get back to me :)

Spam, which is multiple replies in a row without any substance and replies that have nothing to do with the topic at hand, is not allowed.

When the user you have a problem with is going against the above statement, feel free to complain about it.

Roger.  Busy now but I'll get around to it eventually. 



Can users be banned for arguing a lot? Like if you're just an argumentative person? Even if you aren't breaking the rules? Almost like a no-nuisance law or something. People like me or Fatslob



CGI-Quality said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Can users be banned for arguing a lot? Like if you're just an argumentative person? Even if you aren't breaking the rules? Almost like a no-nuisance law or something. People like me or Fatslob

Nah. If it became repetitive and without substance? Perhaps. But if it's just a drawn out, but reasonable, argument - I wouldn't have an issue with it. 

What about that reason Playstation thread were I was genuinely wondering what the point of the thread was? I can't tell if that would be an exception or not because I couldn't read the room.



Around the Network

Can I get a mod's opinion on whether or not AngryLittleAlchemist's and NATO's current avatars are inappropriate for VGChartz?



StarDoor said:
Can I get a mod's opinion on whether or not AngryLittleAlchemist's and NATO's current avatars are inappropriate for VGChartz?

NO DON'T

 

PLEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASEE

 

actually I think NATO's is crossing a line

 

but mine is fine  



RolStoppable said:
StarDoor said:
Can I get a mod's opinion on whether or not AngryLittleAlchemist's and NATO's current avatars are inappropriate for VGChartz?

The mod team doesn't crack down on lewd avatars until there are too many half-naked dudes around. It's at that point that we get complaints from users, because their girlfriends think they are latent gays for browsing this website.

That can't be true. I've seen like 4 different mods with naked men boobies as their profile pics



AngryLittleAlchemist said:
RolStoppable said:

The mod team doesn't crack down on lewd avatars until there are too many half-naked dudes around. It's at that point that we get complaints from users, because their girlfriends think they are latent gays for browsing this website.

That can't be true. I've seen like 4 different mods with naked men boobies as their profile pics

I don't think it's a big deal. There's people with two guys kissing as their profile pic.



RolStoppable said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

That can't be true. I've seen like 4 different mods with naked men boobies as their profile pics

That mods have such profile pictures is the reason why such profile pictures begin to spread in the first place.

Rol, there's enough room for lewd avatars of every variety

Aside from Nato's, but the rest of us are pure.