I wouldn't think Bethesda would commit the sin of giving the idea that Switch is more powerful than it really is. EA or Ubisoft would. But I wouldn't expect that from Bethesda.

At a later date, before the March launch, we'll be talking about things like exact launch date, and of course, the games. You shouldn't assume what you saw on the video represents actual game footage and further specifics on first-party games will be provided later.

Apparently Nintendo could do that:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2016-10-24-behind-the-scenes-of-nintendos-switch-reveal-video

We "shouldn't assume" that the game footage they showed in the video is actually game footage :D

First: Android not on NX: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/06/02/will-nintendos-nx-adopt-android-company-says-no/

Second: If you would have any clue about the last 20 years of Apple's company-history you would know they don't license their operating systems. period.

Third: 3DS used ARM. In your logic Nintendo would put Android on the 3DS. Didn't happen because it doesn't make sense.

That could be said because some of what's shown could be prototypes built upon WiiU games rather than actual titles in develoment for Switch.

So I could see Nintendo doing that - but no way they'd strong-arm Bethesda to do that. Please.

Your whole argument "Anyone who saw version in the Switch trailer can tell it's the enhanced version that's also on XBO/PS4" falls apart and you still choose to ignore that, grasping to straws like "Bethesda wouldn't do that", "no way they'd strong-arm Bethesda to do that", "EA or Ubisoft would doo that, but not the holy Bethesda", blablabla.

Maybe you yourself are one of "these people" you laughed about:

End of story.

Don't waste my time with these "I'm rubber. You're glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you" replies.

Your whole argument "Anyone who saw version in the Switch trailer can tell it's the enhanced version that's also on XBO/PS4" falls apart and you still choose to ignore that, grasping to straws like "Bethesda wouldn't do that", "no way they'd strong-arm Bethesda to do that", "EA or Ubisoft would doo that, but not the holy Bethesda", blablabla.

Maybe you yourself are one of "these people" you laughed about:

End of story.

I really would rather not get involved in this argument since a lot of you are acting childish on some level, but he has a point.  Nintendo?  Strong arming Bethesda Softworks?  Please.  They couldn't get BethSoft to shake their hand on stage in 2011 when coming off the monster success of the Wii.  There's no way in hell they bullied BethSoft into showing a false representation of their game on the Switch,...

They wouldn't have to "strong-arm" or "bully" BethSoft to do anything. If they have an agreement that Nintendo is allowed to show a few seconds of Skyrim in that clip... why should BethSoft be against showing a scene which looks good?

It is a Win-Win-situation for both companies: Nintendo can show off the Switch and BethSoft can show off Skyrim. And BOTH companies have a backdoor / an excuse for later complaints that the Switch version doesn't look as good as in the trailer:

...especially when you take into account that Bethesda is one of the few companies that has consistently made the point of showing representative gameplay footage of their games.  

Bethesda ain't much better than the other big developers / publishers. Both Bethesda + id software have a lot of broken promises in their company histories (downgrades, performance problems, bugged software...).

Like it or not, the Skyrim footage on the Switch has significance and the version being the enhanced version - which it was - is also not by mistake.  We'll have to wait and see if it is the same version as the Xbone, but it's not vanilla.  

Like it or not, the current Switch teaser proves nothing about the graphical power of that console, neither in handheld mode nor in docking station mode. The game footage was implemented later into the video and they have their "not final, subject to change" backdoor. We'll have to wait and see if the Switch gets a Skyrim that can keep up with the XBO and/or PS4 version.

Oh, and Nintendo is also including their own footage in that "don't take these things as announcements" statements and let's face it, we all know that the Nintendo games in that footage are real, they ain't got time to dither about making fake games :P

I don't doubt that all the shown Nintendo games will be available on the Switch eventually. But the "they ain't got time for fake games" argument is pretty weak... f.e.: they have taken the time for the Zelda tech demo in 2011 and the "Super Mario 128" tech demo in 2000 and many other concepts or tech demos.