Quantcast
BattleField 1 is one of the worse performing tittles at 60fps on Consoles, runs at 620p in some cases! Awfull!

Forums - Gaming Discussion - BattleField 1 is one of the worse performing tittles at 60fps on Consoles, runs at 620p in some cases! Awfull!

Azzanation said:
Disgusting resolution.

Dont buy this game, no matter how good the gameplay, story or sound is. If those pixals fall below the standard this game is worthless and a waste of time. - Modern Gamer.

It's a great game.



Around the Network

Is that just Conquest that's experiencing those issues? I mainly play Campaign and traditional Team Deathmatch.



gtotheunit91 said:

Is that just Conquest that's experiencing those issues? I mainly play Campaign and traditional Team Deathmatch.

Yup its probably only conquest. I have been playing campaign,TDM,Domination and it runs well with the occasional frame drops.



Azzanation said:
Disgusting resolution.

Dont buy this game, no matter how good the gameplay, story or sound is. If those pixals fall below the standard this game is worthless and a waste of time. - Modern Gamer.

For how often i see this opinion mocked, i don't think I've ever sincerely seen someone claim the lack of good IQ makes a game "worthless" ("unplayable" being a common alternative used). Comments like this feel like they'd be better served in a straw field, rather than a gaming forum :p



Frame rate > resolution > everything else (esp. pointless effects the master race wank over)



Around the Network

V-r0cK said:

Hate is not misplaced to those that play enough EA games will actually understand. 

I'm not asking EA to make the game 1080p/60fps, but the least they can do is be on par with their competitors. 620p is a joke, that probably even a joke for last gen games.  As well EA put down Activison's CoD games but at least BO3 on XB1 can run at 900p.

I have EA Access, so I've played my share of their games. I've been playing EA games off and on since the '80s. I'm not a big fan of EA, nor am I a big critic of theirs. I don't think their games are best, nor worst.



Radek said:
walsufnir said:

 

Relax, it's only a video game. Your console is still the best of the best.

This has nothing to do with which console I think is better. If one console is more powerful than the other and this has been proven multiple times in the last 3 years it shouldn't perform worse in the same resolution. BF4, BF Hardline, Battlefront, Mirror's Edge Catalyst all 900p and better frame rate than Xbox version @  720p. I just hate unoptimized ports.

 

No bf 4 and hardlinr runs better on xbox with lower res



Nearly bought this on x one as well glad I didn't now. Ps4 version for me then.



Pemalite said:
WrathofTank said:

The truth is that if the same game sells on console and on pc, it will pretty much always have a much larger player base on console, including Overwatch.  I've have understood why Blizzard has focused so hard on Overwatch on PC when they have a much larger audience on console based on sales.

Because PC games are more profitable, PC games tend to have longer legs and PC games tend to be the platform used in allot of eSports events.

Every game Blizzard sells on PC, is 30% or more of a cut that doesn't go into Sony, Microsoft or Nintendo's pockets but goes to Blizzard instead.

PC Games tend to keep-on selling for decades. On consoles they tend to fall into obscurity after the initial release, StarCraft Brood Wars didn't hit 10~ million copies sold overnight for example, Diablo 3 PC outsold all console versions.

And eSports is the logical part, Overwatch is a very eSports centric game, mouse and keyboard is better for competitive players, the PC also allows for eSports organizations to have their own overlays and such.

The PC also doesn't charge for patches, so when Blizzard tests a new idea, they test/experiment with it on the PC first, because. You know. Money and all that.

A lot of your post has absolutely nothing to do with console vs PC, but a marketplace that Blizzard controls vs one that they do not.

I think you're way off on your sales legs comment. The truly great, meaningful games will sell well for over a decade. Even moreso now as the digital marketplaces have developed so much in PSN and XBL. Being on PC doesn't make something just start selling well over time. Your comment is also quite strange as the late port on consoles still pushed over 4 million combined with all of the horrid word of mouth that Blizzard got on release date.