By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Why are people calling for Trump to exit the race when Hilary has done just as appalling stuff?

SkepticallyMinded said:
Voting for Trump is like appointing a homeless man to be CEO of Google. Complete absence of credentials for the position, not to mention he's an idiot.

Weren't you the people who voted for a damned haberdasher? 



Around the Network
LadyJasmine said:

"job growth, economy growth, and social growth like never before"

Obama has created less jobs then Clinton and Reagan with a much higher population.



Economic growth has been sub 2% while it was avg well over 3.5% in the past.

 



Household wealth has hardly grown in the past decade compared to constant growth in the past.



All measures are below Clinton and Reagan.

They are up and it is a good news story but stop hyping things up like its a drake concert.

That sentence came out wrong. I should have said social growth like never before, economic growth and job growth. The never before part has to so with the next sentence where I am talking about two huge reforms that Obama succeeded in, that several administrations failed to get through, gay marriage and universal healthcare. Sure, things aren't perfect but he got the legislation to pass. But I admit, the economic growth and job growth has been a slow burn. But both are growing unlike what was happening in GWB's administration.



zero129 said:

If you want to see some of the stuff Hillary has done check out my thread here http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221184&page=1#. You guys wont be able to post in it till its re opened but your free to use any of it here. Is any head mods on that can re open it?. How do i check what mods are on again so i can pm one of them?.

Some of the things on that list are pure conjecture or blamings on things Bill Clinton did (Hillary's devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practice law for 'lying under oath' to a grand jury, followed by his subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.), but others I can agree show a definite flare for corruption.

Still, you have to admit that is a much smaller and pitiful list compared to:

http://quantum-displacement.tumblr.com/post/146015554444/anti-trump-masterpost

Like, really small and pitiful.

And I argue that it'd not be difficult to find a equal or larger list on most notable politicians in Washington of this day and age. Corruption is wide spread. That's the sad state we live in.



Machiavellian said:
Norris2k said:

For example, this. Basically, she defended a child rapist that she knew was guilty, that there were evidences again, and she just got him out of jail. And she laugh about it. Oh, and she had to show the raped girl was unreliable, so she built a story of her being a pathological liar. So, there is a woman that was raped as a child, her rapist never convicted, and her reputation destroyed, and that is because of Clinton's direct action. What did Trump that matches that ?

Actually that was bogus.  She did not defend him because she new he was guilty.  She defended him because it was her job and she was assigned to the case just like any lawyer.  Here is a counter to that article 

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/

You missed my point (perhaps the way I wrote it). My point is in bold, but I had to explain the background, and that is about defending a guy you say you know is guilty.

I know she was assigned, I have no problem with her being assigned to this case, and no problem with someone guilty having defense, first because that guilt has to be decided fairly, and even if proven guilty there are circumstances that need to be cleary explained by a lawyer to give a fair result. At the end of the day, the attorneys, included defense, are here to serve Justice. When I hear the record, justice was not served, and she just says it herself (and laugh...).



If you really, really want a rapist back in the White House, vote in hs wife. It's as simple as that.

Yes, thanks to our excellent 2-party system, the alternative is not that great either but at least the Trump will not try VERY HARD to start a nuke war with Russia and may not be serving the plutocrats and the crazy neocon militarists 100% of the time. But, sure, he did say some incorrect sex words about women 11 years ago.

Which is, I am sure, a lot worse than, let's say, Hillary-as-a-lawyer defending a child rapist who raped a 12 yr old into a coma. And that's Okay, it's what lawyers are supposed to do. What human lawers are NOT expected to do is give interviews a few years later and LAUGH about how they managed to get the guility as sin monster out of jail on technicalities and by exploiting the prosecutors' ineptitude.

So, absolutely, let's bring the rapist back into the WH and let's have his maniacal and incompetent wife who couldn't handle email control the nuke buttons and in charge of a million-plus army with a trillion dollar budget. All is going to be good. Trust her.



Around the Network
zero129 said:
danasider said:

Some of the things on that list are pure conjecture or blamings on things Bill Clinton did (Hillary's devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practice law for 'lying under oath' to a grand jury, followed by his subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.), but others I can agree show a definite flare for corruption.

Still, you have to admit that is a much smaller and pitiful list compared to:

http://quantum-displacement.tumblr.com/post/146015554444/anti-trump-masterpost

Like, really small and pitiful.

And I argue that it'd not be difficult to find a equal or larger list on most notable politicians in Washington of this day and age. Corruption is wide spread. That's the sad state we live in.

True they are both bad. But you cant really control who endurses you am i right?. So imo most of clintons actions have effected much more people.

Keep scrolling down.  There is a LOT more to the list than well-deserved endorsements fom the KKK and America's adversaries. 



VAMatt said:
Mr Puggsly said:

As I've said before, if you're poor or in some other situation that allows you to get it free. That's going to account for a high percentage of people that love it.

If you're a normal working person that doesn't exactly make a lot of money, you very likely hate it. Before ACA a lot of us were paying significantly less for coverage, which is ironic given the name. What I'm essentially saying its been a burden on the average working person.

The ACA had caused my premium to increase 430% for coverage that is still slightly worse than the mediocre stuff I had before.  Nowadays, because of my high deductible, I see the doctor far less often than I used to.  So, the ACA has had a direct negative impact on the quality of my Healthcare and the money in my walllet.

Just wondering, if the ACA caused your premium to increase that much are you buying it yourself or do you get it from your company you work for.  Only asking because that seems really high compared to my experience which did not increase at all.



"People really need to actually start doing their own research. Instead of being brainwashed by alex jones and parroting things over and over trying to sound deep.

1) Hilary did not laugh.  http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/  Seriously go read it both of you.

She didnt free him, she didnt laugh. Those are just des perate talking points."

Hmmm... your link seems to be pointing to 'nowhere'

I am sorry dear but Hillary did laugh and she was very, very proud of what she did: plea-bargain a monstrous child rapist into 'time served'. How do I know it? I actually listened to the tape so cut the spin. Here's the recording:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7ti7cnEIAo 

She's sounds so proud of what she did. Did that child rapist who raped a 12 yr old girl so hard, he put her into a coma, was he respectful of women? I am asking because Hillary defended him very vigurously. In fact, as the tape show, she even took a trip to Brooklyn, NY to meet with the world's foremost expert in rape forensics so that she could free her darling. Of course, I admit, whatever that animal did was not half as bad as Trump's words.

And she staying married with an alleged rapist and an admitted women abuser - he did pay almost a million dollars to settle with Paula Jones - is in no way inconsistent with her so courageously and uncomprimisingly fighting for woemn rights and equalities.



WagnerPaiva said:
Because the SJWs think the world is gonna end if they can´t have a liberal freak in the Whitehouse. They will calm down when they see Trump is doing a good job.

What exactly in Trump background make you believe he will do a good job.  I keep looking through Trump background as a businessman and I do not see someone who shows me that he will do a good job.  I look at Trump character and I just see a very greedy rich guy looking to make his lot in life better.  Nothing during Trump 70 years shows he ever cared about anything or anyone outside of himself.  From Trump body of work can anyone really show where he has shown he will do a good job as president.



Bandorr said:
Norris2k said:

You missed my point (perhaps the way I wrote it). My point is in bold, but I had to explain the background, and that is about defending a guy you say you know is guilty.

I know she was assigned, I have no problem with her being assigned to this case, and no problem with someone guilty having defense, first because that guilt has to be decided fairly, and even if proven guilty there are circumstances that need to be cleary explained by a lawyer to give a fair result. At the end of the day, the attorneys, included defense, are here to serve Justice. When I hear the record, justice was not served, and she just says it herself (and laugh...).

 

People really need to actually start doing their own research. Instead of being brainwashed by alex jones and parroting things over and over trying to sound deep.

1) Hilary did not laugh.  http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/  Seriously go read it both of you.

She didnt free him, she didnt laugh. Those are just desperate talking points.

2) The woman BILL (not hilarly who is running for president) supposely raped - signed an affidavit saying it didn't happen. Combined with the FBI finding no evience. OH and let's add that little part where breitbart payed for her to go to the debate.

2b) Yet we JUST heard a tape about how trump just walks up to women and grabs them. Certaintly puts a new light on HIS rape case. One that hasn't been dismissed, investigated, or have the person sign an affidavit saying it didn't happen. LIttle alone when you read the testament of his first way claiming he raped her.

Seriouisly go read up on things and be less of a sock puppet with a hand up your backside.

About 1, you quote me on that, and you say that Hillary did not laugh. But I heard the record myself, and it seems all the way the same conversation about this case, and I heard her laughing twice at the end of sentences I could not laugh about. It was also shown this way on Fox News, and if I agree there are biased in favor of republicans and Trump, I would disagree if you think O'Reilly is just a lunatic, conspiracist, crazy guy.

On the other hand, you provide a link that explains it all, I clicked on it and I got a 404 not found page.