The creator and developer studio...

 There are some differences, for instance gamefreak owns, iirc  50%  of the pokemon company , where as Polophony is fully owned by Sony, but for reasons I'm not to sure of it was a long time ago, they decided to create Polophony as a subsidury rather than a studio, most likely to help insure Kaz's continued involvement since GT was his baby , and you have to remember it was the PS1 era, so Sony's need to build up successful Ist party IP's to augment it's 3rd party efforts on a new console meant they had a premium  and when you have one with sales right up there with the biggest names in gaming, why it became a subsidury becomes clearer.     

sorry about that must have clicked multi quote . do you know how i stop it.              

Pokemon was created by a lonely man that loved collecting bugs at his youth and had a game magazine called Gamefreak, later to become a videogame development studio.

Story is that he (Satoshi, the guy talked above) saw the gameboy cable link capabilities of exchanging data, and had the perfect idea to finally make a game about his young days hobby of collecting and exchanging creatures, so he went for Nintendo with his idea, and we all know how well it went.
GameFreak and also The Pokemon Company still hold rights over the brand.

GameFreak is not a first part studio, as they already developed games for the Mega Drive back in the day, and more recently a PC game, but Nintendo also owns a share of Pokemon rights. Nintendo didn't create Pokemon, but they took part on shaping it.

Dunno, someone asked questions, I'm answering them.

Pokemon was created by a lonely man that loved collecting bugs at his youth and had a game magazine called Gamefreak, later to become a videogame development studio.

Story is that he (Satoshi, the guy talked above) saw the gameboy cable link capabilities of exchanging data, and had the perfect idea to finally make a game about his young days hobby of collecting and exchanging creatures, so he went for Nintendo with his idea, and we all know how well it went.
GameFreak and also The Pokemon Company still hold rights over the brand.

GameFreak is not a first part studio, as they already developed games for the Mega Drive back in the day, and more recently a PC game, but Nintendo also owns a share of Pokemon rights. Nintendo didn't create Pokemon, but they took part on shaping it.

Really?  What an odd conclusion.  I could easily fault all of them, common sense was severley lacking.

The Last of Us and God of War 3 do have very impressive detail for PS3 games. Characters in Uncharted 2 have 80k polygons and The Last of Us probably has more. The environments are also very detailed. God of War 3 has an incredible scale especially the titans. It also has dynamic lighting when using the head of helios. Forza 5 has very detailed cars and roads but the environments aren't very detailed with crowds being sprites and the game only has one weather condition and very less use of particle effects.

We were talking about Forza 5 here not what the XB1 and Turn 10 are capable of doing. Forza 6 doesn't have the same problems and looks amazing even on XB1. The best comparison can be made between Forza 6 and GT Sport in terms of graphics when that releases.