Set the system down on a table. Detach the controller sides. Play the game. 

If it's near a TV, my guess is you can stream the video signal to the TV instead. 

"Playing smash is going to be awesome on this thing.

Said the villain.

"Also, I look forward to going back to single screen Pokemon battles."

Also said the villain, once more.

Actually out of the big three.. Sony is actually moving ahead by making PlayStation itself a platform, not  console.... PlayStation is soon going to be offered on various smart boxes and smart TVs..... Ps Vue is somewhat taking off on ps4, and ps now is probably going to bring HD console gaming to mobile and tablet space shortly.... As ps now is a Netflix for games service with super high quality streaming..... They have all the tools and have been gradually expanding their brand outside of the console space

No. Flops is simply silly in your comparison.

Tegra K1/X1 and it's derivatives could have 10 Teraflops of theoretical performance, it still will not beat a PS4.

Going by Tegra's specs, 720P and lower will be the norm... Tegra doesn't have the fillrate or the bandwidth to drive higher resolutions.

Mechanical Hard Drive's won't happen. They consume far to much energy, nsoisy and prone to failure in portable devices.

Nintendo will likely have MicroSD card support to expand internal storage, augmented by cartridge games.

That's a Wii U. If you haven't been paying attention... Games have started to balloon in size on almost every other platform. :P

Based on what? Teraflops? No.

nVidia stated the Tegra K1 was roughly 50% faster than the Xbox 360/Playstation 3.
But it had inferior fill rate and memory bandwidth amongst other things.

The Tegra X1 was 50% faster to double the performance of the K1 depending on situation... And unlike the K1 it had superior fillrate, geometry, bandwidth etc'.

That's what we can expect relative to last generation consoles.

Nintendo does better when seeking an audience Sony and MS doesent have.

Wii U was a failed attempt to appeal to a more core audience. Hence the more traditional gamepad and push for core games at launch

Obviously if the NX is going to be as powerful as a Wii U, then it's games will also be similar in size, i.e. Zelda BotW. Other platforms are irrelevant.

Not exactly.
More space is always welcomed... And can be eaten up by things like video and higher quality audio regardless of the systems base hardware. It's not all used just for pretty graphics.

No way I as reading that article, but but going of what people said, it dosent mentioned that this is the only device. This soounds only like a handheld with an hdmi, maybe by next holliday the big brother comes out that could have neo parity. The hybryd statment could just be that they use the same cartridges, so one game purchase would let you play it on both.

Wich is why they are pushing for something as strong as an x1 for a hand held, just strong enoufgh for it to handle water down console games.

This could work for third partys, I mean, there is no reason third partys would have to suport a game being playeable on both the weak hh and the strong console, they culd just make it playeable on the console, then nintendo games or whoever really wants to can push the game to be playeable on both. Cuz I think this was an issue with the wii u, they where ppusshing devs to use the tablet when there was no need. I mean they could even release a biger capacity cartridge for console only games that would take massive amounts of storage. witcher 3 is like 70gb on my hardrive.

But I hope its the powerfull docking station that ends up hapening. It could save money for thouse that want both. I mean a $250 HH, then to have console quality, the docking station can have something like a rx 470 or 480 for $150 or $200 more. Thats having both cnsoles for $450 and that sounds good to me.

But if this is the only thing coming out, this hybreed, then its a big disapointment. Please nintendo, if this rumor is true, at least release a full console as well.

Makes me think about the chip design. If it were for Nintendo alone they would just take a 20nm X1 design and be done with it. But invidia is tech-oriented and wants its brand associated with high performance so maybe they push for 16nm X2 design.

Current management of Nintendo needs to evaluate all plans made in Iwata era. Because current management is the only one capable for identifying a flop and hit. I was expecting a powerful console with normal controllers.