Quantcast
Black Tusk renamed to The Coalition. will show more at E3. becoming a "gears machine"

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Black Tusk renamed to The Coalition. will show more at E3. becoming a "gears machine"

LudicrousSpeed said:
You mean a company who makes software wants a studio to focus on one of their all time biggest selling and best received franchises ever? No way. Next you'll tell me the Green Bay Packers are going to keep Aaron Rodgers at QB instead of letting him branch out to tight end or free safety.

I don't care about the name change portion, just deliver quality Gears games please. lol @ all the sudden concern in this thread.

Have you seen the gameplay, i think nobody has yet except the name, so i gues it's normal when people talking only for the name.



Around the Network
LudicrousSpeed said:
You mean a company who makes software wants a studio to focus on one of their all time biggest selling and best received franchises ever? No way. Next you'll tell me the Green Bay Packers are going to keep Aaron Rodgers at QB instead of letting him branch out to tight end or free safety.

I don't care about the name change portion, just deliver quality Gears games please. lol @ all the sudden concern in this thread.

Translation: Why should they let a studio of their own try and make something new and big when that's so risky and they can instead just continue a series that's already popular on its own, that's so much easier.



DerNebel said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
You mean a company who makes software wants a studio to focus on one of their all time biggest selling and best received franchises ever? No way. Next you'll tell me the Green Bay Packers are going to keep Aaron Rodgers at QB instead of letting him branch out to tight end or free safety.

I don't care about the name change portion, just deliver quality Gears games please. lol @ all the sudden concern in this thread.

Translation: Why should they let a studio of their own try and make something new and big when that's so risky and they can instead just continue a series that's already popular on its own, that's so much easier.

Translating the translation: Video Game Publishing 101



One other thing of note. MS does have a pretty liberal policy of allowing people to move around from one group to another. Can anyone say that isnt the case with the different game studios? Maybe a dev or artist from 343 moves to Coalition after current project is complete and vice versa.



Its libraries that sell systems not a single game.

LudicrousSpeed said:
DerNebel said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
You mean a company who makes software wants a studio to focus on one of their all time biggest selling and best received franchises ever? No way. Next you'll tell me the Green Bay Packers are going to keep Aaron Rodgers at QB instead of letting him branch out to tight end or free safety.

I don't care about the name change portion, just deliver quality Gears games please. lol @ all the sudden concern in this thread.

Translation: Why should they let a studio of their own try and make something new and big when that's so risky and they can instead just continue a series that's already popular on its own, that's so much easier.

Translating the translation: Video Game Publishing 101

As if that's commendable or necessary, Sony for example is regularly letting their studios make new IPs.



Around the Network
DerNebel said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
DerNebel said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
You mean a company who makes software wants a studio to focus on one of their all time biggest selling and best received franchises ever? No way. Next you'll tell me the Green Bay Packers are going to keep Aaron Rodgers at QB instead of letting him branch out to tight end or free safety.

I don't care about the name change portion, just deliver quality Gears games please. lol @ all the sudden concern in this thread.

Translation: Why should they let a studio of their own try and make something new and big when that's so risky and they can instead just continue a series that's already popular on its own, that's so much easier.

Translating the translation: Video Game Publishing 101

As if that's commendable or necessary, Sony for example is regularly letting their studios make new IPs.

@ LudicrousSpeed: Hideo Kojima at Konami. 'nuff said.



true_fan said:
Happy gaming to all though, let's hope they nail Gears of War and go on to make Shangheist, so that Banaking, DerNobel, Archangel.... can purchase an XB1.


if you have a personal problem with me report it and move on. but stop derailing my thread with your blind allegiance and nonesense. thank you. 

User moderated for this post -RavenXtra



MoHasanie said:
The name sounds bad. Black Tusk was better but Microsoft Vancouver was the best one.


nuu uhh.  black tusk was a cool name. it was a tusk.. and it was black... the color black is cool, tusks are like cool pointy swords coming out of cool animals. so black tusk was cool. MS Vancouver was lame... this new one is also lame... 



Not liking that name at all really. Also, it's a shame that we won't get any new IP's from them now. Just Gears after Gears....



bananaking21 said:
true_fan said:
Happy gaming to all though, let's hope they nail Gears of War and go on to make Shangheist, so that Banaking, DerNobel, Archangel.... can purchase an XB1.


if you have a personal problem with me report it and move on. but stop derailing my thread with your blind allegiance and nonesense. thank you. 

Blind allegiance coming from you. WOW! 

How is my comment derailing? You said you were concerned Shanheist was completely cancelled, so I hope that eventually it releases so you can buy an XB1. Or are you fake concerned about Shangheist, agenda perhaps?