By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - The Order 1886 Review Thread - Meta: 66

Johnw1104 on 19 February 2015

I read gamespot's Kirby review first today (5/10), was terribly disappointed, and then was quite relieved to find that nearly everyone else was giving it a 100%-80%.

I then read gamespot's Order review (also 5/10), expected to find the same improvement elsewhere... And was sorely disappointed lol

This looks like one I'll pick up used for $15 in a couple years.



Around the Network
0815user on 19 February 2015
reggin_bolas said:
Guys, the game is bad. Let's just move on. And yes we don't have to play a game to "know" it's bad. There is knowledge a priori

It's just dumb to tell people to fork up 60 just so they can validate their opinion when we all know the game isn't going to be worth it.

and that "knowlegde" is based on which factors?



Jimbo1337 on 19 February 2015
walsufnir said:
Jimbo1337 said:

Huh?  How can a broken game be fun and have replay value when it is...idk...broken?


Huh? Not completely meaning only certain parts of a game like online gaming.

So explain the logic behind reviewers giving high remarks for a portion of the game that is unplayable.  How can you review and score something so highly when you dont have the ability to review it in the first place?




reggin_bolas on 19 February 2015
0815user said:
reggin_bolas said:
Guys, the game is bad. Let's just move on. And yes we don't have to play a game to "know" it's bad. There is knowledge a priori

It's just dumb to tell people to fork up 60 just so they can validate their opinion when we all know the game isn't going to be worth it.

and that "knowlegde" is based on which factors?

Based on the meta review of the game? 



Game_God on 19 February 2015
HintHRO said:
Exactly what real gamers were expecting. You could see from the very start this would be another boring TPS with a QTE fetish. But most gamers somehow automatically correlate beautiful graphics to a great experience: it does not.


That is why so many defended it & still do!

This game shows exactly the pit the gaming industry is falling in: Shiny-shiny but crappy-crappy.

It's been a while that eyecandy has been the main break or make factor for videogames.

Gamers jump in mass into the hype pool, blinded by the visual eyecandy so devs abuse & cultivate this easy way of marketing/hyping games that rely heavily on graphic technical aspects (good technicians) rather than creative gameplay mechanics (good game designers), with propaganda focusing on the wrapping hiding the substance under the rug.

How gamers conditioned to react to eyecandy will now hype themselves if they can't rely on the graphic factor? That's why so many are defending it despite the evidence. The consensual metric is being proved flawed!

This time it seems the wine despite a good looking bottle, was more vinegar than a good vintage!

Will lessons be learned?

Gameplay > graphics! Always!!!



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n29CicBxZuw

01001011 01101001 01110011 01110011 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01111001 00100000 01101101 01100101 01110100 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100001 01110011 01110011 00100001

Around the Network
Game_God on 19 February 2015
tilkoboy said:


You gotta respect the man, he takes action!!!



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n29CicBxZuw

01001011 01101001 01110011 01110011 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01111001 00100000 01101101 01100101 01110100 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100001 01110011 01110011 00100001

Game_God on 19 February 2015
zippy said:
Check out this RAD dev interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FV-u5tvQC34


That's the funniest thing I've seen in a while, yet so true!!!

+100 to you sir :D



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n29CicBxZuw

01001011 01101001 01110011 01110011 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01111001 00100000 01101101 01100101 01110100 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100001 01110011 01110011 00100001

DonFerrari on 19 February 2015
kowenicki said:
deskpro2k3 said:


Can say the same with MS with Ryse.


well its 3rd party and MS havent been banging on about 1080p 60fps at exec level on a regualr basis (for obvious reasons)


Nope, they are more on the 720p=1080p Train.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Uabit on 19 February 2015

Most likely renting this game. Not worth buying a game with such a poor gameplay, story and stupid AI.

The only good thing about the game like digital foundry said is that it actually looks as good as some pre-rendered movies and in real time, so graphics are 11/10



reggin_bolas on 19 February 2015
Game_God said:
zippy said:
Check out this RAD dev interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FV-u5tvQC34


That's the funniest thing I've seen in a while, yet so true!!!

+100 to you sir :D

Yeah I just saw it. Some funny shit. Go watch this people.