By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Judge allows lawsuit over Killzone Shadow Fall's 1080p graphics to proceed

Source: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-12-18-judge-allows-lawsuit-over-killzone-shadow-falls-1080p-graphics-to-proceed

 

The lawsuit over Killzone Shadow Fall's graphics may yet go to court.

In August we reported on a class action lawsuit that accused Sony of misleading gamers when it said Guerrilla Games' PlayStation 4-exclusive first-person shooter would run at a native 1080p resolution.

After the game's release alongside the PS4 last year, Eurogamer's Digital Foundry found Shadow Fall's multiplayer runs at 960x1080 with a "high quality temporal upscale". Essentially, the game was using information from previously rendered frames to plug the gaps.

Killzone developer Guerrilla Games addressed this matter (...)

The plaintiff, Douglas Ladore, accused Sony of "deceptive marketing". Sony had sought to have the lawsuit thrown out in a motion filed in October, arguing its representations about the graphics weren't false, that Ladore didn't adequately plead reliance on any alleged misrepresentation, that the game doesn't fall under the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act and that the "economic loss rule" bars Ladore's tort claim for negligent misrepresentation.

But on Tuesday this week a judge in the US ruled the lawsuit could proceed. US District Judge Edward Chen denied all but one of Sony's arguments, saying its motion to dismiss was "premised on an unduly narrow reading of plaintiff's complaint".

"The substantial majority of the arguments Sony raises in its motion to dismiss can be rejected for two simple reasons," the Judge said.

"Either Sony's arguments ignore important factual allegations that are well pleaded in Ladore's complaint, or Sony's arguments require this court to construe the complaint in the light most favourable to Sony, rather than Ladore, who is entitled to the benefit of all reasonable inferences at this stage of the proceedings," Chen wrote (via Courthouse News- you can check out the ruling here).

The one successful argument on Sony's part revolved around the economic loss rule, since Ladore hadn't asserted any noneconomic losses stemming from buying the game.

The crux of the matter appears to revolve around the word "native". In his order, Judge Chen admitted Sony "may ultimately" be correct that Killzone outputs video in 1080p in multiplayer mode, but stressed that Ladore does not allege Sony misrepresented the final output resolution of the game. The allegation is that Killzone's multiplayer graphics are not originally created or rendered in 1080p, so the output cannot be considered native 1080p.

"Instead, Ladore alleges that Sony relied on a technological trick to turn lower resolution graphics into graphics that, in Sony's own words, appear 'subjectively similar' to native 1080p," Judge Chen continued, "but which by Ladore's account were 'blurry' and subpar."

The suit is being handed by law firm Edelson, who previously took action against EA for failing to provide free digital copies of Battlefield 1943 with every purchase of Battlefield 3, as it was advertised, and it handled the class-action lawsuit against Sega and Gearbox for Aliens: Colonial Marines' less than stellar quality.

Ladore has 30 days to file an amended complaint.



Around the Network

Kinda feel like a lawsuit is frivolous, it's not like the visual quality was compromised (and parts of the game did run in 1080p)



                                                                                                               You're Gonna Carry That Weight.

Xbox One - PS4 - Wii U - PC

Who's paying for this?

Was it by any chance filed in Texas?



Hmm, pie.

1080P means a vertical resolution of 1080 pixels. 960x1080 is 1080P, case closed.



Talk about first world problems.



Around the Network

You can seriously sue for anything these days...



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

AnthonyW86 said:
1080P means a vertical resolution of 1080 pixels. 960x1080 is 1080P, case closed.

This. Sony didn't say 2.1 megapixels, they said 1080p, which can include a variety of horizontal pixel counts. 



The case should be dismissed for being utterly frivolous, of no consequence and a waste of the court's time. Having said that Sony should be criticised for playing fast and loose with claims of native 1080p if that's not actually the case.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

Euphoria14 said:
You can seriously sue for anything these days...

No, you can't sue the right of Americans to own weapons.

Because it's in the Bill of Rights! 

Let's totally forget that the Bill of Rights was written during a civil war. 

This is why more people should study history. But I guess people rather mock the study and "claim" it's useless. Meanwhile religious nutjobs abuse holy books like the Bible and the Koran because they have no knowledge of the historical context those books were written in. And even worse: their audience. 

Yeah, this is an off-topic rant. My apologies. 



If you deceive in marketing, whether it is a small exaggeration or large one, you may end up paying the price.

In this case, there isn't much to argue about, but I hope that if they are going to waste the time to try it that they go all the way and make Sony pay.

Making Sony pay will lead to a more honest approach in the industry in general.



It is near the end of the end....