By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - Is the Wii U Really Doing Bad? My Viewpoint

oniyide said:
CosmicSex said:
SJReiter said:
oniyide said:
SJReiter said:
I may be mistaken, but is it really fair to compare sales of the N64, GC, Wii, and Wii U? I just feel like it's unfair to compare sales from the mid to late 1990s to the early to mid 2010s. I believe console sales should be compared to their immediate competition, and not past generations.


Even if we were to do that. It doesnt make Wii U look better. It looks just as bad if not worse


You're totally right, but I think that is a more interesting discussion worth having. I may be missing something here but I just don't see the point in comparing Wii U sales to N64 sales. I just feel like the two are completely unrelated.


You bring up an interesting point... I mean after all, no console can be doing well if we compare it to the PS2.  The point I was trying to make is that the Wii should not be directly compared to the Wii U, because its performance was unusual and unlikely to be repeated.  Comparing the Wii U to the Xbox One and PS4 is more appropiate yes.  However, when determining if the Wii U is doing good or not, its performance should be compared to Nintendo's average performance. 


I see what you are trying to say, but Im still a little confused. People are naturally going to compare it to WIi because that was its predessecor, lets get real. There isnt anything wrong with that. People dont want to compare it now, because Wii U is doing so bad it would make it look worse and be honest did you really think Wii U would flop like this? coming off of the Wii? So yes lets say now in hindsight we shouldnt compare. 

But thats the whole thing of it is. Ninty consoles have been on the decline SINCE the NES. every system after that has fallen sans Wii. So if you dont compare Wii then it still dont look good. Determing whether its good or bad depending on what Ninty's average is is not accurate cause one could make the argument that there consoles DONT sell good anyway. I would compare it to industry sales and standards versus what is being bought at the time. You cant act like Ninty exist in a bubble.

You do have a point about how we can't act like Nintendo exists in a bubble. The fact is that, excluding the Wii, each Nintendo console has sold worse than it's predecessor, while the video game industry as a whole has grown in terms of sales with each new generation. Having said that, it's not really fair to Nintendo to exclude the Wii since it was an incredible success.



Around the Network
SJReiter said:
oniyide said:
CosmicSex said:
SJReiter said:
oniyide said:
SJReiter said:
I may be mistaken, but is it really fair to compare sales of the N64, GC, Wii, and Wii U? I just feel like it's unfair to compare sales from the mid to late 1990s to the early to mid 2010s. I believe console sales should be compared to their immediate competition, and not past generations.


Even if we were to do that. It doesnt make Wii U look better. It looks just as bad if not worse


You're totally right, but I think that is a more interesting discussion worth having. I may be missing something here but I just don't see the point in comparing Wii U sales to N64 sales. I just feel like the two are completely unrelated.


You bring up an interesting point... I mean after all, no console can be doing well if we compare it to the PS2.  The point I was trying to make is that the Wii should not be directly compared to the Wii U, because its performance was unusual and unlikely to be repeated.  Comparing the Wii U to the Xbox One and PS4 is more appropiate yes.  However, when determining if the Wii U is doing good or not, its performance should be compared to Nintendo's average performance. 


I see what you are trying to say, but Im still a little confused. People are naturally going to compare it to WIi because that was its predessecor, lets get real. There isnt anything wrong with that. People dont want to compare it now, because Wii U is doing so bad it would make it look worse and be honest did you really think Wii U would flop like this? coming off of the Wii? So yes lets say now in hindsight we shouldnt compare. 

But thats the whole thing of it is. Ninty consoles have been on the decline SINCE the NES. every system after that has fallen sans Wii. So if you dont compare Wii then it still dont look good. Determing whether its good or bad depending on what Ninty's average is is not accurate cause one could make the argument that there consoles DONT sell good anyway. I would compare it to industry sales and standards versus what is being bought at the time. You cant act like Ninty exist in a bubble.

You do have a point about how we can't act like Nintendo exists in a bubble. The fact is that, excluding the Wii, each Nintendo console has sold worse than it's predecessor, while the video game industry as a whole has grown in terms of sales with each new generation. Having said that, it's not really fair to Nintendo to exclude the Wii since it was an incredible success.

if we exclude Wii. Wii u looks bad. If we include it. It looks eve worse. I say pick your poison.



OP it is you who doesn't have a clear grasp on what made the Wii "unusual"

the Wii is a continuation of the Pong/Atari 2600/NES phenomenon. It is far from a "freak of nature". It's the entire direction that gaming took after the fourth gen that is the real "freak"



I LOVE ICELAND!

DélioPT said:


Their home console business is in more peril than the handheld business. Which is weird when all you hear is how handhelds are dead!

And that's saying something since the 3DS isn't doing all that great either! It's not doing bad, but it would appear is though the portable market has shrinked somewhat.

The only to actually lure MS and Sony fans is by giving them games that they like exclusively on the home console. That's the only way to do it. If not, we will see some 3rd parties bringing their games at launch and afterwards just to see people buying them on PS4 or XB1.
Gamers can move from one console to another, but you need to give them a really good reason to do it.

I whole heartedly agree; with the right kind of SW gamers of all kinds will come.

Sometimes i think Nintendo knows very well that their strategy of dumping their best games in the first 2 years on the market is not enough. It didn't work for GC and it didn't even work for Wii. The big exclusives always went to PS2/Xbox and PS3/Xbox 360, because Sony and MS created a business for them!

Have they really though? Couldn't they just as well blame the Wii U's failure on the controller? It seems as if Nintendo is very reluctant to learn any kind of lessons...

We are still a couple years, at least, from a new console by Nintendo.
Ideally, now, would be the best way to start building studios and new franchises. But there's still time.

I say they have 3 years until the Fusion has to launch; the 3DS is half way through it's life circle, and Wii U is fast approaching that mark as well. The problem is that it might be another 2 years until PS5 releases, and thus yet again leaving Nintendo in the dust powerwise. So, either make Fusion (prefertly with NEW Western Studios making games) or make a god damn powerhouse of a home console!

If Splatoon actually does well in the US and Europe we might see Nintendo greenlighting more of those projects instead of making them in western studios.
Personally, i'm hopeful that Nintendo's next financial briefing, which is in a couple of weeks, will reveal even more of their plans for the next generation. We might even be happy about some things.

I hope Splatoon takes of and that that initiates a time of new IP's for Nintendo; and hopefully not only Japanese ones bur Western as well.

When is their next briefing?





I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

Tachikoma said:
DanneSandin said:
Yes, Wii U is doing poorly - even compared with GC! And that's not good at all. With the success of the Wii I think it's quite fair to say that Nintendo should have gotten more fans than they had in the GC days, but that doesn't seem to be the case.

They netted a lot of casuals, and a generation of kids.

Issue is the casuals moved on, the generation got older and wanted other things, and the new generation of kids don't really seem interested in what Nintendo has to offer, leaving only the hardcore fans and the stragglers from previous generations that felt an attachment enough to keep buying.

The numbers speak for themselves, The WiiU is doing poorly.

Yeah kids ain't as loyal as they used to be! This damn mobile playing generation is gon' be the end of the industry! ;)

The industry has changed, and Nintendo has choosen to stay way behind - and it's showing with the Wii U



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

Around the Network
DanneSandin said:
Tachikoma said:
DanneSandin said:
Yes, Wii U is doing poorly - even compared with GC! And that's not good at all. With the success of the Wii I think it's quite fair to say that Nintendo should have gotten more fans than they had in the GC days, but that doesn't seem to be the case.

They netted a lot of casuals, and a generation of kids.

Issue is the casuals moved on, the generation got older and wanted other things, and the new generation of kids don't really seem interested in what Nintendo has to offer, leaving only the hardcore fans and the stragglers from previous generations that felt an attachment enough to keep buying.

The numbers speak for themselves, The WiiU is doing poorly.

Yeah kids ain't as loyal as they used to be! This damn mobile playing generation is gon' be the end of the industry! ;)

The industry has changed, and Nintendo has choosen to stay way behind - and it's showing with the Wii U

I wouldn't even say it's a loyalty problem. Young kids of now have the choice of not even paying attention to the 3 gaming systems. If they play a game on a phone. Because it's ultimatly cheaper for the adult to buy them. Than they won't care/know about The other options. So that loyalty hasn't even started.



archer9234 said:
DanneSandin said:

Yeah kids ain't as loyal as they used to be! This damn mobile playing generation is gon' be the end of the industry! ;)

The industry has changed, and Nintendo has choosen to stay way behind - and it's showing with the Wii U

I wouldn't even say it's a loyalty problem. Young kids of now have the choice of not even paying attention to the 3 gaming systems. If they play a game on a phone. Because it's ultimatly cheaper for the adult to buy them. Than they won't care/know about The other options. So that loyalty hasn't even started.

Damn straight! I wonder how that'll effect the whole industry in a few years when its not getting any fresh meat so to speak ;)



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

it's not selling very well, but Nintendo confirmed a few months back it has started to become a profit. and with smash and many other games on the way, I think it will rise.



DanneSandin said:
DélioPT said:


Their home console business is in more peril than the handheld business. Which is weird when all you hear is how handhelds are dead!

And that's saying something since the 3DS isn't doing all that great either! It's not doing bad, but it would appear is though the portable market has shrinked somewhat.

The only to actually lure MS and Sony fans is by giving them games that they like exclusively on the home console. That's the only way to do it. If not, we will see some 3rd parties bringing their games at launch and afterwards just to see people buying them on PS4 or XB1.
Gamers can move from one console to another, but you need to give them a really good reason to do it.

I whole heartedly agree; with the right kind of SW gamers of all kinds will come.

Sometimes i think Nintendo knows very well that their strategy of dumping their best games in the first 2 years on the market is not enough. It didn't work for GC and it didn't even work for Wii. The big exclusives always went to PS2/Xbox and PS3/Xbox 360, because Sony and MS created a business for them!

Have they really though? Couldn't they just as well blame the Wii U's failure on the controller? It seems as if Nintendo is very reluctant to learn any kind of lessons...

We are still a couple years, at least, from a new console by Nintendo.
Ideally, now, would be the best way to start building studios and new franchises. But there's still time.

I say they have 3 years until the Fusion has to launch; the 3DS is half way through it's life circle, and Wii U is fast approaching that mark as well. The problem is that it might be another 2 years until PS5 releases, and thus yet again leaving Nintendo in the dust powerwise. So, either make Fusion (prefertly with NEW Western Studios making games) or make a god damn powerhouse of a home console!

If Splatoon actually does well in the US and Europe we might see Nintendo greenlighting more of those projects instead of making them in western studios.
Personally, i'm hopeful that Nintendo's next financial briefing, which is in a couple of weeks, will reveal even more of their plans for the next generation. We might even be happy about some things.

I hope Splatoon takes of and that that initiates a time of new IP's for Nintendo; and hopefully not only Japanese ones bur Western as well.

When is their next briefing?



Without a doubt the handheld market has shrunk.
Before, parents could only contemplate a Nintendo portable for their kids, now they just lend their tablets or smartphones to play whatever game they have there and that's it.
That's why the Fusion strategy is vital to Nintendo: less spending on games and more revenue/profit with each game they release. So, even if they can't go back to GBA levels of HW sales, they can at least hope for a better financial state.

Wii U's tablet wasn't the reason for Wii U's situation. If anything, Nintendo tried to introduce a tablet with buttons and joyticks to an audience that was used to tablets and wasn't afraid anymore of those buttons, as a result of their experiment with the Wii remote and nunchuk.
It's just that everything else around it, failed.

I can't see 3DS lasting another 3/4 years.
3DS has, by year's end, been in the market for almost 4 years.
We already saw sales being flat last year despite a huge line-up. This year sales are going to fall a lot. And next year, if NEW 3DS hasn't another great line-up, it will fall even more.
Wii U won't last because it's sales are so low that when they start to go down (normal lifecycle) it won't be able to keep on sustaining the SW sales Nintendo needs.
Even if at GC levels in HW, Nintendo gets less profits for the same amount of games sold during GC's life. How do you justify big investments?
I wouldn't be surprised if Nintendo announces the fusion strategy in 2016 to be released in the same year. By then, almost 6 years for 3DS and 4 for Wii U. And whatever titles they have for the Fusion consoles, they will release it on Wii U to keep fans happy.

I'm really curious about Splatoon.
It's SP mode might be the TPS Wii U also needs. And with a frantic MP mode it could really do wonders for Wii U and Nintendo's image in general.
NIntendo also has high hopes for the game. They said they want it to be another MK or Smash, i can't remember.

The next briefing is on 29th October.



I think it's selling okay.



Consoles owned: Wii U wii gamecube DS DS lite DSi 3DS Xbox 360 Gameboy Gameboy color Gameboy advance Gameboy Advance sp Gameboy micro and PC.