Why isn't Rayman Raving Rabids part of the Rayman series?

Well, one of the biggest reasons for the success of AC is the yearly releases, even if they get a little stale after a while. If they did the same with a rebooted Prince of Persia, I'm sure they could see success with that franchise as well.

Wow, Petz is killing it!

Those Rayman numbers are too low for my liking! T_T

always knew that prince of persia's downfall was because of the shifted focus to AC. I like both franchises, but Ubi began treating POP like some cheap whore lol.

Great, now give me more Rayman, Driver, and Prince of Persia. Getting really tired of Assassins Creed.

I anticipate that Far Cry will climb those ranks a little, and then if Watch_Dogs takes off and becomes annual than that can enter also.

After two 2D Rayman games, I wonder if Ubisoft will think about making a 3D Rayman game!

They're smaller than I thought they'd be.

Anno at just 5m? It has had five games, so guess the first two didn't sell a lot. Although maybe those aren't counted because the franchise wasn't Ubisoft's back then. Anyway, I played countless hours of Anno 1602, it's genius. The second and third were a little mediocre, but the fourth is awesome again. Anno 1404 was a return to form. Haven't played Anno 2070 because the futuristic setting didn't appeal to me, but I hope they'll make a good successor sooner rather than later.

Assassin's Creed @ 73m, doesn't that make it like top 15 franchise of all time? hot damn.