Ponyless said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Ponyless said:
Mystro-Sama said:
Its the in the post you just quoted, Dude. -.- |
And i asked you if those things are important to the game? Would you enjoy resogun a lot less if it didn't have all the particle effects? Would you call people delusional if they enjoyed a resogun that didn't have those particle effects because they ported it to PS3/PSV for some reason.
Read my post please.
|
Would wii have been a success if the hardware that allowed motion not been implemented? It matters..a lot.
|
Why are you using the wii as an example lol, read the first post:
I often hear arguements like "it's not the hardware it's what you do with it" which is so fucking stupid and backwards and only said to damage control for Nintendo when the only reason Nintendo makes underpowered systems is to generate more profit (which they don't even need) at the cost of limiting the creativity of their devs. There is no one way gamers benefit from this shit.
He's not talking about different hardware that allowed motion control, he's very strictly talking about graphical power only, and other things that come with a stronger gpu/cpu.
|
So the wii doesn't fit your argument, so you downplay it.... Sorry hardware matters a lot, saying otherwise is foolish.
Its not just motion you ignored the rest of my post. Without hardware advances, handhleds dont ecxist, motion doesn't. Bigger worlds, better games, ai, effects, online connectivity, more immersion.
OPne cannot exist without the other, saying one is not important is piure fantasy.