By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Hardware does matter! (hear me out)

160rmf said:
FlamingWeazel said:
160rmf said:
Uabit said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Uabit said:

Then fuck consoles and everyone to the PC to play Full HD or even 4k and buy cheaper games in Steam Offers. Hardware doesn't matter, if not consoles would be dead long time ago


Whya re peopel buying ps4's then? Why not just play games on PS3?? The entire industry is driven by hardware saying it doesn;t matter is simply fantasy. Most of software sales were games that are on last gen...............


Why did PS2 being a lot less powerful than Gamecube/Xbox sell a lot more consoles? Or Wii being a lot less powerful than X360 and PS3? Innovation and specially gams are what matters.

Peope Get's PS4 because they know soon games are going to stop coming out for PS3/X360 and PS4/Xone are going to have exclusive games. Games are what matters


/thread

No not/thread, saying hardware doesnt matter makes zero sense.  Both matter and are critical, without hardware you have nothing to play software on.o determines what devs can and cannot do.

 

With hardware advances we would not have the large worlds and possibilities we have to with games.


Large worlds and...


Do you need me to speel it out? if not for hardware we would still be playing pong. Bigger worlds, better AI, interconnectiviy, graphics, physics, effects, immersion, sound, onine features. more advancements in every area. Not to mention gives devs more freedom to do things they simply could not before.

 

 

I guess wii nun chucks had zero to do with wii's success? Thats hardware allowing software to do new things.



Around the Network
Ponyless said:
Mystro-Sama said:
Ponyless said:
Mystro-Sama said:
Ponyless said:

Oops i thought i copy and pasted the entire comment, my mistake. And limits creativity lol? Have you played 3D world? Probably not seeing your previous comments. Creativity has nothing to do with power lol, play FF13 and compare it to FF6 or FF7 and tell me if you honestly think that still.

 

You make it sound as if it's just graphics lol Look at games like knack and resogun. They may look simple but current gen consoles can't run them. Too many objects moving in real time. What are you going to tell me now? That knack and resogun aren't creative and original ideas?

I've read some stuff about knack, a reason why it couldn't run on ps3 is because of the multiple partricle effects on Knack's body. IMO the game would still be the same without them wouldn't they be? Or are you telling me knack would be a completely different/inferior game if it didn't have those particle effects on his body. I don't know about resogun so tell me what is it that makes it only work on PS4 and nothing weaker than that?

 

Its the in the post you just quoted, Dude. -.-

And i asked you if those things are important to the game? Would you enjoy resogun a lot less if it didn't have all the particle effects? Would you call people delusional if they enjoyed a resogun that didn't have those particle effects because they ported it to PS3/PSV for some reason.

Read my post please.

Would wii have been a success if the hardware that allowed motion not been implemented? It matters..a lot.

Hardware advances allowed things liek Ds to exist. Without hardware 3d, and small lcd screens and tech getting smaller ds doesn't exist.



How can hardware limit dev creativity when all "creative" games today are indie games? Or when SuperMarioGalaxy was a more "creative" game than 99% of all 360 an d PS3 games combined?

Creativity knows no boundaries. If you know creative ways to find solutions to your hardware limitation then you automatically know how to make creative games. You either are creative or not. And if you are hardware does not matter because you will find a way to make it work. (I am not talking about running skyrim on Gameboy here... but about having sufficient hardware ressources and using them)



JazzB1987 said:
How can hardware limit dev creativity when all "creative" games today are indie games? Or when SuperMarioGalaxy was a more "creative" game than 99% of all 360 an d PS3 games combined?

Creativity knows no boundaries. If you know creative ways to find solutions to your hardware limitation then you automatically know how to make creative games. You either are creative or not. And if you are hardware does not matter because you will find a way to make it work. (I am not talking about running skyrim on Gameboy here... but about having sufficient hardware ressources and using them)

 

This is a one sided view. Also not all creativity is indies please. hardware and software have to work together, without one the other doesn't exist. The notion that one of them doesn;t matter is utterly foolish.

Would wii have been a success if the hardware that allowed motion not been implemented? It matters..a lot.

Hardware advances allowed things like Ds to exist. Without hardware 3d, and small lcd screens and tech getting smaller ds doesn't exist.

 

If hardware didnt matter we'd still be playing PONG.

 

 





spemanig said:
I'm a Nintendo fan. I think graphics don't matter. I think art style matters. I think performance does matter. I thought the Zelda Wii U tech demo was boring. I don't want Zelda for Wii U to look anything like the tech demo because that's not what Zelda is about. I think that Super Mario 3D World is beautiful because of it's art style. I think Super Mario Galaxy looks better because of it's art style.


what is it about ? why cant you get what u want from zelda why others get a more grown up visual zelda.



Around the Network
FlamingWeazel said:
Ponyless said:
Mystro-Sama said:

Its the in the post you just quoted, Dude. -.-

And i asked you if those things are important to the game? Would you enjoy resogun a lot less if it didn't have all the particle effects? Would you call people delusional if they enjoyed a resogun that didn't have those particle effects because they ported it to PS3/PSV for some reason.

Read my post please.

Would wii have been a success if the hardware that allowed motion not been implemented? It matters..a lot.

Why are you using the wii as an example lol, read the first post:

I often hear arguements like "it's not the hardware it's what you do with it" which is so fucking stupid and backwards and only said to damage control for Nintendo when the only reason Nintendo makes underpowered systems is to generate more profit (which they don't even need) at the cost of limiting the creativity of their devs. There is no one way gamers benefit from this shit.

He's not talking about different hardware that allowed motion control, he's very strictly talking about graphical power only, and other things that come with a stronger gpu/cpu. 



FlamingWeazel said:
160rmf said:
FlamingWeazel said:
160rmf said:
Uabit said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Uabit said:

Then fuck consoles and everyone to the PC to play Full HD or even 4k and buy cheaper games in Steam Offers. Hardware doesn't matter, if not consoles would be dead long time ago


Whya re peopel buying ps4's then? Why not just play games on PS3?? The entire industry is driven by hardware saying it doesn;t matter is simply fantasy. Most of software sales were games that are on last gen...............


Why did PS2 being a lot less powerful than Gamecube/Xbox sell a lot more consoles? Or Wii being a lot less powerful than X360 and PS3? Innovation and specially gams are what matters.

Peope Get's PS4 because they know soon games are going to stop coming out for PS3/X360 and PS4/Xone are going to have exclusive games. Games are what matters


/thread

No not/thread, saying hardware doesnt matter makes zero sense.  Both matter and are critical, without hardware you have nothing to play software on.o determines what devs can and cannot do.

 

With hardware advances we would not have the large worlds and possibilities we have to with games.


Large worlds and...


Do you need me to speel it out? if not for hardware we would still be playing pong. Bigger worlds, better AI, interconnectiviy, graphics, physics, effects, immersion, sound, onine features. more advancements in every area. Not to mention gives devs more freedom to do things they simply could not before.

 

 

I guess wii nun chucks had zero to do with wii's success? Thats hardware allowing software to do new things.

 

Ok fine... games have evolved with advanced hardware, we are not playing pong anymore, we have transited to 3d graphics that had allowed to new possibilities, but now?

 

What are the new possibilities with this generation?



 

 

We reap what we sow

Ponyless said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Ponyless said:
Mystro-Sama said:

Its the in the post you just quoted, Dude. -.-

And i asked you if those things are important to the game? Would you enjoy resogun a lot less if it didn't have all the particle effects? Would you call people delusional if they enjoyed a resogun that didn't have those particle effects because they ported it to PS3/PSV for some reason.

Read my post please.

Would wii have been a success if the hardware that allowed motion not been implemented? It matters..a lot.

Why are you using the wii as an example lol, read the first post:

I often hear arguements like "it's not the hardware it's what you do with it" which is so fucking stupid and backwards and only said to damage control for Nintendo when the only reason Nintendo makes underpowered systems is to generate more profit (which they don't even need) at the cost of limiting the creativity of their devs. There is no one way gamers benefit from this shit.

He's not talking about different hardware that allowed motion control, he's very strictly talking about graphical power only, and other things that come with a stronger gpu/cpu. 


So the wii doesn't fit your argument, so you downplay it.... Sorry hardware matters a lot, saying otherwise is foolish.

 

Its not just motion you ignored the rest of my post. Without hardware advances, handhleds dont ecxist, motion doesn't. Bigger worlds, better games, ai, effects, online connectivity, more immersion.

 

OPne cannot exist without the other, saying one is not important is piure fantasy.



Cost of owning a fully functional Wii U for six years: $300
Cost of owning a fully functional PS4 for six years: $700

Yes, Nintendo's strategy generates more profit, that's right. For the sake of thoroughness, XBO costs $860 over a six-year period.



Hardware matters but software is more important. I like what Nintendo does, to say that having that mentality is being cultured, the same could be argued about your hardware mentality, your cultured!

As a gamer, I don't care about specs of a system as much as i care about how much I enjoy the games. If I cared about hardware so much, like others pointed out, I would buy a bad ass pc. I bought all 3 consoles because I LOVE video games and appreciate what all three offer me in content.

Why worry about someone else enjoying a weaker system? And why consider them cultured?

Not everyone thinks and feels the same about everything. Many people have just as great of an experience playing video games on Wii U as they do on Ps4 and X1. If anything you sound very narrow minded only focusing on hardware innovation being high specs.