By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - killzone shadowfall or ryse:son of rome.which one has the best graphics? poll added

 

which has the best graphics?

ryse:son of rome 52 25.37%
 
killzone shadowfall 103 50.24%
 
see results 49 23.90%
 
Total:204
Mummelmann on 11 November 2013

I still haven't seen either of them in front of me, on screen and with an actual gamepad in my hands but I think it's Ryse.



Around the Network
Dr.EisDrachenJaeger on 11 November 2013
Shinobi-san said:
I think ryse looks better...but funnily enough i think killzone is technically better if that makes sense?


Ryse is the one that's technically better. Its just some of the technical stuff is kinda drab in the background. Like the global illumination. As you can see the character models are pretty damn snazzy. KIllzone has some environments that dont look up to part with everything elese, and its noticeably jarring, Ryse is uniform. It being on rails is really allowing it to push some pretty stuff



globalisateur on 11 November 2013
HokageTenshi said:

Ryse > Killzone Shadow Fall ( graphics comparison )

Reason : 900p small map in order to able to perform more graphics effect vs 1080p huge map with lots of gameplay direction 

I see a paradox here.

/Activate sarcasm detector full mode...

I see.



PeterSilenced on 11 November 2013

Ryse looks better i mean it is crytek...



HokageTenshi on 11 November 2013
globalisateur said:
HokageTenshi said:

Ryse > Killzone Shadow Fall ( graphics comparison )

Reason : 900p small map in order to able to perform more graphics effect vs 1080p huge map with lots of gameplay direction 

I see a paradox here.

/Activate sarcasm detector full mode...

I see.

I edited my opinion clearer...

If you feel its a sarcasm comment then i would like to learn more from you teacher...



Around the Network
Ninjahound101 on 11 November 2013

Ryse



bet with ash3336 he wins if Super Mario 3D World sells less than Mario Sunshine during the first three years, I win if 3D World outsells Sunshine's first 3 years. Loser get sig controlled for 3 months (punishment might change)

Do you doubt the WiiU? Do you believe that it won't match the GC?

Then come and accept this bet

Nintendo eShop USA sales ranking 2/12/2013 : http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=173615

bubblegamer on 11 November 2013
oni-link said:
bubblegamer said:
oni-link said:
bubblegamer said:
Killzone hands down.


You must be a die-hard Sony fan to say otherwise?  Ryse is on another level compared to SF!!!

Ironic, coming from you!

You're the most biased person i know on VGChartz.com.


lol...yeah sure I'll take that!!! Though it takes one to know one right buddy?

I'll take that as an admission then.



foodfather on 11 November 2013

In some trailers, KZSF looks phenomenal, but on certain other streams and gameplay vids, it hardly looks next gen at all bar from a few neat lighting effects and set piece moments. Aim for the highly unnecessary bench marks of 1080p and 60fps could be the reason why. Withouth this, KZSF would probably look a whole lot better. On a side note, I think people are forgetting how good KZ3 actually looks. KZSF really does look like the same game, but with more colour. 

Ryse gets my vote, I think its the best looking game next gen, but its just an adventure game, it doesn't really compare with the grphical detail and fidelity required in an FPS game.

I'd say overall, BF4 looks better than both, certainly a lot more than KZSF.



bananaking21 on 11 November 2013
JayWood2010 said:
JoeTheBro said:

It's like comparing pickles and cucumbers.


What if I think they are grapes and grapefruit? ;P

what if i think they are like banana's and penises? 



fighter on 11 November 2013
Shinobi-san said:
fatslob-:O said:
JoeTheBro said:
Killzone's better resolution and frame rate give it an advantage right out of the gate. It also has great particle effects.

Outside of that though, they are completely different styles. It's like comparing pickles and cucumbers.

Killzone looks more technically impressive by the fact that it's areas and draw distance is alot bigger while also sporting more AIs on screen at a time. This furthers even more by the fact that it has better physics and a higher resolution along with framerate. 

Ryse probably has the best textures and character models and that's what counts most when it comes to better graphics. 


Agree with this.

This is like in 2010 when we did comparisons between god of war 3 And uncharted 2. God of war has a drawback in that it has a static camera.

In this case Ryse seems to be a very cinematic game with small levels/environments with pre defined set pieces. Killzone on the other hand has gone for a much more open/free style comparad to previous iterations....the levels are quite big and you can go wherrver you want whenever you want.

nope

http://s.pro-gmedia.com/videogamer/media/images/xboxone/ryse/screens/ryse_4.jpg

https://static.squarespace.com/static/51d31cb7e4b0141aacb53a2c/5262a490e4b03006c796096d/5262a552e4b03006c7960b0c/1382196563932/112.gif?format=1500w