I really can't understand why people keep saying about ps4/x1, the only thing that sony fans can do is speaking about specs, when their games doesn't look anything VASTLY superior than the other consoles
We reap what we sow
How about it is it all about Nintendo games and not about speculate specs? | |||
Hell yeah I'm with you i... | 103 | 44.98% | |
Nah I love arguing with a... | 20 | 8.73% | |
It's about the games...b... | 54 | 23.58% | |
quality over quantity thu... | 51 | 22.27% | |
Total: | 228 |
I really can't understand why people keep saying about ps4/x1, the only thing that sony fans can do is speaking about specs, when their games doesn't look anything VASTLY superior than the other consoles
We reap what we sow
oni-link said: LOL...funny how haters are still trying to get Nintendo fans to argue about specs even on this thread. The point to this is that IT DOESN'T matter how many polys the Wii U is pushing as Wii U games will be able to craft visually appealing games in HD!!! The Wii U's deficiency to PS4 (esp in the case of the X1) won't matter as all consoles will have very similar effects and the difference won't be as drastic as Wii vs X360!!! Besides I don't care how many polys the Wii U is pushing when I am playing games that look like this: |
Dude...just stop. Hes basically saying the same thing. Stop worrying about graphics. Graphics are one thing but this gen Nintendos problem will be more than just a simple thing like graphics.
S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
Zzzzz...
We reap what we sow
when did Nintendo gamers ever care about specs, unless it equalled to better gameplay (Super Mario 64 over PS1 3D platformers)
ktay95 said: when did Nintendo gamers ever care about specs, unless it equalled to better gameplay (Super Mario 64 over PS1 3D platformers) |
They care about it. Trust me if Nintendo was to dominate with gameplay, sales and have graphics they would be explain how great their graphics are no different from a Sony or Microsoft fanatic. With Nintendo it doesn't really matter, as graphics expand their art style gets prettier (as far as aesthetic). I love how Mario Kart is looking and being a gen behind doesn't mean shit for Nintendo because as I said before their games are mostly made around art style. Its not like Crytek who has to have every single game be so photorealistic to the point where it trumps all creative instinct. I've had this issue with them since Crysis one.
S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
don`t worry, nintendo has the quality covered. it`s sony and MS who have to worry about it,because slightly pretier graphics won`t do anymore.
Zero999 said:
don`t worry, nintendo has the quality covered. it`s sony and MS who have to worry about it,because slightly pretier graphics won`t do anymore. |
Quality is something i've Never had to worry about with Nintendo. Their problem is mostly third party support. The deals they are making with Platinum is smart, but I would've use a different more notable company to westerners to be more profitable, but Nintendo nailed themselves in the coffin with third parties for this gen for sure.
I know it's hard for you to think outside of your narrow and simplistic worldview, and I'm sorry that we can't all be hardcore gamers like yourself, but did you ever think that maybe, just maybe, someone would prefer artistic style graphics to photorealistic style graphics? I bet it irks you that not every game looks like Call of Duty, Battlefield, Assassin's Creed, etc.
Kane1389 said:
Sorry,if the game doesnt have good ''shaders and all that crap'' than it cant be considered a graphically impressive game. This is graphically impressive This isn't |
I know it's hard for you to think outside of your narrow and simplistic worldview, and I'm sorry that we can't all be hardcore gamers like yourself, but did you ever think that maybe, just maybe, someone would prefer artistic style graphics to photorealistic style graphics? I bet it irks you that not every game looks like Call of Duty, Battlefield, Assassin's Creed, etc.
softcoregamer82 said:
I know it's hard for you to think outside of your narrow and simplistic worldview, and I'm sorry that we can't all be hardcore gamers like yourself, but did you ever think that maybe, just maybe, someone would prefer artistic style graphics to photorealistic style graphics? I bet it irks you that not every game looks like Call of Duty, Battlefield, Assassin's Creed, etc. |
Dont wind yourself up about it. Upping graphics is a undisupted truth, but art style is purely subjective. If you like something dont let a comment throw you off from that. As factual as upgraded graphics are its still an issue I have with Crytek. Their games bore me to tears. There are worse looking shooters graphically that have a much better art style especially when you enhance the graphics. Again, that is just my subjective opinion even though I know Crytek are the kings of graphics, because thats just a fact.