By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Battlefield 4 might run at 60fps on next-gen consoles, according to DICE

fillet said:
It better bloody well run at 60fps, anything less on a next gen console (especially with the PS4 specs) is not good!


I feel so, too. I don't care if it is 720p or 1080p, especially not with decent aa. But framerate is much more important to me. 720p60 >>>>>> 1080p30 in my opinion.



Around the Network

This would mean 720p, which is fine provided the AA is very good.



'Might'?



superchunk said:
Shinobi-san said:

Superchunk, there is no difference between laptop GPU's and desktop GPU's.

Quite frankly the only difference (talking AMD here) is the core clock speed. Usually what AMD does is take a series of GPU's from say desktop mid range, downclock the core speed and call it a series higher when moved over to a laptop or "M" variant. You making as if there is architectural differences between the GPU's, there usually isnt unless the mobile gpu is based on an older desktop version. AMD does not develop the GPU's independantly.

The best example of this is the 7970M gpu. This GPU is based on the "Pitcairn" gpu ie. 7870 and 7850 desktop gpu. In fact it is the EXACT same gpu as the 7870. Exact. One difference = core clock speed tweaked down from 1000mhz to 850mhz.

So what about the PS4 you say? Based on the PS4 specs that we know it is sitting pretty much exactly like this ---> 7850 < PS4 GPU < 7870/7970M

Granted the PS4 has some major customisations like the added memmory bandwidth which is higher than both the 7870/7970M. We also obviously know about the increased amount of memory which is 8GB. There are also other smaller tweaks which result in a give and take on performance compared to the above mentioned GPU's. Other than that this is the exact same gpu also based on pitcairn. Have a look at the gpu architecture drawings and you will see what i mean.

The final big similarity is that of the overall performance. The ps4 gpu has almost 2tflps of raw computation performance. This is exactly between the 7850 and the 7870/7970M gpu's. Exactly.

So please tell me what mobile gpu you are talking about? Keep in mind that the 7800M series is a downclocked version of the 7700 desktop series. These gpu's have raw computation power of ~0.8tflps. 

And to make this entire argument completely useless, both Sony and AMD have already announced that the PS4 gpu has 18 full GCN cores. This is two more cores than the DESKTOP 7850 gpu and 2 less than the DESKTOP 7870 gpu.

Again il reiterate 7850 < PS4 GPU < 7870/7970M.

If you already knew this then my bad. However i get the feeling your understanding of mobile laptop gpus is a bit off.

THey do more than just down clock it. Either way, I never said it was different architecture. I've always maintained that it was the same just lower-power and lower-cost.

No they really don't. Like i said the 7970M is a downclocked 7870. There is no other difference. None whatsoever.

And yeah you didnt quite say they are different architectures but you implied it multiple times in other threads. You keep talking about a mobile variant. What do you even mean when you say that? Theres just no reason to describe a desktop gpu as a mobile variant when the only difference is clock speed....

And like Netyarose has explained quite nicely their is no "mobile variant" GPU that has the same performance as the gpu in the PS4 except for the 7970M which happens to be a desktop 7870. Now take into account that most people have compared the PS4 gpu to a desktop 7850 which is also a downclocked 7870 with less GCN cores than the PS4 (making the PS4 gpu bigger!) your mobile gpu ranting is a bit strange to say the least.

Either you thought their is some fundamental difference between laptop gpu's and desktop gpu's which there isnt in this case, or nothing you actually said made any sense at all.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

superchunk said:
Shinobi-san said:

Superchunk, there is no difference between laptop GPU's and desktop GPU's.

Quite frankly the only difference (talking AMD here) is the core clock speed. Usually what AMD does is take a series of GPU's from say desktop mid range, downclock the core speed and call it a series higher when moved over to a laptop or "M" variant. You making as if there is architectural differences between the GPU's, there usually isnt unless the mobile gpu is based on an older desktop version. AMD does not develop the GPU's independantly.

The best example of this is the 7970M gpu. This GPU is based on the "Pitcairn" gpu ie. 7870 and 7850 desktop gpu. In fact it is the EXACT same gpu as the 7870. Exact. One difference = core clock speed tweaked down from 1000mhz to 850mhz.

So what about the PS4 you say? Based on the PS4 specs that we know it is sitting pretty much exactly like this ---> 7850 < PS4 GPU < 7870/7970M

Granted the PS4 has some major customisations like the added memmory bandwidth which is higher than both the 7870/7970M. We also obviously know about the increased amount of memory which is 8GB. There are also other smaller tweaks which result in a give and take on performance compared to the above mentioned GPU's. Other than that this is the exact same gpu also based on pitcairn. Have a look at the gpu architecture drawings and you will see what i mean.

The final big similarity is that of the overall performance. The ps4 gpu has almost 2tflps of raw computation performance. This is exactly between the 7850 and the 7870/7970M gpu's. Exactly.

So please tell me what mobile gpu you are talking about? Keep in mind that the 7800M series is a downclocked version of the 7700 desktop series. These gpu's have raw computation power of ~0.8tflps. 

And to make this entire argument completely useless, both Sony and AMD have already announced that the PS4 gpu has 18 full GCN cores. This is two more cores than the DESKTOP 7850 gpu and 2 less than the DESKTOP 7870 gpu.

Again il reiterate 7850 < PS4 GPU < 7870/7970M.

If you already knew this then my bad. However i get the feeling your understanding of mobile laptop gpus is a bit off.

THey do more than just down clock it. Either way, I never said it was different architecture. I've always maintained that it was the same just lower-power and lower-cost.

And honestly, where did your "7850M" comment come from? Im really interested.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Around the Network
Shinobi-san said:

And honestly, where did your "7850M" comment come from? Im really interested.

The APUs use low-cost low-power GPUs and CPUs. The low-cost low-power GPU is the "M" or "D" classes AMD uses. It seems obvious that the GPU will relate far more to a mobile class GPU than the desktop. If its just downclocking, then so be it. However, from the details it looks like it loses other things like CUs and so forth.

As for the above specific quote, this is why my comparison thread has "HD7XXXM" as the GPU type. Which specific model, I haven't labelled as I dont' know and AMD/Sony haven't stated specifically. If I've ever put the rest of the digits, its usually in a quote from someone else. However, based on many, I think the HD78XXM is probably closer distinction.

My point with calling it a mobile GPU is just that. Its a low-cost low-power GPU which is by definition, the mobile series.



Can't say it often enough.

1080p30FPS for singleplayer
720p60FPS for multiplayer

please !



superchunk said:
Shinobi-san said:

And honestly, where did your "7850M" comment come from? Im really interested.

The APUs use low-cost low-power GPUs and CPUs. The low-cost low-power GPU is the "M" or "D" classes AMD uses. It seems obvious that the GPU will relate far more to a mobile class GPU than the desktop. If its just downclocking, then so be it. However, from the details it looks like it loses other things like CUs and so forth.

As for the above specific quote, this is why my comparison thread has "HD7XXXM" as the GPU type. Which specific model, I haven't labelled as I dont' know and AMD/Sony haven't stated specifically. If I've ever put the rest of the digits, its usually in a quote from someone else. However, based on many, I think the HD78XXM is probably closer distinction.

My point with calling it a mobile GPU is just that. Its a low-cost low-power GPU which is by definition, the mobile series.

APU's can use whatever they want. As in the PS4's case it uses a desktop level GPU. There is no "mobile" equivalent, there is no low cost, low power gpu with the performance level of the PS4 gpu that exists today. Please get it right.

The 7970M is not low power or low cost, considering that its the same gpu as the 7870 this explains why. Your mobile talk is really just ridiculous now. And I wasnt talking about your comparison thread. In a recent other thread you directly called the ps4 gpu the 7850M and went as far as to bold the M. And like i said that is waaaaaaaaaaaaaay off. Are you understanding yet or still gonna keep on with the same thing?



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Barozi said:
Can't say it often enough.

1080p30FPS for singleplayer
720p60FPS for multiplayer

please !

A choice between both at any time would be great, but probably too much to ask.

edit: actually this would cause imbalances in multiplayer... 



Andrespetmonkey said:
Barozi said:
Can't say it often enough.

1080p30FPS for singleplayer
720p60FPS for multiplayer

please !

A choice between both at any time would be great, but probably too much to ask.

edit: actually this would cause imbalances in multiplayer... 


Theres no ways Sony invested that much in its gpu and vram to be playing games at 720p. 1080p will be easily achieved by the PS4 in both single player and multiplayer. If they want to do 60fps and the game is too demanding they will simply pull back on the IQ. They wont move down to 720p.

I know this sounds like jusy my opinion, but if Sony was going to do 720p games there are other more suited gpu's for that. With lower power and cost.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|