e=mc^2
Nintendo and Playstation Gamer.

Wagram said:
|
Oh you poor thing. Did I hurt your feelings when I said that pirates probably end up supporting the industry more than you did? I'm sure there is a word for people who do not change their mind even in the face of overwhelming evidence. Can't quite think of it, you should look it up.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835

greenmedic88 said:
You've managed to convince yourself that piracy produces more revenue for the companies producing the content being pirated in addition to believing that the more heavily people pirate, the more legit products they pay for. In other words, the world's biggest pirates contribute more to the gaming industry than those who simply pay for whatever they want to play. Congratulations. |
People say "Screenshots or it didn't happen", or "Where's your data?".
Now we are presented with various studies and still your head is in the sand? I could just imagine how you would have been during the time Galileo proposed heliocentrism.
Piracy is an anomaly in the whole process of selling a commodity. It is a circumvention developed by the comsumer to get away with a copy of the product for free. However not all "pirates" are the same. Some are simply cheap/poor/has no legal access and never intend to buy in the first place, while some use piracy as a means of trying the product. Anyway, I'm not going to elaborate, as I am sure this topic has been discussed innumerable times in this forum and all over the internet. We have studies presented here, and what matters next is the validity of these studies.
vlad321 said:
Oh you poor thing. Did I hurt your feelings when I said that pirates probably end up supporting the industry more than you did? I'm sure there is a word for people who do not change their mind even in the face of overwhelming evidence. Can't quite think of it, you should look it up. |
I own over 250 games, a majority of them in this generation now that I EARN, and buy them. I don't steal them, and decide if it's worth buying later or not. If I can't pay for them, I can't get them. It's that simple.
Also there is a word for pirates: Douche.
KhinRunite said:
People say "Screenshots or it didn't happen", or "Where's your data?". Now we are presented with various studies and still your head is in the sand? I could just imagine how you would have been during the time Galileo proposed heliocentrism. Piracy is an anomaly in the whole process of selling a commodity. It is a circumvention developed by the comsumer to get away with a copy of the product for free. However not all "pirates" are the same. Some are simply cheap/poor/has no legal access and never intend to buy in the first place, while some use piracy as a means of trying the product. Anyway, I'm not going to elaborate, as I am sure this topic has been discussed innumerable times in this forum and all over the internet. We have studies presented here, and what matters next is the validity of these studies. |
I'd say look it up yourself, but we already know where your quasi-religious beliefs in regards to software piracy lie, so
A) you wouldn't
B) even if you did, you would only look at the opinions and studies that support your own beliefs
Real simple.
greenmedic88 said:
I'd say look it up yourself, but we already know where your quasi-religious beliefs in regards to software piracy lie, so A) you wouldn't B) even if you did, you would only look at the opinions and studies that support your own beliefs Real simple. |
No, I did not say I supported the results of studies. I said the next step is to find out the validity of these studies. Your judgment about my "quasi-religious belief about software piracy" is ultimately wrong. I simply stated a fact: Not all "pirates" pirate for the simple reason of getting a copy of the game without obligations. I'm aware that in some cases, piracy boosts sales, while in others it led to bankruptcy on the part of the developers.
Unfortunately for you, your "Real Simple" approach towards this led you to a wrong conclusion about me.
| vlad321 said: In today's day and age of absolutely, horrifyingly, ridiculously shitty, overhyped games piracy seems to be the only way to actually see if the game is good, or as is the case significantly more often than not, just hyped up by a lot of dumb sheep. Maybe if there were proper demos this wouldn't be as big of a problem. |
Or just proper reading of several reviews and a good understanding of your own preferences could do the trick, but no, thats too hard for many people nowadays as it requires reading skills.
Apart from that in this day and age most games are actually "good". There's hardly any games that are unplayable and only few that control so bad that you can't have any fun with them, but the true "gems" are still as rare as in the past, as most games stick to "tried and true" (creating lesser versions of known blockbusters) and while that can produce "gems" through a lot of refinement it's still easier to be wowed by sth thats completely new.
Slimebeast said:
They can buy an Xbox 360. I care more about genuine exclusivity in the console war than the few PC gamers who buy their games. Besides, PC gamers have tons of exclusives and they get 95% of multiplatform games released. |
I buy my games and I'm a PC gamer. What's your point?
Rol RubangB First Post Boobies! Obama - antichrist Zelda HD Experience Direct Feed screenshot 1080p Next Gen Graphics Whores
Computers [UPDATED 2 december 2012]

![]()
Khuutra said:
That neither explains nor justifies how you present your own buying habits for PC games. |
What do u mean? It's a fact that most PC games are pirated. It's got nothing to do with me, I just happen to follow the same pattern as the majority.
