By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Is it just me or are the visuals of Dark Souls REALLY ugly?

 

Does it look Butt Ugly?

Yes it looks butt ugly 6 13.95%
 
It's not that bad 6 13.95%
 
Not great, not terrible either 12 27.91%
 
Wha-chu talkin' bout Willis? Game's pretty! 15 34.88%
 
Best looking game of 2011...FACT 3 6.98%
 
Total:42
Ajescent on 11 January 2012

I swear Demon's Souls was a better looking game by a strong margin. The close up of your character when they are in cell looks horrendous, almost like a game from the start of this generation whilst everything else just looks really underwhelming. Sure I'm only at the start but still..sheesh...



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

Around the Network
badgenome on 11 January 2012

Yes, because the Xbox version held it back. Multiplatforming is killing this industry.



Mad55 on 11 January 2012

Yea what badgenome said the 360 version killed it lol.



Ajescent on 11 January 2012
badgenome said:
Yes, because the Xbox version held it back. Multiplatforming is killing this industry.

Not sure if serious.



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

Hynad on 11 January 2012

For an open world game, I think it looks quite good.



Around the Network
gameonbro on 11 January 2012

blame it on xbox not the company... RAGE runs 60fps on the 360 30 on ps3 blame the 360 for slowing it down lol...



Barozi on 11 January 2012

Pretty much the same for me.
Both games aren't what I'd call beautiful.



SnakeDrake on 11 January 2012

Its just you



 

Bet with gooch_destroyer, he wins if FFX and FFX-2 will be at $40 each for the vita. I win if it dont

Sign up if you want to see God Eater 2 get localized!! https://www.change.org/petitions/shift-inc-bring-god-eater-2-to-north-america-2#share

ModifiedDuck on 11 January 2012

The game looks just fine to me... definitely better than Demon's Souls.



Come join our video game music rumble! Everybody is welcome!

http://forums.ffshrine.org/f63/official-video-game-music-rumble-66118/

We vote on our favorite music from various categories we have created. Currently doing: "Best PS2 Soundtracks". More to come!

Hynad on 11 January 2012
gameonbro said:
blame it on xbox not the company... RAGE runs 60fps on the 360 30 on ps3 blame the 360 for slowing it down lol...


Either my sarcasm meter is completely off, or you just have no idea what you're talking about...

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-rage-analysis/

Performance: The performance aspect of RAGE is a little more one sided. Both versions of the game managed to play the game with minimal screen tearing, so we have good news there. For the most part both versions also played with a frame rate very close to the targeted sixty frames per second. The difference between these two versions boils down to when shit hits the fan in heavy fire fights. Neither version tears in these events, however the 360 version suffers from a noticeable drop in frame rate. The PS3 with a partial install was able to manage a solid sixty frames per second when things got heavy, but the 360 version dropped anywhere from ten to fifteen frames under pressure. The good news is that even at forty-five frames per second, the motions never really seem choppy. When you get right down to it though, the PS3 version is a smoother experience with a solid sixty frames per second in all situations, giving Sony the edge they need to strike back by taking the performance category.