By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Against the grain: What Nintendo SHOULD have done/should do with the Wii

Killiana1a said:
Gamerace said:
Killiana1a said:

Next generation the Blue Ocean will have many shades of red because there will be no new Blue Ocean unless Nintendo can sell games to dead people.


That's a ridiculous statement.   While there's no question of Wii's success, there's still a huge market for them (or someone else) to capture.   I work in an office full of single women and all of them at one point or another mused about getting a Wii.  None did.   While Wii did succeed, it also fell short of the target.   Wii Music/Animal Crossing where two of the biggest missed opportunities in the history of gaming.    If they had gotten them right (Wii Music more accessible, fun and AC more like Farmville) then they would have continued to be sold out all 2009.

There's a whole lot of blue ocean left to win.  I don't see Kinect as doing much, except selling to 360 owners, so the wife can play too.    The real expander of the industry at the moment is Apple with ipad/phone/pod games.

Problem with Wii is people got it to experience new games - that is, all new viseral experiences.  Wii Sports did that, so did Wii Fit,  Red Steel (although it was broken), Mario Kart Wii, Shaun White, Tiger Woods, Just Dance, etc.    Nintendo missed the mark with Wii Music then just seemed to run out of ideas and recycle - Wii Sports Resort, Wii Party (Mario Party) and old franchises.   If they continued to provide new viseral experiences they would have continued to win over new players.

The real failure of Move/Kinect is so far neither has produced anything really 'new' either.  Mostly just recycled Wii games.

The great thing about the 'core' market is they'll buy the same damn game every year with a slightly different story and slight improvements.  See Madden and Call of Duty.   Casuals will buy a new experience once.  Sequels very rarely surpass the original on Wii (has it ever happened?) but they do all the time on 'core' HD games.   Nintendo failed to produce 'new' experiences for too long on Wii.  But as soon as they do again, be it on Wii or Wii2, you can bet people will buy.

Believe me, I have my doubts whether Kinect and Move can sustain without their advertising campaign. How well Kinect and Move encroach in the Blue Ocean will be evident by summer of 2011.

As for the 'core' market who will "buy the same damn game every year..." do you hold the same standard to Nintendo users eating up any Mario, Zelda, Metroid or Donkey Kong game? If anything, those 4 Nintendo franchises provided the blueprint for Madden and Call of Duty.

Donkey Kong Country Returns is nothing but the old Donkey Kong Country recycled with the same music, no crocs, same story regarding the lost banana horde, and on. Every Zelda game you can count on it having an open world with dungeon-based gameplay where every dungeon has a master key, compass, map and dungeon item used to defeat the dungeon boss. Mario games, 2D or 3D, are the same where it each level is to get from point A to point B collecting coins, same goombas from the NES game, bowser, a princess in peril and on. Metroid same deal.

All successful franchises and sequels are just new iterations off the original phenomenon. They tweak here and there, but they rarely if ever fundamentally change the gameplay. Games like Super Mario RPG, which I love to death are the exception.

Dont' even compare those franchises.  There have been 11 Metroid games (excluding trilogy) since 1986, equating to a metroid game every 2.18 years.  On the other hand, there have been 8 CoD (Cod 1-4, WaW, MW2, BO and MW Mobilised) games since 2003, equating to one CoD game every 0.88 years.

It's also worth noting that all 8 CoD games can be all classified into one genre (FPS), while Metroid can be divided into 4 catagories (Side scrolling adventure, FPA, Pinball and 3rd person Action).  To say Metroid provided the blueprint for CoD is not only wrong but the argument comes across as a bit ignorant.




Around the Network
MrT-Tar said:
Killiana1a said:
Gamerace said:
Killiana1a said:

Next generation the Blue Ocean will have many shades of red because there will be no new Blue Ocean unless Nintendo can sell games to dead people.


That's a ridiculous statement.   While there's no question of Wii's success, there's still a huge market for them (or someone else) to capture.   I work in an office full of single women and all of them at one point or another mused about getting a Wii.  None did.   While Wii did succeed, it also fell short of the target.   Wii Music/Animal Crossing where two of the biggest missed opportunities in the history of gaming.    If they had gotten them right (Wii Music more accessible, fun and AC more like Farmville) then they would have continued to be sold out all 2009.

There's a whole lot of blue ocean left to win.  I don't see Kinect as doing much, except selling to 360 owners, so the wife can play too.    The real expander of the industry at the moment is Apple with ipad/phone/pod games.

Problem with Wii is people got it to experience new games - that is, all new viseral experiences.  Wii Sports did that, so did Wii Fit,  Red Steel (although it was broken), Mario Kart Wii, Shaun White, Tiger Woods, Just Dance, etc.    Nintendo missed the mark with Wii Music then just seemed to run out of ideas and recycle - Wii Sports Resort, Wii Party (Mario Party) and old franchises.   If they continued to provide new viseral experiences they would have continued to win over new players.

The real failure of Move/Kinect is so far neither has produced anything really 'new' either.  Mostly just recycled Wii games.

The great thing about the 'core' market is they'll buy the same damn game every year with a slightly different story and slight improvements.  See Madden and Call of Duty.   Casuals will buy a new experience once.  Sequels very rarely surpass the original on Wii (has it ever happened?) but they do all the time on 'core' HD games.   Nintendo failed to produce 'new' experiences for too long on Wii.  But as soon as they do again, be it on Wii or Wii2, you can bet people will buy.

Believe me, I have my doubts whether Kinect and Move can sustain without their advertising campaign. How well Kinect and Move encroach in the Blue Ocean will be evident by summer of 2011.

As for the 'core' market who will "buy the same damn game every year..." do you hold the same standard to Nintendo users eating up any Mario, Zelda, Metroid or Donkey Kong game? If anything, those 4 Nintendo franchises provided the blueprint for Madden and Call of Duty.

Donkey Kong Country Returns is nothing but the old Donkey Kong Country recycled with the same music, no crocs, same story regarding the lost banana horde, and on. Every Zelda game you can count on it having an open world with dungeon-based gameplay where every dungeon has a master key, compass, map and dungeon item used to defeat the dungeon boss. Mario games, 2D or 3D, are the same where it each level is to get from point A to point B collecting coins, same goombas from the NES game, bowser, a princess in peril and on. Metroid same deal.

All successful franchises and sequels are just new iterations off the original phenomenon. They tweak here and there, but they rarely if ever fundamentally change the gameplay. Games like Super Mario RPG, which I love to death are the exception.

Dont' even compare those franchises.  There have been 11 Metroid games (excluding trilogy) since 1986, equating to a metroid game every 2.18 years.  On the other hand, there have been 8 CoD (Cod 1-4, WaW, MW2, BO and MW Mobilised) games since 2003, equating to one CoD game every 0.88 years.

It's also worth noting that all 8 CoD games can be all classified into one genre (FPS), while Metroid can be divided into 4 catagories (Side scrolling adventure, FPA, Pinball and 3rd person Action).  To say Metroid provided the blueprint for CoD is not only wrong but the argument comes across as a bit ignorant.

I shouldn't pick on Metroid, I know I fell in love with the series as Super Metroid was my very first SNES game. Picking on Metroid when lined up with the likes of Donkey Kong, Mario, and Zelda is like picking on the red-headed stepchild. It was great when it first came out, was downhill until Metroid Prime, became great again with Prime, and then Sakamoto slaughtered the franchise with Other M. Completely unfair, I know should not be kicking it when it is down.

Call of Duty...Do we really want to agree in our mutual bashing of Call of Duty 2k10? Seriously, Activision is milking this cow faster and harder than their previous sacred cow they slaughtered called Tony Hawk.

Thankfully, Activision will kill the Call of Duty series before EA is done with the Battlefield series. I have games from both, with my latest being Black Ops. However, I do prefer 10 rounds of Bad Company 2 over 10 rounds of any Call of Duty game any day of the week because you have to play as a team in Battlefield games to win, while one low-down camper can win an entire match in a Call of Duty game.

One FPS prizes teamwork, which the US military lives and dies by. The other FPS (Call of Duty) is just a bunch of disparate individuals getting together to boost their self esteem via their kill/death ratio.



Bobbuffalo said:
homer said:

I disagree. Sony has shown how talented their 1st party developers are this gen. In fact I may be so bold to say that in terms of quality, they have at least matched Nintendo and maybe even exceeded them.

You gotta be kidding me.

Uncharted, GT5, LBP. Modracerds whatever...good games? sure why not but all of them doesn't have a candle against nintendo.

Neither uncharted, nor ratchet and clank nor LBP nor Killzone nor GT5 nor Modracers have atracted new gamers nor pushed hardware. Those games just sell to Sony fans while NSMBWii, Mario Kart, Zelda and the Wii-XX line sell to everybody. Not for nothing those games keep selling while the others don't. Have you seen ordes of non-gamers, elapsed gamers and old gamers along with the core gamers rushing to the stores to buy LBP or modracers? HAH!

And no my dear is has nothing to do with brand power. Many games by Nintendo with their mascots have failed on sales and popularity. Is simply one thing:experience.

Nintendo has years of experience making games, using technology as a mean and not the end (wii sports, wii fit= while sony just pushes games to take advantage of technology. (GT5, Move)

Keep loving your Sony FP games but don't mix apples with watermelons. Keep it real.

Uncharted and GT5 alone > everything nintendo has to offer



Antabus said:
Bobbuffalo said:
homer said:

I disagree. Sony has shown how talented their 1st party developers are this gen. In fact I may be so bold to say that in terms of quality, they have at least matched Nintendo and maybe even exceeded them.

You gotta be kidding me.

Uncharted, GT5, LBP. Modracerds whatever...good games? sure why not but all of them doesn't have a candle against nintendo.

Neither uncharted, nor ratchet and clank nor LBP nor Killzone nor GT5 nor Modracers have atracted new gamers nor pushed hardware. Those games just sell to Sony fans while NSMBWii, Mario Kart, Zelda and the Wii-XX line sell to everybody. Not for nothing those games keep selling while the others don't. Have you seen ordes of non-gamers, elapsed gamers and old gamers along with the core gamers rushing to the stores to buy LBP or modracers? HAH!

And no my dear is has nothing to do with brand power. Many games by Nintendo with their mascots have failed on sales and popularity. Is simply one thing:experience.

Nintendo has years of experience making games, using technology as a mean and not the end (wii sports, wii fit= while sony just pushes games to take advantage of technology. (GT5, Move)

Keep loving your Sony FP games but don't mix apples with watermelons. Keep it real.

Uncharted and GT5 alone > everything nintendo has to offer

Galaxy games>everything Sony have to offer.

Your point being?



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Just as a side note (because we seem to have gone off topic here!), the Wii will be the best selling home console in 2010 according to VGchartz;

Wii is currently first with 14,422,385 copies sold

Then it is the PS3 with 11,927,430 copies sold

Then finally 360 with 10,719,359

 

Now, you can say "too many weeks included" or "undertracked!" or whatever, but the fact remains that the Wii will still outsell the HD twins, most likely by 3-4mil each. It may not be the "nintendominationz!" or the past few years, but then again these doomsday stories make it sound as though it hasn't sold a copy since 2006. This isn't true. Just to put things into perspective

(source-http://gamrfeed.vgchartz.com/story/83025/2010-year-on-year-sales-and-market-share-update-to-december-4th/)



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Around the Network
Conegamer said:
Antabus said:
Bobbuffalo said:
homer said:

I disagree. Sony has shown how talented their 1st party developers are this gen. In fact I may be so bold to say that in terms of quality, they have at least matched Nintendo and maybe even exceeded them.

You gotta be kidding me.

Uncharted, GT5, LBP. Modracerds whatever...good games? sure why not but all of them doesn't have a candle against nintendo.

Neither uncharted, nor ratchet and clank nor LBP nor Killzone nor GT5 nor Modracers have atracted new gamers nor pushed hardware. Those games just sell to Sony fans while NSMBWii, Mario Kart, Zelda and the Wii-XX line sell to everybody. Not for nothing those games keep selling while the others don't. Have you seen ordes of non-gamers, elapsed gamers and old gamers along with the core gamers rushing to the stores to buy LBP or modracers? HAH!

And no my dear is has nothing to do with brand power. Many games by Nintendo with their mascots have failed on sales and popularity. Is simply one thing:experience.

Nintendo has years of experience making games, using technology as a mean and not the end (wii sports, wii fit= while sony just pushes games to take advantage of technology. (GT5, Move)

Keep loving your Sony FP games but don't mix apples with watermelons. Keep it real.

Uncharted and GT5 alone > everything nintendo has to offer

Galaxy games>everything Sony have to offer.

Your point being?

That your opinion is wrong. You know, like bob the buffalo acts.



Antabus said:
Conegamer said:
Antabus said:
Bobbuffalo said:
homer said:

I disagree. Sony has shown how talented their 1st party developers are this gen. In fact I may be so bold to say that in terms of quality, they have at least matched Nintendo and maybe even exceeded them.

You gotta be kidding me.

Uncharted, GT5, LBP. Modracerds whatever...good games? sure why not but all of them doesn't have a candle against nintendo.

Neither uncharted, nor ratchet and clank nor LBP nor Killzone nor GT5 nor Modracers have atracted new gamers nor pushed hardware. Those games just sell to Sony fans while NSMBWii, Mario Kart, Zelda and the Wii-XX line sell to everybody. Not for nothing those games keep selling while the others don't. Have you seen ordes of non-gamers, elapsed gamers and old gamers along with the core gamers rushing to the stores to buy LBP or modracers? HAH!

And no my dear is has nothing to do with brand power. Many games by Nintendo with their mascots have failed on sales and popularity. Is simply one thing:experience.

Nintendo has years of experience making games, using technology as a mean and not the end (wii sports, wii fit= while sony just pushes games to take advantage of technology. (GT5, Move)

Keep loving your Sony FP games but don't mix apples with watermelons. Keep it real.

Uncharted and GT5 alone > everything nintendo has to offer

Galaxy games>everything Sony have to offer.

Your point being?

That your opinion is wrong. You know, like bob the buffalo acts.

 

Home presented an opinion as fact. So why are you going off on another user for calling that out?



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

LordTheNightKnight said:
Antabus said:
Conegamer said:
Antabus said:
Bobbuffalo said:
homer said:

I disagree. Sony has shown how talented their 1st party developers are this gen. In fact I may be so bold to say that in terms of quality, they have at least matched Nintendo and maybe even exceeded them.

You gotta be kidding me.

Uncharted, GT5, LBP. Modracerds whatever...good games? sure why not but all of them doesn't have a candle against nintendo.

Neither uncharted, nor ratchet and clank nor LBP nor Killzone nor GT5 nor Modracers have atracted new gamers nor pushed hardware. Those games just sell to Sony fans while NSMBWii, Mario Kart, Zelda and the Wii-XX line sell to everybody. Not for nothing those games keep selling while the others don't. Have you seen ordes of non-gamers, elapsed gamers and old gamers along with the core gamers rushing to the stores to buy LBP or modracers? HAH!

And no my dear is has nothing to do with brand power. Many games by Nintendo with their mascots have failed on sales and popularity. Is simply one thing:experience.

Nintendo has years of experience making games, using technology as a mean and not the end (wii sports, wii fit= while sony just pushes games to take advantage of technology. (GT5, Move)

Keep loving your Sony FP games but don't mix apples with watermelons. Keep it real.

Uncharted and GT5 alone > everything nintendo has to offer

Galaxy games>everything Sony have to offer.

Your point being?

That your opinion is wrong. You know, like bob the buffalo acts.

 

Home presented an opinion as fact. So why are you going off on another user for calling that out?


Fact, where? He stated his opinion. Buffalo-bob attacked his opinion. How am i going off..?



Antabus said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Antabus said:
Conegamer said:
Antabus said:
Bobbuffalo said:
homer said:

I disagree. Sony has shown how talented their 1st party developers are this gen. In fact I may be so bold to say that in terms of quality, they have at least matched Nintendo and maybe even exceeded them.

You gotta be kidding me.

Uncharted, GT5, LBP. Modracerds whatever...good games? sure why not but all of them doesn't have a candle against nintendo.

Neither uncharted, nor ratchet and clank nor LBP nor Killzone nor GT5 nor Modracers have atracted new gamers nor pushed hardware. Those games just sell to Sony fans while NSMBWii, Mario Kart, Zelda and the Wii-XX line sell to everybody. Not for nothing those games keep selling while the others don't. Have you seen ordes of non-gamers, elapsed gamers and old gamers along with the core gamers rushing to the stores to buy LBP or modracers? HAH!

And no my dear is has nothing to do with brand power. Many games by Nintendo with their mascots have failed on sales and popularity. Is simply one thing:experience.

Nintendo has years of experience making games, using technology as a mean and not the end (wii sports, wii fit= while sony just pushes games to take advantage of technology. (GT5, Move)

Keep loving your Sony FP games but don't mix apples with watermelons. Keep it real.

Uncharted and GT5 alone > everything nintendo has to offer

Galaxy games>everything Sony have to offer.

Your point being?

That your opinion is wrong. You know, like bob the buffalo acts.

 

Home presented an opinion as fact. So why are you going off on another user for calling that out?


Fact, where? He stated his opinion. Buffalo-bob attacked his opinion. How am i going off..?


See the words "In fact" in the very first reply in this quote train? Trust me, that is presenting an opinion as fact.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

LordTheNightKnight said:
Antabus said:


Fact, where? He stated his opinion. Buffalo-bob attacked his opinion. How am i going off..?


See the words "In fact" in the very first reply in this quote train? Trust me, that is presenting an opinion as fact.


He said that in fact he can be so bold, not that it is a fact.