So what if some people play Wii fit/sports and nothing else? What about the people that plays FPS and nothing else, or the people who plays nothing but JRPG's? You play what you enjoy, simple as that.

well, bottom line is no matter how you try to spin it, the biggest and best games are always released on the 360 + ps3.

the ONLY differentiator on wii, is thats its the only place you will find the top tier nintendo games. which so far have been, mario galaxy, brawl, mario kart, twilight princess, metroid

with soon to be released mario galaxy 2, the new zelda and new metroid.

so the points metioned above is why i have a wii, because its the only place i can play them games.

Calm down Nintendo Boys He makes come valid points. I would not say the Wii ruined this Gen, Play what you like, I will on my PS3. And no doubt these Wii games would be much better of an experience on the PS3, and there motion controller will be out soon, so look for it to make the Hardcore gamers happy with the Best of Both Worlds. Yes the truth Hurts.

I will never understand why anyone thinks paying extra for a game is worth it? (DLC)  Whoever would had made a Mario with DLC would just cut out the luigi parts, perhaps the story book, maybe even the shooting stars and made you pay 5-10 for each part. when it is what you should have gotten in the first place. Does every company do that? No, but we all know it does happen.  Online Mario Galaxy??? WTH would be the point  it is a single player game plus Wii has online that works fine. Yes, I will agree with Killeryoshis on casual hardcore phrases being stupid. It is a silly in that A lot of people enjoy many games, both types of games, and perhaps some would play more if they had time.

OT The only thing that ruined this gen for anyone is $$ plenty of great games for all systems no matter your taste.

We = gamers m8 :p

@ forest-spirit way to miss the point, those Wii Fit players wouldnt know a Duke Nukem from a Master Cheif (nothing wrong with that) those are not video game players I put WII gamers in 3 categories casuals (my girlfriend, aunty, grandma who have never touched a controller, ever) gamers (me, i like games in general, all genres) and hardcore/fanboys(eat, breath, suck off Nintendo) the casuals make up 60% of WII audience, 30% gamers, 10% hardcore.

(understand, im not trying to put anyone down for playing those games, but Wii FIt is geared toward a specific audience, its like the new exercise bike)

Actually I can understand why various people find the casual and core terms flawed as this is determined by habits not by the games you buy, I know people who play games like Wiiports Resorts quite frequently and buy such games quite often as well as people who buy the odd game every now and then which sometimes are your COD MW2s and only play it once in a while. Effectively this makes the Wiisports player more core then the latter, a game may be geared towards a specific audience but it doesn't mean that only a casual will buy and play it.

Being core has nothing really to do with knowing your Halo's or Duke Nukems it's more down to gaming habits, you can be core and strictly enjoy more casual games tbh, you can be classed as casual even if you're only playing Halo and such because your gaming habits are quite light.

So? Does it make the system any worse?

Galaxy is fine with what it is. There is no absolute need to put online or DLC. This is NOT a standard, and some people need to get it.

And how on Earth can you report me for such little thing I said! Too sensible?

It would look marginally better, yes. It would, however, not play one iota better -worse, in fact- and therefore it would not be as good of a game. There is nothing preventing the Wii from having excellent games, other than certain devs' desires to focus on pretty pictures instead of the things that matter.

His games are fresh and original like Galaxy was.

Your games must be groundbreaking!