Quantcast
Goodnightmoon's Wall
Goodnightmoon

    39,978

    L8: Wraith (15,022 until level 9)
    Goodnightmoon Finally I got a Switch with Mario Oddissey and Doom, loving the console and both games so far, great
    • A 28 year old male gamer
    • Spain
    • Joined on December 2nd 2014, last online on 15 January 2018.
    • Profile Views: 31,114
    • Forum posts: 9,769 times which averages 6 posts per day
    • User Reviews: 0 reviews
    •   VG$ 1,050.00
    Banned (Expires: 9th Jul 10)
    Permaban - Flaming (How can a user be this fucking out of touch over and over and over again? You've been a member here for close to four years now, and the only thing that has been consistent is how much of an aggressive jerk you've been with users that you disagree with. We've tried over and over to rehabilitate you and nothing is working, you're a lost cause and we no longer want you here, so I'll leave you with this poem; I'm about to play Overwatch and get a High Noon, But first I shall ban you; Goodnight, moon.) ~ Bristow9091 [8693680]

    Badges: (view all)

    Congratulations on Pressing Start! Score your first game in your collection.
    A Badge Within A Badge Earned 20 badges.
    One Piece at a Time Add your first game to your collection.
    Shipped Or Sold? 15 comments posted on VGChartz sales articles.
    Oh, I'm Just Getting Started 15 comments posted on VGChartz staff reviews.
    Hit And Run 15 comments posted on VGChartz news articles.
    Leaving Limbo 100 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
    'Ello Princess! Awarded for signing up.
    3 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 3 years.
    Pon Received 100 wall post comments on gamrConnect.
    2 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 2 years.
    Open For Business Earned 10 badges.
    Genocide 5,000 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
    Social Butterfly 50 friends on gamrConnect.

    Goodnightmoon's Wall

    < 1 - 20 of 133 <
    < Goodnightmoon updated his status:

    Finally I got a Switch with Mario Oddissey and Doom, loving the console and both games so far, great purchase.

    That ban note though lol. heh... good night moon.

    on 22 January 2018

    Hi, how's it going?

    Now that I have a little dog and a new Switch, great!

    on 14 January 2018

    Watched Baby Driver last night!

    Great, what's your opinion about it?

    on 29 November 2017

    I thought it was good all around. Technically solid, strong editing and directing. Love the musical hook, with the movie cutting and moving to the beat. Some of the characters weren't really fleshed out, though, and some of the writing was flat. Overall, I'd say it's one of Wright's weaker scripts, although his weakest work is still well above average. I'd give it a 7/10.

    on 29 November 2017

    Fair enough. I thought it was brilliantly well done, like a great pop song, every scene was made in such a percise way, its an overdose of style and it has a great rythm, loved the main character and the humour was totally on point. While the script is not one of his best ones I do think the movie as whole is around the same level as his greatest ones and it includes one of the best car chase scenes I have ever seen, so to me is more like a 8/10, I would probably put Shaun of the dead and Scott Pilgrim above though.

    on 29 November 2017

    Wright is a stud, that's for sure.

    What's on your radar now? I'm really interested in The Shape of Water.

    on 29 November 2017

    Coco, The Shape of Water, Lady Bird, Star Wars VIII and Call Me By Yor Name are probably the ones I'm looking foward the most, however Lady Bird still has not release date in Spain and both Shape of Water and Calle Me By Your Name will not be released until February so I have to wait :(

    on 30 November 2017

    < fory77 posted something on Goodnightmoon's wall:

    i rigged the poll j-just for u ❤

    Thanks lol xD

    on 30 October 2017

    < Goodnightmoon updated his status:

    As it happens with most films made by Denis Villeneuve Blade Runner 2049 was fucking awesome, loved it.

    < Goodnightmoon updated his status:

    Damn Cuphead is bloody gorgeous... and pretty brutal lol Loving it so far

    < Goodnightmoon updated his status:

    Doom coming to Switch, Fuck Yeah. Also Octopath Traveler looks superb

    Now I want the Goomba amiibo to work on DOOM and The New Colossus so that it turns the enemies into the goombas from the Super Mario Bros film.

    on 15 September 2017

    Quite an extravagant idea lol

    on 15 September 2017

    Have you seen Dunkirk? What did you think?

    Nah man, I couldn't, between people that didn't wanted to see a belic movie, people that wanted but were travelling and when they came I was the one travelling, at the end I didn't saw it at all but whenever I see it I will return here with my opinion. Did you liked it though?

    on 05 September 2017

    Yeah I'd say it's Nolan's best. There are a few nitpicks, and the movie does have a certain cold detachment (a hallmark of Nolan's works) but overall it's magnificent. Direction, cinematography, acting, and score are excellent. The editing is some of the best I've ever seen, in any movie ever.

    on 05 September 2017

    That's a lot of praise :P

    on 06 September 2017

    It sounds like we're on the same page when it comes to movies :)

    < darkenergy posted something on Goodnightmoon's wall:

    Be careful, try your best not to get moderated again.

    At this point I'm not sure if I care at all since most of my bans are so random I can't even predict them

    on 12 July 2017

    They're not random. You simply refuse to adjust and become a better contributor here. You get offended at the tiniest thing, and argue way too aggressively over the most trivial things.

    on 24 July 2017

    Bullshit, if you actyally look at my bans you'll see that's false, my last ban because of Lawlight was ridiculous, the previous ban was because I basically said "you more" to a clear attack from Azuren, and what about my ban for saying that Pewdiepie screamed like a retarded playing horror games. Half of my bans are random and based only in reputation.

    on 24 July 2017

    http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8473096 (20 days for this one)

    http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8457372

    http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8322811

    http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8258794 (10 days for using the word simpleton directed to no one)

    Take a look to some of my most recent ones and think that meanwhile horrible users like Lawlight are neverr banned.

    on 24 July 2017

    Lawlight? Nevwr banned? Lol!

    on 24 July 2017

    You can never seem to argue your points without throwing a jab at someone or a group of people.

    This has always been the way you handle things. Sometimes, you even throw a jab at people even though no negativity has yet been posted. Making sure others will catch on and react in turn.

    on 24 July 2017

    Almost never banned if you preffer.

    on 24 July 2017

    Bullshit, that's what some of you want to see, i never have flaming intentions, I post what I feel.

    on 24 July 2017

    You keep telling yourself that. It's the whole world that's out to get you for no reason. You are just the victim. You do nothing wrong. It's just "how you feel". Maybe it's more than due time for you to get a hold over your feelings and the way you express the .

    Keep that on and you'll never improve and evolve.

    on 24 July 2017

    As I said, half of my bans are because reputation, just look the recent examples. I see a lot of users writting coments like those that don't get banned and I see tons of trolls that never get banned, reputation does a lot.,

    on 24 July 2017

    Of course your history counts. You've been moderated for the same things over and over again without ever showing any signs that you're learning and are willing to adjust.

    on 24 July 2017

    That's the trap, i had a lot of fair bans when i was new, because I was adapting and thios was my first forum ever, and since then the reputation has stayed the same and mods ban me because of my historial once and once again, at the end half of my bans are just because of my historial which gets bigger with unfair bans which results in more and more bans, the circle never ends. I have a very unfair reputation, just to put you an example, several users have accused me of constantly shitting about Sony whenever i have said something midly negative about anything Ps related, the thing is, yopu can count with the fiungers of half a hand the times I have being nnegative toward Sony in the las 2 years, ask any mod, there are maybe 2 or 3 negative coments about Sony in the last 24 months and none of them were banned because they were perfectly normal comments, yet people keep coming at me fopr hating Sony when that doesn't happen, is pure reputation, half of it is false.

    on 24 July 2017

    You get banned so regularly because you're easily disagreeable and say remarkably dumb stuff, for example that "earth is flat" analogy you tried to make the other day. And when you're proven wrong, you either backpedal and pretend it was all a joke in good fun or you just pretend you're right and continue.

    on 24 July 2017

    Quite an irony that talk about saying remarkable dumb stuff, remeber when you said Arms will had a 90 on meta and that it was overhype by Nintendo fans? At the end it had a 77 and the hype was totally translated to sales. "You are never tired of being wrong?" SAlso you didn't understand at all the point I was trying to make yesterday and you made no argument because you usually have none, the others made it for you.

    on 24 July 2017

    Right, it's also quite hilarious how I came out and publicly admitted I was wrong about that as opposed to saying "I wasn't even serious, lol". The point you were trying to make is that something like "what is a good movie" isn't 100% subjective and it is. I didn't need to make an argument, because you were doing a damn good job embarrassing yourself without my assistance.

    on 24 July 2017

    You don't seem to realise that you are responsible for your reputation here. But you haven't done anything to make it change or improve it. Blaming others and complaining about how your poor self is being "unfairly persecuted" and unjustly banned, instead of being mature and man up isn't going to help you.

    Stop making any such kind of comments in the first place, however mild you may think they are. Improve you attitude, especially towards those you disagree with, and stop making stupid jabs at other people or groups.

    It's really not rocket science.

    Take responsibility for your actions and their concequences. That's what adults do.

    on 24 July 2017

    Azuren: The coment I made to Mzuzek wasn't serious, my argument about art not being 100% subjective is completely serious though, and I never said that was a joke, but you read what you want.

    on 24 July 2017

    Art is 100% subjective because everyone views it in a different way. It's not a statistic or fact you can look at and go "Yep".

    And quit backpedaling on that, because no one believes you. If it was true, your response would have only been "It was a joke", instead of claiming it wasn't serious before seriously explaining yourself.

    on 24 July 2017

    There is a number of philosophers and intelectuals that support my point about art not being 100% subjective, but I guess you think you are smarter than all of them, As I already said to you art has an objectiver basis, a series of mechanism that activate something in our brains, those mechanisms have been studied for centuries (how to structure a good story, how to compose an image, etc etc) which means art is not 100% subjective, of course this is a divisive point, but your only answer is basically "you are dumb lmao" without a single argument.

    on 24 July 2017

    Then post one.

    on 24 July 2017

    - Friedrich Schiller
    - Hegel
    - Aristoteles
    - James Mill
    - Hervert Spencer
    - etc etc etc

    Even Inmanuel Kant said that " beauty is objective and universal"

    on 24 July 2017

    Interesting that so many (six) people would seem to think that something that almost defines itself as subjective is not. It's almost like there's a reason they were seen as philosophers and not something more legitimate, like engineers.

    on 24 July 2017

    Wow, now that's the worst argument I have ever heard, do you even know who is Kant, Hegel and Aristotle? Some of the biggest minds of human history lol Aristotle is one of the most important mathematicians EVER You just exposed yourself in such a spectacular way

    on 24 July 2017

    Oh, Aristotle? Sorry, I didn't know who Aristoteles was.

    Regardless, art is subjective in spite of what any philosophers say. Just because someone says something doesn't change the fact that anyone can view any piece of art, give any critque of it they wanted, and it would be just as valid. There's no definitive right and wrong to it just because someone has more experience with it; it just makes their taste more refined.

    And no, the worst argument you heard was from yourself: "So if I say the Earth is flat my opinion isn't wrong is just unpopular, right..."

    on 24 July 2017

    Aristoteles is his real name written in our abecedary, Aristotle (which is extremelly similar) is the english way, quite a lame excuse for you specially since Kant and Hegel are equally important, you just exposed your deep ignorance to everyone, in your logic their word is not important because they weren't engineers, spectacular argument. My comparison with the argument of the flat Earth was misunderstood, yes it is technically wrong because a statement of fact is not the same as an opinion, however in my point of view (just like those philosophers I mention) there are things that can be considered facts in art, as is not 100% subjective, which is the whole point I'm making, I know it was a bad exemple though, but i'm sure you wouldn't know how to answer that if wasn't because a smart user pointed the flaw.

    on 24 July 2017

    Oh you used a word correctly, that's so weird: "ignorance" yes, because I am unlearned on the topic of philosophy. I didn't take philosophy in college, mostly because I didn't want to waste my money. So again, it doesn't matter who they are or what they said, because art is subjective in its entirety. Hell, art almost can't even be objectively defined, much less be objective in nature. And if you want to continue arguing in favor of Aristotle, let's do a quick Google search on things he said.

    What's this? Women are monstrous, some people deserve to be slaves, and...

    Eels don't reproduce?

    Must all be factual, because Aristotle could never be wrong.

    The point you were making was inherently flawed from the get-go, you just also happened to couple it with one of the dumbest things I've ever read. "The Earth is flat" is not opinion or subjective; it is something that can be proven or disproven, making it objective. "Transformers 5 is a good movie" cannot be proven, it can only be elaborated on why certain aspects didn't outweigh other TO YOU. Something you dislike can easily be liked by someone else, and that's why it is subjective. Just because you and a large number of people love Ocarina of Time doesn't mean that everyone loves it and that it is an objective fact that Ocarina is great.

    on 24 July 2017

    Aristotle making facts that later would be disproven doesn't make it any less important as he was, you said I should name some philosopher or intelectual that believed art is not 100% subjective, I named you 6 and now you move the goalpost using aritotle sexism after a quick google search, great, now let's look for every great mind that said something sexist and start to discredit everything they said because of that, looks reasonable. Also you still don't understand that i have never said taste is objective, i said it can be educated which is different, art itself has things that can be called objective, but taste is of course subjective and you can like whatever you like, something I said several times.

    on 24 July 2017

    Move the goalpost? No.

    Discredit him because he said some crazy shit? Yes.

    And "some people deserve to be slaves" is also a subjective statement, meaning it can't be "disproven". He's just fucking cooky.

    And you're backpedaling again. You said it isn't 100% subjective, and since it can't be 90% subjective without being 10% objective, you're still wrong in claiming art is partially objective. You can teach art, you guide it and share tastes so that other can cultivate their own taste. It's not like math where I can teach you 10/2=5 and that's it. You can't derive your own thoughts and feelings on what 10/2 is, because it is simply five. But you can come up with your own opinion on the Mona Lisa, even after being taught all about it. That's what subjectivity is, and art is 100% subjective. You are wrong.

    on 24 July 2017

    So following your logic every theory that every great mind did must be discredit and forgotten if they said something that today is considered politically incorrect even if it was the standar of its age, great, let's get rid of 95% of great philosophers, writters, scientist, etc sounds like a good idea.

    As for your second paragraph, that's where you and me disagree, for example, it can be proved that an image has a good image composition (something fundamental in visual arts) because this has been studied for ages, a good image composition makes your brain get the information better, it is related to the way our vision and brains works, so is not only an opinion there is some biology behind, which is considered mostly an objective science, so that alone already proves that art is not completley subjective, but taste is, you may not like that composition even if its good, because you don't like some elements on it, or because you have no interest in this area, but that doesn't mean the composition is bad, it means you don't like it.

    on 24 July 2017

    No, I'm saying that many of the famous philosophers come from drastically different time periods with radically different values, and that while some of their ideas are good, many ideas are influenced by their origin. Some are good, some serve as good guidelines, and much of it is philosophical bullshit.

    And you're not arguing the art at that point. You're arguing bad image composition. If I took Starry Night and put it on 480i blown up on a ten foot canvas, then that doesn't make Starry Night bad-mouth it makes it an inefficient medium. You're not talking about the art anymore, you're talking about resolution. And even then, guess what? An old guy with bad eyesight could look at it and see a Masterpiece. And that's what makes it subjective.

    on 24 July 2017

    And a guy who doesn't know or care about it could walk up and say it's the best thing he's ever seen. Oh wow, look at that: subjectivity.

    on 24 July 2017

    Image composition has nothing to do with resultion lol is about how the visual elements are placed in the scene which again, is fundamental in many arts. Color composition is also important, and it turns out we have an innate way to correlate some colors with some emotions so that has also an objective side.

    on 24 July 2017

    Do you even read what I write? I already said that taste is subjective twice

    on 24 July 2017

    The quality of art is determined by taste. All you're doing is saying art isn't 100% subjective because technical aspects can be objective, which isn't what art is. A piece of art doesn't have to conform to a standard, because there is no standard for art. "Bad image composition"? How do you know it wasn't intentional to convey a message? And why does everyone have to care about it just because you do? That's the subjective nature of art. Even with flaws and low scores, a game can still be seen as good by someone. And even if a game had perfect mechanics and a high score, someone can still hate it.

    Honestly, I don't even know what kind of mental gymnastics you're doing in your head to continue this. The mere fact that someone can simultaneously hate Ocarina and love Dynasty Warriors should be enough to tell you that it's subjective, but you just keep arguing a point that gets toppled by mentioning "but someone could like it dislike that without being incorrect in doing so".

    on 24 July 2017

    There are no mental gymnastics, I keep talking about the nature of art, you keep talking about taste and we are not gonna get to any agreement because there is a clear tension between both of us that transforms every debate in a battle, which leads no way and makes us win nothing, so, since we are going no way and since this tension is not going down, I honestly think we should just stop quoting each other and stop comunication in general, maybe with time we realize we aren't as disgusted to each other but right now we are, so I propose you to let it be.

    on 24 July 2017

    You're arguing technique. You're arguing medium. You're arguing philosophy. But you don't seem to understand that it all means dick if a parent can treat the crude stick figure drawing of his child like gold. Art is subjective, and just because some decide to examine objective aspects of the technique or something similar, the art itself is unchangingly subjective.

    on 24 July 2017

    Art is the expression of someone based on one's own sensibilities, experiences and interpretations.

    In and of itself, the very nature of art is indeed subjective.

    The level of mastery of the techniques used to achieve the artwork, on the other hand, can be objectively measured. Yet even those can be appreciated or not, or preferred over other techniques, by any given one individual.

    on 25 July 2017

    So you don't want to let this go... ok, Technique and medium are fundamental parts of the art to a degree where they cannot be separated, you can love the draw your kid made pissing on the snow, and you are right to do it if that the experience it provokes you, but that still a bad draw that probably doesn't even represents what the kid tried to drawn since he has no technique to do it.

    on 25 July 2017

    And survey says:

    HOLY SHIT, IS IT STILL SUBJECTIVE? NO FUCKING WAY!

    on 25 July 2017

    Hynad: It comes from subjective feelings, of course, but there are objective ways to make your message come across better with your art, is not only what you express is also the way you express it and this has a lot to do with technique.

    on 25 July 2017

    You mention the nature of art. I explained to you the nature of art. Having studied visual art, I think I may know a thing or two about the subject.

    But feel free to contradict everything I say. It's all subjective anyway.

    on 25 July 2017

    Having studied audiovisuals and worked in that area too I also know a thing or 2 about it you know? in art the way you express something is just as important as what you express if not more and the way you express something is related to technique which can be objective to a certain degree thus making it not 100% subjective.

    on 25 July 2017

    And then literally anyone could walk up and claim to like something that you feel is objectively bad and throw your entire argument in the shitter where it was clearly born.

    on 25 July 2017

    The technique isn't an art. It's a mean by which the artist achieves his vision..

    Clair-obscure isn't an art in itself, for example. It's the way by which the artist can rely on to convey an emotion or mood for his piece.

    It can be sketchy, extremely smooth, made with complementary colors, pointillism, or whatever.

    The technique isn't important. What's important is what comes off the art piece when someone looks at it. How clearly it conveys what the artist had in mind. And that, only the artist knows fully. The rest of the world speculates and muse based on their own individual sensitivities.

    on 25 July 2017

    The technique itself is not the art but art needs the technique, if a draw is supposed to express movement but the technique is bad then it doesn't represent that movement thus making the picture worse, the artist couldn't represent his thoughts/ideas/emotions right as he didn't had the technique to do it.

    on 25 July 2017

    < Goodnightmoon updated his status:

    VGC that place where they ban you for saying something bad about pewdiepie but you can be trolling 24 hours 7 days of the week and the only ban you'll see will be for the person that dares to say something to the troll. Because logic.

    What did you say about pewds?

    on 11 July 2017

    I literally said: "...several horror games had way more success thanks to him because he screams like a retarded and people find it funny"

    I was banned several days for that.

    on 11 July 2017

    Here you can read the post: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7494967

    on 11 July 2017

    You were banned for casually throwing around the word retarded at a time when the mod team was moderating for that. Not for saying "something bad about pewdiepie". I've explained this to you several times now. It was two years ago. Time to move on.

    on 11 July 2017

    But is does represents very well the nonsense going on here, you guys follow guidelines in such a literal way sometimes the outcome is downright absurd, what if you go after the trolls instead of going after the people that gets angry with them?

    on 11 July 2017

    I would never understand how you deserve to be banned for using the word "retarded", specially when you are not a native speaker, however you don't deserve to be banned for trolling everyday just because you are being polite.

    on 11 July 2017

    not getting into your moderation but you're definitely right about pewds. if he was just himself he definitely wouldn't be half as popular if even that. the guy is basically an act and not genuine.

    on 11 July 2017

    < LipeJJ posted something on Goodnightmoon's wall:

    Can't believe we're still not friends here!

    I really thought we were

    on 09 June 2017

    < Cloudman posted something on Goodnightmoon's wall:

    Heya, I'm here to say something similar to radishhead, haha. At this point, you're better off just stopping with anything Color Splash related. You're pretty much arguing against a brick wall. I'm sure you've seen I've tried as well, with no success. Better off just walking away and sticking with what you know.

    Agree, is not worth it anymore. I'm not even trying to say that the game is amazing, but to say that is trash is simply very unfair specially when it comes from ignorance, game was too fun to be bad.

    on 26 May 2017

    Yeah, I feel about the same. It makes me sad when people say this about the game, as I feel it's a really great game that is unfairly criticized because it looks like Sticker Star. I just have to sit back and take the hits now, since people won't be changing their minds any time soon.

    on 27 May 2017

    You must be excited about Owlboy :D

    Well I have already played it but when I get my Switch I will download it again for sure, I'm, specially happy because I know the game is gonna have very good sales on Switch, better than on Steam where sales were a bit too slow.

    on 26 May 2017

    I know I'm snatching it up as soon as it launches :)

    on 26 May 2017

    < radishhead posted something on Goodnightmoon's wall:

    It's not even worth arguing against some of the people you confront in the Horizon thread - they haven't played Zelda, they have no intention of ever playing Zelda and therefore cannot have their opinions changed. Having said that, I respect your commitment!

    You are right

    on 26 May 2017

    < Wright posted something on Goodnightmoon's wall:

    I didn't mean to sound challenging or confrontational in the WiiU thread the other day, by the way. Re-reading now it might give that impression.

    Oh no, don't worry. I sound way more confrontational usually even when is not my intention, I understand.

    on 06 April 2017

    I blame VGC. Sometimes posts can be read as overly serious because it's hard as heck to attach a tone to them.

    on 06 April 2017

    I was not talking about you btw. You like to stalk my wall?

    Yes, beautiful wall, I'm there all day

    on 28 March 2017

    There is no need for this, classic.
    Being rude will not help.

    on 28 March 2017

    Where do you think BotW will land among your top games?

    I need to give it time to have a more "objective" point of view, because right now to me is the best game I have ever played. I haven't finished it though, 75 hours in and I still have 3 out 4 dungeons to complete and 10 memories to find xD Half of the map is still undiscovered

    on 25 March 2017

    Yeah, it's right there for me too. What's your current #1?

    on 25 March 2017

    Metroid Prime and Portal 2 probably, cannot chose one, I played both recently and they seem to me as brilliant as always. With Zelda is probably Wind Waker and A Link to the Past, both usually are in my top 10 but to me BoTW is destroying Wind Waker in every sense so I think I can say with confidence that is my favourite 3D Zelda and probably my favourite Zelda period. What games are currently in yours?

    on 25 March 2017

    My top three right now are Ocarina, Deus Ex, and Halo: Combat Evolved. The most recent game to crack the top 10 was Xenoblade Chronicles. But it looks like BotW will crash in also. Might jump right to the top spot :)

    on 25 March 2017

    Yeah it may go directly to the top 1 for me too, right now is giving me that impression, is such a brilliant game, is even better than I thought despite my epic expectations.

    on 25 March 2017

    < Ka-pi96 posted something on Goodnightmoon's wall:

    You have an avy? :O

    Finally! Can't help but suspect every person without an avy being an alt

    I have been here for a long time man, I'm not an alt :P But yeah I usually have the same impression with people that doesn't have an avy

    on 23 March 2017

    People that edit the default blank avy are twice suspicious!

    on 24 March 2017

    Hey! Thanks for the friend request!

    You are welcome ^^

    on 02 March 2017

    < 1 - 20 of 133 <

    Currently Playing

    Started on 05 October 2017

    Started on 05 October 2017

    Game Stats

    • 11 total number of games
    • 0 games in common
    • 9.6 average game rating
    • PSP favourite console (3 games)
    • Role-Playing favourite genre (3 games)
    • 0% of games completed