Bofferbrauer2 said:
Thanks for the links. Don't know how that endorsement ranking is supposed to work out, though. Plus, the list seems pretty outdated compared to the ones on Wikipedia, especially Bernie's endorsements are very trunkated while there are enough to warrant a separate page on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election#Endorsements_2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bernie_Sanders_2020_presidential_campaign_endorsements |
Endorsements in the past were a valid indicator, but not the last word. Taking endorsements as indicator works well, if the endorsements are pretty strong for one candidate without other candidates getting also a lot. 538 explains it: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/were-tracking-2020-presidential-endorsements-heres-why-they-probably-still-matter/
The differences to the endorsement-tracker on Wikipedia is, that 538 only counts current office holders (with few exceptions like past presidents) and also only few office holders in regional offices (like state congress). Wikipedia lists them all, even if they never held political office, like songwriters or actors. This is in part, because 538 puts a 'value' on the endorsement, the ones not counted would be assigned 0 points. This system allows it to beforehand know the pool of possible endorsements and calculate a percentage, as they already do for calculating the persentage of endorsements from different states the candidate gets in the shown map. So 538 seems to have listed all endorsements from US-congressmen to Bernie Sanders and other office-holders they appoint points to, like representatice Rho Kanna or senator Patrick Leahy, but not from state legislature like Rhode Island State senator Sam Bell.