By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - PS3 "Others" numbers doesn't make sense

Wait the Sony shipped numbers... Feb 4.



Around the Network
donsterydo2 said:
@haxxiy: If you're such a smart guy start tracking for yourself worldwide sales.

If the numbers are 1 m off so what ? What is the difference for You if it's 32m and not 31m or 36m instead of 37m ?

People stop making fools of yourself !

I think you are smart enough to know shit well that I would have no damn means of doing it except waiting three months for official data and then subtracting half a million or so which is what VGC usually seems to do by the way. And if you don't care for number discrepances then why the hell you are even here by the way? Go do something in your life that you actually care then.



 

 

 

 

 

Ninky Nonk said:
haxxiy said:
TheSource said:

On the contrary, the UK is 30% of the European market for the big three on average.

Not counting the UK in Others is like saying Sony counts California and the other 49 USA states seperately. The UK is simply a portion of Europe...

Our figures are fine.

So the figures are fine if they are lagging millions and millions behind shipped numbers!?

The guy has a point on being worried damn. What if PS3 and X360 on VGC became like PSP numbers in the future, 10 millions below official shipped figures?


No the guy does not have a point. He though the UK was counted seperately to Europe which was the reason for him making this thread.

I'll refrain from commenting on my view of such a a mistake (I would receive a ban).

Don't try and support such a mistake it makes you look desperate and silly.

Read it again dude. His logic was flawed, yes, but he was not far from the truth on saying there was something wrong with the numbers. Why don't you go ahead and comment on it? If you would receive a ban for a comment on a simple mistake then I think that it is clear who would sound desperate and silly here.



 

 

 

 

 

It does not make any sense to me, in the OTHERS colum, it is wrong, I don't know if its undertracked or what but , according to all my other research these new numbers are incorrect.



Just wait for Sony to post their numbers. Everyone knows PS3 is under-tracked now, the only people that argue with this is xbox fanboys Koweniki, and seece



Around the Network

^lol

OT

Of course it is under tracked. They won't get all the sales numbers.




Sephiroth357 said:
^lol

OT

Of course it is under tracked. They won't get all the sales numbers.

They extrapolate!!!! Why do loads of people think that all these things are undertracked  because not all the data is provided, they extrapolate, which is why it is an estimate



Munkeh111 said:
Sephiroth357 said:
^lol

OT

Of course it is under tracked. They won't get all the sales numbers.

They extrapolate!!!! Why do loads of people think that all these things are undertracked  because not all the data is provided, they extrapolate, which is why it is an estimate

I know its a projection.




Sephiroth357 said:
Munkeh111 said:
Sephiroth357 said:
^lol

OT

Of course it is under tracked. They won't get all the sales numbers.

They extrapolate!!!! Why do loads of people think that all these things are undertracked  because not all the data is provided, they extrapolate, which is why it is an estimate

I know its a projection.

So why does the fact that they don't have all the sales numbers mean that it will be undertracked? And my comment is not entirely directed at you



My guess is that Microsoft paid VGC 50mil to have PS3's numbers undertracked.



Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1