By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Bitterness in the Wii fandom?

Kenryoku_Maxis said:
Ail said:
NJ5 said:
Ail said:
NJ5 said:

How bitter would PS3 and 360 owners be if third parties spent years launching "test games" to see if they were worthy of getting more high-profile, high-quality games?

How bitter would they be if those same third parties ignored the fact that several high-quality PS3 and 360 games sold well, and decided to launch their following games on the Wii, completely forgetting their previous successes on the PS3 and 360?

How bitter would they be if 3rd parties and the industry in general used niche games and spin-offs as "proof" that PS3 and 360 owners don't deserve getting better games?

 

If the games we wanted were not on our platform of choice we would have purchased another console long ago...........

I don't go to Subway to purchase a cheeseburger, I go to Wendy's or Mc Donalds :P

So your point is, PS3/360 fans are shining beacons of rationality and pragmatism while Wii fans are irrational and unbalanced whiny fanboys?

 

My point is that it's been quite clear for a while that Wii wasn't going to get the same kind of games as HD consoles.

If those are the games you want, buy the platform that has them...

Ever hear any console owner complains they are not getting MMOs ?

Nope, people that want to play those play on the PC....

 

If I want to play Mass Effect or Halo as a PS3 owner, I'm not going to start a petition online or bitch like mad about pulbishers, I will purchase a 360....

Wii fans aren't saying games like Mass Effect or Halo should be on Wii.  Only a select few people are saying that and frankly, they aren't looking at the big picture.  Since the Wiis conception, most people have looked at the Wii for what it was and realized the Wii had true potential to do one of two things.  Either be limited to games with Wiimote controls (like WiiSports/Zelda: Twilight Pricess) or be a system where developers could basically do anything they want if they put forth the effort.  And as we have seen, when developers actually put forth the effort, they can create games that practically do whatever they want on the Wii.  Its not about graphics or being HD, its about effort from these third party developers. 

Nintendo themselves have shown us this, certain third parties have shown us this.  Its just that the majority of third party companies have chosen to only give the Wii casual/party/mini-game titles or smaller titles with limited budgets (The Conduit, Blom Blox, Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles, etc) and then whine that they don't sell as well as a game on the HD consoles/Nintendo internal titles.

Thw Wii never was a system where developers could do anything they want if they put forth the effort.  What third party developers want most of all is a system with enough power that they could use the readily available engines and focus on the content instead.  The Wii is so underpowered, if a developement team goes that route, they pretty much have to code everything with just the Wii in mind.  That would only happen if Nintendo had moved Wii upmarket.  But Nintendo got greedy, and in the third year of the life cycle, they focussed solely on things like Animal Crossing, and Wii Music, and then shifted focus again to Wii Fit.  If Nintendo had instead released a new hardcore IP that year, the picture today would be very different.  They should have led the way, because unlike other third parties Nintendo's top teams will only focus on the Wii.  How may AAA story drive games gas Nintendo done lately?  Sony was in a similar situation with dwindling support on PS3, but they pushed their first part and exclusive titles to the limits to make PS3 turn around.  They led by example, and now third parties have come around.



Around the Network
Kenryoku_Maxis said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Kenryoku_Maxis said:
Metallicube said:
Alterego-X said:

I have a strange feeling. 

Maybe it is just me whose perceptions changed, but I could swear, that nowadays the whole Nintendo community, and not just on this site, is a lot more supportive to Nintendo and hostile to 3rd parties than ever before, for example, a year ago.

 

In the past, there was cheerful optimism about all upcoming core third party games, and some blaming of Nintendo for not helping to get even more third party games. 

Nowadays, everyone starts to sound like Malstrom: "The Industry Must Die!", "None of them could make any good enough games!",  "Everything on-rails sucks!"

Even on generic core news sites, like Eurogamer, a comment pointing out how retarded Ubisoft is, and their best franchises should have Wii versions, can get voted up. 

Is it just me, or there is something in the winds?

Simple case of every action has an equal and opposite reaction.. Industry has turned hostile towards Nintendo and its fans, so its fans have responded by turning hostile to the industry.

Well considering the 'industry' (as in third parties) really started doing this on the N64, its actually been going on for well over 10 years.  The fact that Nintendo fans have been putting up with it this long is pretty amazing.  I mean, we went an entire system (GameCube) pretty much going 'good games are coming, we can wait'.  And now we've gone 3 YEARS thinking 'The Wii is outselling everything, third parties will eventually make the switch'.  But instead, third parties have done every thing possible to use, skip or even blatantly blame the Wii for bad support.  This is no longer something even a 'casual' fan can overlook.  The third parties are purposefully skipping over Nintendo systems.  Even to the point of some of those companies losing money to do it.

The thing is many of us knew Nintendo was slipping with those systems. The Wii is a success, and when the third parties are refusing to reward that success with proper support, and reward the HD systems for losing billions, I personally would like to smack some heads.

But I personally wouldn't call the N64 or the GC Nintendo 'slipping'  On the contrary, I would call it Nintendo trying to cater to the fans.  Focusing on graphics, better outputs (for their time) and everything else.  The N64 was the better system graphically and the GC was on par with the XBOX.  In all ways, Nintendo was in the position of the 'HD' systems of today.  Yet it didn't get the third party support.  Now Nintendo took the opposite approach, going low tech, high profit like the PSX, PS2 and got the rewards like those systems did while the other systems took the path of the N64/GC and are losing marketshare/money.  Still, Nintendo is being shunned by third parties.

I think we've been given a clear sign by third parties and the fans.  Fans will go to the cheaper system, but third parties just hate Nintendo.

That is the big issue.

For one thing, Capcom couldn't wait to port as many of their "exclusive" GC games to the PS2 as they could. Now the only return they've given so far to the Wii was because they wanted to fix the flaws in that game, NOT because they felt the system should have more support.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

Vertigo-X said:
theprof00 said:
Vertigo-X said:
 

 

Yes, grilled cheese is delicious... Except when you use some nasty tasting cheese, that is. The problem is, Threepee is using low quality ingredients to save money and is expecting good results. The rest of it doesn't make sense:

 

1.)  You're implying that the reintroduction of the old sandwich directly impacted the sales of Threepee's sandwiches. I believe here you're trying to imply that New Super Mario Bros caused a direct decrease in the sales of third party games? Correct me if I'm wrong but that assertion would be utterly stupid..

Not caused, will cause. Give it time

2.) Island in the Pacific? Ten possible ingredients? Are you trying to  blame this on the distributor (publisher) and not the Wiideli?

Or maybe the cap on how much the sandwich is capable of being "different"

 

 

1.) Okay, any particular reason for that thinking? Proof, as it were?

 

2.) Then what are you blaming here? The Wiideli? As far as I'm aware, it hasn't restricted Threepee in how he chooses to make his sandwiches.

So you want the staple and most regarded games ever to grace gaming  to be made on the least impresive hardware so that everyone (Gamers, Publishers, Developers, Analyst) compares them to the games that are using the best hardware and as a by product of that they would be reducing the franchise appeal and loose the praise and recognition that they have built for a long time.

 

You think that if Acti-Blizzard brings WOW to the WII and cuts the PC version the MMO fans will go to the WII? Nope they will find something else to play on the PC.

You think that if Acti-Blizzard brings COD to the WII and Cuts the HD Console/PC versions FPS fans will go to the WII? Nope they will find something else to play on the PC/console.

Do you think that if CAPCOM brings Biohazard to the WII and Cuts the HD Console/PC versions survival horror/action fans will go to the WII? Nope they will find something else to play on the PC/console.

Do you think that if konami brings MetalGear to the WII and Cuts the HD Console/PC versions stealth/infiltration fans will go to the WII? Nope they will find something else to play on the PC/console.

I could do this all day, you think gamers like the games just because of the Names and thats not the case, those games are the more highly regarded games and they have a huge fanbase because they are pushing the limits of what is posible on the  PC/console, and if they go to the WII yes sure people will buy it but it would sell less than what it does on the systems that are best suited to the habilities/capabilities of the developers and the audience that they know how to entice to buy their games en masse, it would harm their brand and prestige doing the exact opposite of what they have become famous for.

 

WII owners Stop asking for imaginary games, the only type of support that you were going to get on the WII is not with the main entries of the big frachises, for that reason you have nintendo. Instead you are getting great games and new IP that you completly ignore while you complain for games that will never come. If you want the type of games that are on the other consoles but still like the WII get a complementary system (HD Console/PC) if you can, if you cannot keep your complains to yourselfs as we gamers Dont care and cannot do anything, Sent emails directly to the Publishers/developers  of the games that you want on the WII or make you on website/forum to complain about it and Stop Making a CessPool of complaints in all the gaming forums, Thats pathetic, even worst when the WII has great Games on its own that are neglected while forum babies complaint about why imaginary game X doesnt get a main entry on the WII.

Enjoy your  great games and forget about the rest.



rajendra82 said:
Kenryoku_Maxis said:
Ail said:
NJ5 said:
Ail said:
NJ5 said:

How bitter would PS3 and 360 owners be if third parties spent years launching "test games" to see if they were worthy of getting more high-profile, high-quality games?

How bitter would they be if those same third parties ignored the fact that several high-quality PS3 and 360 games sold well, and decided to launch their following games on the Wii, completely forgetting their previous successes on the PS3 and 360?

How bitter would they be if 3rd parties and the industry in general used niche games and spin-offs as "proof" that PS3 and 360 owners don't deserve getting better games?

 

If the games we wanted were not on our platform of choice we would have purchased another console long ago...........

I don't go to Subway to purchase a cheeseburger, I go to Wendy's or Mc Donalds :P

So your point is, PS3/360 fans are shining beacons of rationality and pragmatism while Wii fans are irrational and unbalanced whiny fanboys?

 

My point is that it's been quite clear for a while that Wii wasn't going to get the same kind of games as HD consoles.

If those are the games you want, buy the platform that has them...

Ever hear any console owner complains they are not getting MMOs ?

Nope, people that want to play those play on the PC....

 

If I want to play Mass Effect or Halo as a PS3 owner, I'm not going to start a petition online or bitch like mad about pulbishers, I will purchase a 360....

Wii fans aren't saying games like Mass Effect or Halo should be on Wii.  Only a select few people are saying that and frankly, they aren't looking at the big picture.  Since the Wiis conception, most people have looked at the Wii for what it was and realized the Wii had true potential to do one of two things.  Either be limited to games with Wiimote controls (like WiiSports/Zelda: Twilight Pricess) or be a system where developers could basically do anything they want if they put forth the effort.  And as we have seen, when developers actually put forth the effort, they can create games that practically do whatever they want on the Wii.  Its not about graphics or being HD, its about effort from these third party developers. 

Nintendo themselves have shown us this, certain third parties have shown us this.  Its just that the majority of third party companies have chosen to only give the Wii casual/party/mini-game titles or smaller titles with limited budgets (The Conduit, Blom Blox, Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles, etc) and then whine that they don't sell as well as a game on the HD consoles/Nintendo internal titles.

Thw Wii never was a system where developers could do anything they want if they put forth the effort.  What third party developers want most of all is a system with enough power that they could use the readily available engines and focus on the content instead.  The Wii is so underpowered, if a developement team goes that route, they pretty much have to code everything with just the Wii in mind.  That would only happen if Nintendo had moved Wii upmarket.  But Nintendo got greedy, and in the third year of the life cycle, they focussed solely on things like Animal Crossing, and Wii Music, and then shifted focus again to Wii Fit.  If Nintendo had instead released a new hardcore IP that year, the picture today would be very different.  They should have led the way, because unlike other third parties Nintendo's top teams will only focus on the Wii.  How may AAA story drive games gas Nintendo done lately?  Sony was in a similar situation with dwindling support on PS3, but they pushed their first part and exclusive titles to the limits to make PS3 turn around.  They led by example, and now third parties have come around.

What does Nintendo 'leading the way' have to do with third parties jumping on board?  That got them nowhere on the N64 and GC.  And that got them nowhere on their monster first two years of the Wiis launch.  You know, when the Wii was selling out of stores upon arrival and Nintendo had games like Twilight Princess, Mario Galaxy and Smash Bros going head to head with all the major HD games.  And where did Sony or Microsoft 'lead the way' to gain the support of third parties back on the XBOX and PSX?  I see no coorilation with your 'leading the way' argument with the first part of your argument.

My statment of 'developers could do whatever they want' was meant to focus on how developers could develop games in any way they want, if they put their minds to it.  Sure, they couldn't go make some holographic game that let people jump into the Matrix and fly over the Grand Canyon at 300 FPS.  But within the Wiis boundaries, they could develop anything they wanted, if they just put forth the effort.  Instead, they just set these imaginary boundaries of 'we can only use waggle, these set resources, target these set markets and aim to sell these many units'.  And it was even a shock to the third parties when Wii games started selling well, because they expected their own games to bomb.  That's just plain sad.



Six upcoming games you should look into:

 

  

Vertigo-X said:
theprof00 said:
Vertigo-X said:
 

 

Yes, grilled cheese is delicious... Except when you use some nasty tasting cheese, that is. The problem is, Threepee is using low quality ingredients to save money and is expecting good results. The rest of it doesn't make sense:

 

1.)  You're implying that the reintroduction of the old sandwich directly impacted the sales of Threepee's sandwiches. I believe here you're trying to imply that New Super Mario Bros caused a direct decrease in the sales of third party games? Correct me if I'm wrong but that assertion would be utterly stupid..

Not caused, will cause. Give it time

2.) Island in the Pacific? Ten possible ingredients? Are you trying to  blame this on the distributor (publisher) and not the Wiideli?

Or maybe the cap on how much the sandwich is capable of being "different"

 

 

1.) Okay, any particular reason for that thinking? Proof, as it were?

on the way.

2.) Then what are you blaming here? The Wiideli? As far as I'm aware, it hasn't restricted Threepee in how he chooses to make his sandwiches.

My entire original point wasn't that the wii was causing problems. In actuality, I was making a point that metaphors were stupid and often skew reality. This is why I continued to say that everyone was making metaphors.

It's easy to make a point when you put it in a metaphor, because it's not the same thing. Additionally, the metaphor is just as complicated as the reality. Metaphors are meant to make things simpler, but here they are being used to prove a point, and that is incorrect.



Around the Network

if there was a better variety of good third party games for the Wii i would probably buy one because i got bored with zelda, mario and the lack of mature games a long time ago.
it's a shame that every stab at the wii market by 3rd parties came up pretty fruitless cause if they are rewarded when they make a quality title they would surely make another one.

all in all the whole drama revolving around this issue is bad for the industry and gamers both.



_honeybadger_ said:
Vertigo-X said:
theprof00 said:
Vertigo-X said:
 

 

Yes, grilled cheese is delicious... Except when you use some nasty tasting cheese, that is. The problem is, Threepee is using low quality ingredients to save money and is expecting good results. The rest of it doesn't make sense:

 

1.)  You're implying that the reintroduction of the old sandwich directly impacted the sales of Threepee's sandwiches. I believe here you're trying to imply that New Super Mario Bros caused a direct decrease in the sales of third party games? Correct me if I'm wrong but that assertion would be utterly stupid..

Not caused, will cause. Give it time

2.) Island in the Pacific? Ten possible ingredients? Are you trying to  blame this on the distributor (publisher) and not the Wiideli?

Or maybe the cap on how much the sandwich is capable of being "different"

 

 

1.) Okay, any particular reason for that thinking? Proof, as it were?

 

2.) Then what are you blaming here? The Wiideli? As far as I'm aware, it hasn't restricted Threepee in how he chooses to make his sandwiches.

So you want the staple and most regarded games ever to grace gaming  to be made on the least impresive hardware so that everyone (Gamers, Publishers, Developers, Analyst) compares them to the games that are using the best hardware and as a by product of that they would be reducing the franchise appeal and loose the praise and recognition that they have built for a long time.

 

You think that if Acti-Blizzard brings WOW to the WII and cuts the PC version the MMO fans will go to the WII? Nope they will find something else to play on the PC.

You think that if Acti-Blizzard brings COD to the WII and Cuts the HD Console/PC versions FPS fans will go to the WII? Nope they will find something else to play on the PC/console.

Do you think that if CAPCOM brings Biohazard to the WII and Cuts the HD Console/PC versions survival horror/action fans will go to the WII? Nope they will find something else to play on the PC/console.

Do you think that if konami brings MetalGear to the WII and Cuts the HD Console/PC versions stealth/infiltration fans will go to the WII? Nope they will find something else to play on the PC/console.

I could do this all day, you think gamers like the games just because of the Names and thats not the case, those games are the more highly regarded games and they have a huge fanbase because they are pushing the limits of what is posible on the  PC/console, and if they go to the WII yes sure people will buy it but it would sell less than what it does on the systems that are best suited to the habilities/capabilities of the developers and the audience that they know how to entice to buy their games en masse, it would harm their brand and prestige doing the exact opposite of what they have become famous for.

 

WII owners Stop asking for imaginary games, the only type of support that you were going to get on the WII is not with the main entries of the big frachises, for that reason you have nintendo. Instead you are getting great games and new IP that you completly ignore while you complain for games that will never come. If you want the type of games that are on the other consoles but still like the WII get a complementary system (HD Console/PC) if you can, if you cannot keep your complains to yourselfs as we gamers Dont care and cannot do anything, Sent emails directly to the Publishers/developers  of the games that you want on the WII or make you on website/forum to complain about it and Stop Making a CessPool of complaints in all the gaming forums, Thats pathetic, even worst when the WII has great Games on its own that are neglected while forum babies complaint about why imaginary game X doesnt get a main entry on the WII.

Enjoy your  great games and forget about the rest.

You some shill for a Wii hating developer trying to justify what they are doing? It won't work.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

"cause if they are rewarded when they make a quality title"

They are. The Wii haters just lie that the non-rewarded titles are quality and that the actual quality titles are not rewarded (like the lie of No More Heroes selling badly).



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

LordTheNightKnight said:
We won't buy $60 versions of games with weaker controls and graphics that hit the uncanny valley and are dirt brown.

You're deliberately being unfair and you know it. If you insist on continuing in this manner, so be it, but you've just forfeited the right to complain when the games you favor are painted with a similarly overbroad brush.

famousringo said:
Let me tell youa story of two delis, located across the street from each other. The Wii Deli specializes in club sandwiches, and the HD Deli makes great big deluxe submarine sandwiches.

Threepee, a sandwich maker working at HD Deli, is having a hard time making ends meet. He makes a mean submarine sandwich, but there just aren't always enough people hungry for a submarine sandwich to pay the bills.

Threepee looks across the street, and sees people lined up to get into Wii Deli. Seeing dollar signs, Threepee walks across the street and asks the proprietor if he could use another sandwich maker. The propietor agrees, noting that he's having trouble meeting demand and customers like variety.

So Threepee starts selling sandwiches, only he can't afford to buy all the ingredients that he puts into his submarine sandwiches. That should be okay, because if these people wanted a submarine sandwich, they'd be across the street anyway. He doesn't want to compete with the propietor's club sandwiches, because he thinks people will just turn up their nose and buy from him. So Threepee makes cheese sandwiches: Just a couple pieces of Wonderbread with a slice of processed cheese in the middle.

At first, things go well. Customers are tired of waiting in line for club sandwiches, so they try a cheese sandwich for a little variety. Threepee thinks this is great, and starts making more and more cheese sandwiches.

But the customers aren't enthused. Where's the tomato? The turkey? It's a little unsatisfying. So they go back to waiting in line for club sandwiches.

Threepee's response to this development is anger. He's spent a lot of money on Wonderbread and processed cheese. Rather than trying to make club sandwiches, or coming up with a sandwich that's different, but just as satisfying, Threepee angrily blames the customers of the Wii Deli for not buying his sandwiches. He tells them that he thinks they're ignorant people who don't even like sandwiches and storms out of the deli.

Now tell me, do the customers of the Wii Deli have any reason to find Threepee annoying?

 This post gets the Official Noname Seal of Approval.*

*Twenty years from now, when famousringo starts trying to also appeal to the Casual Forum Member Market, butthurt and ignorant fools will mistake the purpose of said seal.

Avinash_Tyagi said:

Name five third party games I would like on the Wii

 Little King's Story.

Monster Hunter 3.

Klonoa.

A Boy and His Blob.

Dokapon Kingdom.

Smeags said:

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

This was first posted April 1, 2008. Progress Schmogress.

 Whatever happened to Episode 8?

Lurker said:

Third parties are just being smart. PS3, 360 and PC have the bigger install base than Wii and more than 50% of the market. That's why most  third parties are making games on all 3 instead of the Wii.

 Yes.

"Smart."

Ari_Gold said:
Demotruk said:
Er, Ari, we are saying we would like stronger third party support...

How is that not admitting it?

you're an exception, most wii only owners in the site, lie to themselves and say that they're happi with the games they get .

 Those pitiful fools. If only they had your vision, standards, and honesty!

theRepublic said:

What big, core third party titles?  Resident Evil 4?  Monster Hunter 3?  Call of Duty?

What big, core third party title performed so poorly?  I can't seem to recall one.  I know quite a few low budget, niche third party games which underperformed according to this forum, but I'm not sure what games you are talking about.

 Madworld, House of the Dead, and The Conduit.

Oh wait, the games' publisher disagrees on 2/3 of those.

The Conduit, Dead Space: Extraction, and Darkside Chronicles.

Wyrdness said:
How come people are now combining PS3/360/PC userbases to calculate market share when normally it's done individually as development for each platform is financially different, is this a new trend?

 Not new.

It goes back, oh, three years or so.

Lurker said:

The Wii will never have that PS2 level of marketshare because that extra 20% or more is spread around to the HD. When PS2 was on top it had everyone on there. Casual, hardcore and whatever else. Third parties had no problem with that. The kind of games they like making sell more on HD.

 At the risk of sounding insulting, I wonder if you yourself realize how close to the mark you just struck...

SaviorX said:

The average decent HD game costs $15-30m; how many 3rd parties spent that much on a Wii game?
In terms of the games themselves, how many 3rd party Wii games are longer than 12 hours straight? Only XSeed titles....

 Underlined: One. Maybe. I'm not entirely sure about Monster Hunter 3's budget. So, maybe.

Bolded: That's a load of codswallop and we both know it.

The Ghost of RubangB said:

Threepee moves back to the mainland and works for the big submarine sandwich empire, takes out a loan to buy 100 new ingredients and introduces his biggest sandwich yet, with many Lairs and Lairs of meats and cheeses, and even adds some expensive rare giant enemy crabmeat.  When he releases his new sandwich, he invites all the food critics to come try it out, and lets them now that there's a stupid island out there full of morons who wouldn't know good sandwiches if they crawled up their ass, died, and blamed Wii Fit.

Threepee's sandwich tastes like shit, costs too much, and makes one of the food critics vomit.  Another critic says "Hey aren't you that cheese sandwich moron who said we don't know what good sandwiches are?"  Sandwich-goers of all creeds abandon him.  Threepee is now homeless.  And as he wanders the street looking for crumbs, he can look off into the Pacific, and see a great island building a glorious tower into the heavens, with new kinds of sandwiches that don't even need bread!  Some are open-faced, and some use lettuce on the outside, a crazy insult to the sandwiches of the oldschool!  But since everybody is so fat from all those giant submarine sandwiches, the Island introduces the Atkins Diet, and lettuce sandwiches take over the world.

 I strongly disagree with this continuation. Mine would go something like:

Threepee returns to the mainland, embittered by how his Kraft-N'-Cardboard Wonder Sandwhich™ failed to light a fire under the Club Sandwhich people. He vows to never again make a Club Sandwhich in his life.

Instead, he doubles down on his Submarine Sandwhich. He mortgages his properties, takes out large loans, and hires several assistants. He purchases only the finest quality ingredients from around the world. He spends weeks of feverish work planning out the most minute detail of his new Masterpeice.

In the end, his newest Submarine Sandwhich is everything he could have hoped for. He invites food critics to try his new creation (the junket includes performances by star musicians, speeches by famous celebrities, and massive amounts of free alcohol to dazzle the critics: no expense is spared!). They love it! The critics rush to their blogs and post about how Threepee's Grand Submarine Sandwhich™ is the finest thing to happen to sandwhiches since Sourdough. Armed with these accolades, Threepee now knows that he made the right choice in abandoning the Club Sandwhich store, and he eagerly looks forward to recouping his staggering investment at the public unveiling of his work of Genius.

Sure enough, when the doors to the Submarine store open the next morning, Threepee's sandwhich is a hit! Folks line up around the block just to try this newest sandwhich craze. At the end of the month, Threepee's Grand Submarine Sandwhich™ is number one on the prestigious National Best Sandwhich Sales List.©

Unfortunately for Threepee, at the start of the next month, someone else comes out with a different Submarine Sandwhich. The critics who had been raving about his life's work only days before rush to forget him; this month it's all about loving NBT's Submarine Sandwhich™ (which, the critics lament, can only be reviewed in two-inch segments, and they must agree to be flown to Tahiti and put up in 5-star resorts: woe unto he who is they!). The customers who had lined up for Threepee's sandwhiches have vanished: NBT is where it's at this month, although if you want Threepee's Grand Submarine Sandwhich,™ they're willing to sell you their refridgerated leftover copy for pennies on the dollar.

Threepee is devastated. The masses who threw their money at him on Day One are gone, and while they did give him lots of cash, it was only a fraction of the loan he had taken out to fund Threepee's Grand Submarine Sandwhich.™ The assistants he'd hired have to be let go; the properties he'd mortgaged are forfeited to the bank. Now out of a job, and deep in bankruptcy, Threepee has taken to ranting on Sandwhich forums about how his life would have been so much better if Club Sandwhich Empire had subsidized and marketed his Kraft-N'-Cardboard Wonder Sandwhich™ all those years ago, or if they would have just done their job and funded his Grand Submarine Sandwhich™ (letting Threepee keep all the profits, of course!).

He's moved back in with his mother, and now spends his spare time nibbling on Bon-Bons and watching soap operas.

Carl2291 said:

It's not possible to give them the features that were on the HD versions. We both know this.

 True, Wii games can't do zombies particularly well...

--OkeyDokey-- said:
So when do we stop blaming third parties and start blaming Nintendo for making a console that no one wants to develop for?

 Sometime shortly after we suffer a major concussion, and conclude that what developers want is more important than what customers want.

Alby_da_Wolf said:

"Everything on-rails sucks"
I normally agree with what Malstrom says when he's not intoxicated and strongly disagree when he's ranting, but if he said that about on-rails, I agree even if he was under LSD or crack.

 You could not be more wrong.

Not even if you tried really hard.

Really, really hard.

Seriously.

Ail said:

If I want to play Mass Effect or Halo as a PS3 owner, I'm not going to start a petition online or bitch like mad about pulbishers, I will purchase a 360....

 If you're only speaking for yourself, that's great.

If you're trying to say anything about the PS3 userbase...

You're going to want to pick another example.



"You're deliberately being unfair and you know it. If you insist on continuing in this manner, so be it, but you've just forfeited the right to complain when the games you favor are painted with a similarly overbroad brush."

I was responding to a comment that was already broad, the old "just buy the HD systems" comment. I was just throwing bullshit to bullshit.

Although the brown thing does turn me off a bit (not always, but with some games).



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs