http://www.n4g.com/nintendods/News-81237.aspx

Another classic. The Nintendo fanboys are going to be upset about this though. 

lol, that guy is hilarious.

that is so so true.. 

While I share some of his annoyance at Nintendo following their game formulas too closely, he really seems like he's missing the point (ie. hasn't played too many of them). The characters and themes are very similar every time, but everything else changes over the years. Well sorta...

The leaps from Super Mario World to Super Mario 64, Super Metroid to Metroid Prime and Link to the Past to Ocarina of Time were all amazing, but it's been pretty quiet after that. Super Mario Sunshine wasn't very impressive, the Metroid Prime games were pretty similar, and the biggest difference between Ocarina, Wind Waker and Twilight Princess was the visual style.

The only franchise that has started to annoy me with repetition is Zelda, and they've all been excellent games by themselves, but I think it's about time for them all to go in a slightly different direction. That seems to be exactly what they're doing, since Super Mario Galaxy looks extremely friesh, and the word about the next Zelda and Metroid is that they're going to be different as well. I'm very optimistic about the future of Nintendo's core franchises.

Excellent. He treads the line between "humor" and "legitimate, well considered complaints" quite well.

 Common , have some sense of humour ,he makes that with almost all of the games , even with Bioshock / HS / H3 etc ...

I find his segments enjoyable, although I do hate how his rants always inspire some fanboys (be they sony, microsoft, or nintendo) to either over-react negatively (if its on one of the better games of their chosen system) or justification for not buying said game or system (if it's on a system they do not own).

Frankly, all of his segments are focused (usually) on negative aspects of a game from the perspective of an adventure gamer (I say this because he makes freeware adventure games? and you can notice it in his reviews). His points are often valid to an extent, but still isn't as much as a detractor to not buy a game as to check if there's any flaw deep enough that make you think twice before getting a game.

That's basically why i haven't bothered to pick up a new Zelda game since Majoras mask... and someone gave me Majoras mask.

woooow, this is a total win! Even hero quest was in it. Epic!

and when is okami coming?

The last 3 reviews were very weak (shit IMO). It seems he is more interested in complaining about the games than making real criticism. He is not very experienced in some genres or franchises and this is evident when analyzing some of his rants. What I mean is: what is the point of using someone who hates racers to review a racing game? He would not be able to tell a good game from a bad game.