Judging by the reviews for The Last Remnant, not really. Square Enix must be really cheap.

I didn't state it was absolute. Try a major franchise that hasn't fallen from critical favor.

your whole question was how well the game would do critically if it was on the HD systems, Okey then brought forth a game that was panned by these reviewers on HD systems from the exact same company.  How is that not a fair comparison?

That was after the claim the HD games are reviewed with higher standards.

The #1 game is GTAIV. How is that "higher standard"?

YOU might not like GTAIV but it was really good. And it deserves it's spot.

wow this sucks... ign sucks anyway, im still buying it.. why? because its final fantasy bitches

It's not really about how good it was, but about things that would have docked points from most other games got overlooked, and about how reviews treated it less like a game and more like the second coming (not actually on the level of the second coming, just closer to it than reviewing it as a game).

He subjectively talked of "higher standards", I, subjectively talked about GTAIV. What's wrong with that?

I'm sick of this whining. Reviewers feel that it's a below average game. Deal with it. Some of my favourite games have been critically panned, but you're never going to see me complain about The Dark Spire having a sub-70 average, no matter how much I personally loved the game. The review scoring system might be screwed, but at the end of the day the reviewers are just people with opinions, just like us, and any conpiracy theories about website bias is a load of shit.

/rant