Well, too bad that's only going to work for the first 3 times...

As far as Dragon Age I don't think it was by accident that the console version tactics were more dumb down than the PC version. Most console gamers will play the game one time though then trade it in while a PC gamer wants a more deeper game play to continue playing Dragon Age for months to come especially with mods.

Again, like Stekstav, you are confusing 'good' with 'more games'.  And your perception of good.  Secondly, you are limiting your perception to just games released in America and under one year.  Sure, I can say PC did better than consoles in one genre in one year as well.  But over the grand scheme of things, consoles are releasing WAY more games in most genres than PC.  Lastly, more awards don't always equal more sales.  I'm talking about SALES.  Not how GOOD you perceive a game to be.  And again, that hits on your limiting your view to just games released in America under one specific time frame yadda yadda.

Heck, multiple of the games you put under PC are also on the 360 (more than just Fallout 3) and many RPGs on the 360 are soon to be on the PS3, etc. etc.  Not to mention all the RPGs for Wii never released here or soon to be released like Arc Rise Fantasia, Monando, Fragile, Tales of Graces, etc.

One compounding bit of evidence you could say that makes the PC have more RPGs than consoles however is the literally thousands of small studio and independently made RPGs on PC.  Much of these are, once again, made in Japan and are either Anime or Hentai based and some making their way to handhelds.  But its up to you if you are going to count those.

Also, MMOs are considered a genre now.  I have no idea what this 'technology' nonsense is.  That's like saying 'Strategy' is a technology because it can be attributed to multiple sub-genres like tactical and real time.  MMO is a genre with multiple sub-genres.

If people, like me and million others, can change their FPS from "keyboard & mouse" to "controller" im sure it can be done for MMO and RTS.

The best MMO I have played to date is Phantasy Star Online, and it used a controller, on a console, back in 2001. (though hopefully Star Wars: The Old Republic will totally blow it away).

True, I prefer playing many games on PC, specifically flight sim games, simulation games and even MMOs most of the time.  But you go where the good games are.  Not just sit with your hands folded staring at one gaming device and saying 'this is the only good one, only games made for this are good'.

Question 1: The OP claimed that two genres would keep the PC alive.. two game genres that is hard for developers to make decent on Consoles, right? Why? Because they wouldn't sell well, or because they wouldn't play well?

Question 2: Why do you feel that PC control the the FPS genre? Why? Because they sell well, or because they play well?

The OP claimed that two generes plays better on PCs than consoles and such the PC will stay alive due to consoles inability to recreate a decent game within those genres. 

Question 3: So by now you've most likely written "Because they play better". So if the PC have more RPGs (MMORPGs alike), and controls that plays better within that genre. How come consoles have the upper hand?

Im not saying that Console RPGs like Fable etc would play better on PCs, or that the difference between PC RPGs and Console RPGs are as big as PC RTS and Console RTS. But i find it somewhat contradicting to say that something that within the RPG gener has a the bigger quantity of games aswell as quality, would be "inferior" to something that is second in just that. Dosen't add up. Even more so when you yourself said that FPS is a PC genre when Console FPS are far bigger and closer to PCs than Console RPGs.

I think many people are neglecting to see what makes PC gaming unique. While MMOs and RTS games are waaaaay better on PC, it has nothing to do with the platform itself, but everything to do with the improved control scheme provided by a KB and mouse. That said, why are all these publishers trying to dumb down RTS and MMO games to meet the limitations of a controller when modern gaming systems all feature USB ports that are more than capable of supporting a KB and mouse if the manufactureres decided to support them? Why can't you hook up a KB and mouse to play console FPS games if you so desire? I was sure that was something that we were going to see this gen, now I highly doubt it.

Should consoles ever start supporting KB and mouse contol, then PC gaming's future will really become uncertain imo. But until then, most hardcore MMO, RTS and yes, FPS gamers will always chose a PC as the platform of choice when a game is released with a PC option.

Tohose millins of others gave up just too much when they gave up their KBMs. Console FPSes are just like consoles RTS when compared to their PC counterparts. Whichever way you spin it, they are just a simplified experience.

I would say I contradicted myself, but simply by saying one word wrong.  Instead of saying 'control', I should have said PC has better 'support' of FPS.  Though obviously, as you said, FPS on consoles are selling much better.  But since many of the FPS are being developed for both PC and then being put on the consoles at the same time (same game for both platforms), that's kind of the reason FPS are still more of a PC genre.  Not to mention many of the biggest FPS developers develop mostly PC games.

Also, both the genres the OP stated can and have been made on consoles well.  I don't think games like FFXI, Phantasy Star Online or Monster Hunter Tri lack anything that makes them a viable MMO.  RTS however can be debated as being better played on a PC, though there are console games which have used the setup, such as Pikmin and Little King's Story.  And put their very own spin on it.

But no matter how you slice it, whether you're looking at RPGs by their sales, 'support' or just plain number of titles released, consoles outnumber PC RPGs.  Its been that way ever since the mid 90s.  Heck, even the major innovators and game series which STARTED RPGs on PC (games like Wizardry and Ultima) moved to consoles in the mid 90s, mostly to increase their sales as the PC market is just smaller than that of the console market.  So unless you take into account those small, independantly developed PC RPGs, then console RPGs outnumber them.

All the systems last gen, from XBOX to PS2 to even GC and Dreamcast (mostly for Phantasy Star Online) had a keyboard and mouse imput.  It didn't help sell specific games any and the peripherals themselves weren't utilized much.  Console gamers who play online games are playing online games for social interaction and coop play.  While PC gamers are playing the online games with more variables to think about.

In other words, less is more when designing a console game, even an RTS or MMO.  Whereas PC gamers tend to want all that extra stuff.

It was a 360 exclusive for the first year of its life and was only ported over because of its massive success on the 360.

That was a tiny list, there have been many many more games all released on xbla and all being greatly profitable. You don't seem to understand what an independent developer is. Who cares if they made games on the pc before, I don't see castle crashers or splosion man or undertow on another system do you? I made a game with zombies in it was released on XNA not xbla, which in case you forgot allows anyone in their homes to make a game for the 360. Just admit that your original statement was you just talking out of your ass and stop digging yourself into a deeper hole.

You seem to think that because someone made freeware for the PC before they started making games for the 360 that means their not an independent developer. If you don't understand how stupid that train of thought is I don't know what to say.