CaseyDDR said:
Barozi said: I heard that Vista is usually about 3 FPS faster and in certain (rare) cases even more than 15 FPS faster. However I have no problem running any game on the highest possible settings (well except for Crysis) so I don't care about 3 FPS more or less. |
Well the reason I don't like 7 is because IT IS Vista. It's Microsoft's way of repackaging it to get rid of the tainted name of Vista, and all they really did was change the start bar, which I don't like one bit. I don't notice any performance increase, faster loading, etc, my pc was already fast at all that.
|
well i'm fine with 7. i like vista and 7 over xp. and yea i dont' notice any difference in speed at all, was super fast before with xp, super fast with vista, adn still super fast with 7.
there are a couple of thijgs i like with 7.
1. the drag window to side, and another window to other side for doing two things. Its just nice and quick instead of having to size them yourself.
2. in same sense you just drag to top and it maximizes, and drag down to size before. (sure buttons on top right do that, but getting used to the dragging thing due to #1.
3. the shuffle of many wallpapers you can have. its like having a slideshow/screensaver on at all times while still doing stuff.
and yea for games i guess its supposed to be like 3-5 fps faster or something, but hell games are faster on my comp than any console games fps anyway so who cares abotu 3 fps. But I have noticed that there is a less memory leak with 7. I usedto have to worry abotu saving quite often in vista due to potential game closing due to memory leak. But now it never happens. THere is still some memory leak, but all it does is slow the game down a bit to make it laggy, so i just save, close and restart. Takes like 2 minutes to do, kind of annoying still, but only have to do it once every couple hours. which in that sense it most of the time leaves me to take a break or quit for the day. so its almost a good thing, so i dont'get stuck gaming for tooo long.