When you hit it big on a given platform, the past tends to get ignored.  In the case of Blizzard, I just wish they would do console stuff.  I am not about to drop money on a gaming PC at this point.  PCs have too few games, and the cost of the rigs are too much.

Dude let the thread die this is the reason why people dont like valve like cgi and others are saying.
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=155309
that answers the thread to the T.

So, every time Valve says yet another thing about the PS3, we will get more threads like this on here?

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=91539&page=1

maybe valve just does not have the talent, most good developers look for the challenge, when the game is done and its a great one, as a developer you feel very good, valve just does not have the talent to develop for the ps3, instead of being real about it, they use bull shit excusses and insult a console and the people playing on it, for me valve does not make anything i have to have , lsft for dead is good but many many better shooters out there, so screw em

i read somewhere postal wasn't theirs either.

Portol was AMAZING. Something new and fresh. Team Fortress 2 was also incredible. Half life even today is one of the greats. Although I don't think they did anything amazing or new with half life since half life 2. Left 4 dead though, was a title that made me feel ripped off. Yes, it was fun. A good deal of fun actually. But there wasn't enough content for the purchase price which was made worse by the fact that they didn't support it like they said they would. I played the Left 4 Dead 2 demo though and me and my girlfreind agreed that it just wasn't very good. In a years time, we changed out minds. Too many incredible games have come out to play a lazy game. And that's what valve's games are too me now. And I realized it just a couple nights ago playing the demo and is the reason they won't make a ps3 game. They are lazy. They are using the same engine from last gen and not doing as much as I think they should or can to push out an amazing, incredible game that pushes the boundries. I know they can do better and I expect it. If they want to go the easy route all the time, I won't buy. They should get off their lazy assess and do the best job they can to actually push boundaries and make incredible games.

The op in that thread was laughably bad. But I hope you don't think that some awful blogs and stupid people actually make the rediculous comments Valve has made ok. This just in, Osama Ben Ladin blowing up the twin towers was ok, because we went to Iraq.

Or they are a private studio that has enough projects and does not want to expand? It's ps3 fanboys that are the only ones that are going crazy off this, and they were never the market to begin with. The only reason the 360 gets the games is because it is close enough to a PC that it does not take much effort. The thing I don't get about this post, and maybe it is just a joke post cause I don't think this shit can be serious, is how you can claim that no one has talent because they don't want to develop for ps3.

And 10:1 the only reason they are saying this shit is because the journalists are asking the questions to get responses.

...

What?

I LOVE Valve...I remember when they first launched Steam, and some were skeptical...look at it now! As for their development...it's there business...EVERYBODY knows they aren't itnerested in making the investment to spread out, but stupid interviewers keep asking them the same question...I'd tell people to fuck off, but that's just me.