By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - The vgchartz ranking game--The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princes!

Also, according by the rules, only the people who have played a good portion of the game are entitled to give it a ranking? I seriously doubt that infinity has played even 5 minutes of the game. I may be wrong here, but until i'm proven the contrary, i'll stand in by my line of thought, especially since he stated the gameplay part.



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"

Around the Network
Boutros said:
lestatdark said:

@infinity

Care to elaborate more on your opinion that a Zelda game has terrible gameplay? That's one of the oddest things i've ever heard.

I agree with the bad gameplay actually. It really was bad. The controls with the Wii remote were just plain not responsive.

Tell that to Rol. He is on his 11th playthrough.

I played it 3 times myself, and i never experienced the issues that you are.



angrypoolman said:
Yo, John, are we counting infinity's score since he didn't go into great detail about why he is giving it a 5?

Yes he will count it.



lestatdark said:
Also, according by the rules, only the people who have played a good portion of the game are entitled to give it a ranking? I seriously doubt that infinity has played even 5 minutes of the game. I may be wrong here, but until i'm proven the contrary, i'll stand in by my line of thought, especially since he stated the gameplay part.

I looked through his game collection, and it is all mostly Sony. I saw that he gave CoD4 and SMG a 3, and I have found no evidence that he has even touched either of those games.



angrypoolman said:
Boutros said:
lestatdark said:

@infinity

Care to elaborate more on your opinion that a Zelda game has terrible gameplay? That's one of the oddest things i've ever heard.

I agree with the bad gameplay actually. It really was bad. The controls with the Wii remote were just plain not responsive.

Tell that to Rol. He is on his 11th playthrough.

I played it 3 times myself, and i never experienced the issues that you are.

Well I guess you don't mind bad controls...



Around the Network
Boutros said:
angrypoolman said:
Yo, John, are we counting infinity's score since he didn't go into great detail about why he is giving it a 5?

Yes he will count it.

It isn't following the rules and he seems to be doing this in every thread now. I can personally understand not liking a game but it seems he is doing it for pure fun.

If this appears in other threads that this individual is doing the same thing over and over again in threads for certain console he doesn't appear to own or games he doesn't actually own. i think he should be excused



 

@Boutros

I can relate to having some difficulty adjusting to the controls of the Wii, but controls and gameplay are two different things, even he did that separation. Gameplay emcompases everything from the sword fights, to riding Epona, to fishing, to lifting a jar, to swimming, etc,etc.
We're talking about a Zelda game here, not a run-of-the-mill adventure game, that's why i'm asking him to elaborate on that opinion, because I want to know which of those parts were that terrible



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"

lestatdark said:
Also, according by the rules, only the people who have played a good portion of the game are entitled to give it a ranking? I seriously doubt that infinity has played even 5 minutes of the game. I may be wrong here, but until i'm proven the contrary, i'll stand in by my line of thought, especially since he stated the gameplay part.

Its  john's decision and he didn't mention if he had a limited amount of playtime so I see no reason his vote wouldn't be counted. He gave a vote and an explanation which has been enough in other voting threads.. I see no reason why his shouldn't be counted.



I'm not martin luther king. I don't have a dream. I have a plan

Sell a man a fish you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish you just ruined a perfect business opportunity.

We didn't emerge out of the stone age because we ran out of stones. Its time to be proactive not reactive.

Acevil said:
Boutros said:
angrypoolman said:
Yo, John, are we counting infinity's score since he didn't go into great detail about why he is giving it a 5?

Yes he will count it.

It isn't following the rules and he seems to be doing this in every thread now. I can personally understand not liking a game but it seems he is doing it for pure fun.

4. If you score a game under a 5, you have to go into great detail as to why you gave it such a low score.

 

He's just smart you see.



lestatdark said:
@Boutros

I can relate to having some difficulty adjusting to the controls of the Wii, but controls and gameplay are two different things, even he did that separation. Gameplay emcompases everything from the sword fights, to riding Epona, to fishing, to lifting a jar, to swimming, etc,etc.
We're talking about a Zelda game here, not a run-of-the-mill adventure game, that's why i'm asking him to elaborate on that opinion, because I want to know which of those parts were that terrible

Sword fights were horrible for me and I guess it's kind of similar with him.