I played it, It's a horrible game. It's slightly worse than Star Ocean 4, and that was a travesty on the jrpg genre.

The review is valid. Do I need to post a picture of me playing it? It's my opinion, which is what a review is, and what this thread is about.

Unless you were not talking to me.

I was referring to A Bad Clown who said that, the game is not on his gamercard, so I'm assuming he hasn't played it.

my appologise, I was incredibly rude there for basically no reason what so ever.

That part about lack of japanise voices is funny :)

No worries dude, in fairness, he might've played the game, if that's the case, I retract my statement. Sorry you didn't like it much though.

Your usually rude regardless, reason or not...there was no need to go as far as posting a picture of your (or whoever elses') 360, or carrying on an argument with yourself (seeing as how "themanwithnoname" wasn't reffering to you in the first place).

the 1st game was utter shit. did you guys really expect the 2nd one to be significantly better? wait, did you even play the 1st game?

I pray this is a joke. I really do.

Someone stated I never had one, which was the first rude statement to make.

I Post a picture and wrote my name on a piece of paper to prove it.

The game isn't good, I am entitled to my opinion.

@outlawauron

In the past, games under and around 75 were awesome. But now adays reviews are skewed. Pretty much anything under 70 is what would get 0-20 in the past. Around 70 is the realm of shovelware, i mean seriously, go look at metacritic.

I dont agree with it, i feel 70 should be good, but it just USUALLY (not always) Isn't.

and people are missing up what mediocre means.

. of only ordinary or moderate quality; neither good nor bad; barely adequate.

I care because reviews like this prevents people from picking up a quality game.  And I dont play medicore games, I just have better tastes in games that you do.