By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - IGN's review of Magnacarta 2 is an utter joke

dsister44 on 15 October 2009

What is your XBL gamertag. And please taake a picture of your Xbox. All I see is a controller



Around the Network
Barozi on 15 October 2009
inverted3reality said:
Barozi said:
inverted3reality said:
Barozi said:
A Bad Clown said:
He didn't like it! Why do you care? If you like playing mediocre games to spend your time go buy it.

Metacritic disagrees with you

a... no it doesnt. under 80 = mediocre. under 70 = total shit. under 75 = pretty horrible.

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

 

You just won the award for "Most Spoiled Child"

The good thing is that physical age doesn't matter in this contest

what? I buy all my games myself. I'm 23 now, I'm just saying, games work on a 7-10 scale now. 7 being a 0, 10 being good.

More like:

6.5 = 5

7 = 6

8 = 7

8.5 = 8

9 = 9

10 =10



pbroy on 15 October 2009
inverted3reality said:
dsister44 said:
pbroy said:
inverted3reality said:
magna carta 2 is a pretty bad game. I dont see how this review is flawed.

And why didn't you like it?


Because it doesn't run in his PS3

 

then will it run in my 360 elite?

right click view image. thing is hiding for some reason.

That doesn't answer my question. Why did you think it was bad?

VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER
Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence
inverted3reality on 15 October 2009

right click, view image. my xbox is there.



inverted3reality on 15 October 2009

i thought the plot progressed in a really pathetic manner, i felt the characters were uninteresting and poorly developed. The combat was fun, but way too slow. it felt like a vastly inferior version of SO4.(which is already a horrible jrpg).

It lacked production value, the engine is ugly, and it just feels overall like a poor game. Which is sad due to the excellent art.



Around the Network
Seraphic_Sixaxis on 15 October 2009
d21lewis said:
From what I hear, the first one on the PS2 wasn't too stellar. I didn't expect much from this one, either. I just want a little HD titty wiggle. If it delivers on that, I'll ignore its shortcomings when I buy it.......used.......for $30.

Mhm, thankfully its a better game then this review implies. the really pretty girls are merely a bonus.



reaver_x on 15 October 2009
inverted3reality said:
Barozi said:
A Bad Clown said:
He didn't like it! Why do you care? If you like playing mediocre games to spend your time go buy it.

Metacritic disagrees with you

a... no it doesnt. under 80 = mediocre. under 70 = total shit. under 75 = pretty horrible.


ok umm u sir rate ur games wayyyyy too high. a 75 metacrtic is pretty good to me




 

 

                     

themanwithnoname on 16 October 2009

Can the people who haven't actually played the game, saying it's "mediocre," shut up please? Thanks!



themanwithnoname's law: As an America's sales or NPD thread grows longer, the probabilty of the comment "America = World" [sarcasticly] being made approaches 1.

inverted3reality on 16 October 2009

SO it's impossible for someone to play the game and find it mediocre? There's so much green spewing out of your mouth you're making me sick.



themanwithnoname on 16 October 2009
inverted3reality said:
SO it's impossible for someone to play the game and find it mediocre? There's so much green spewing out of your mouth you're making me sick.

Learn to read buddy.



themanwithnoname's law: As an America's sales or NPD thread grows longer, the probabilty of the comment "America = World" [sarcasticly] being made approaches 1.