AlkamistStar said:
inverted3reality said:
themanwithnoname said:
inverted3reality said:
I played it, It's a horrible game. It's slightly worse than Star Ocean 4, and that was a travesty on the jrpg genre.
The review is valid. Do I need to post a picture of me playing it? It's my opinion, which is what a review is, and what this thread is about.
Unless you were not talking to me. |
I was referring to A Bad Clown who said that, the game is not on his gamercard, so I'm assuming he hasn't played it.
|
my appologise, I was incredibly rude there for basically no reason what so ever.
|
Your usually rude regardless, reason or not...there was no need to go as far as posting a picture of your (or whoever elses') 360, or carrying on an argument with yourself (seeing as how "themanwithnoname" wasn't reffering to you in the first place).
|
Someone stated I never had one, which was the first rude statement to make.
I Post a picture and wrote my name on a piece of paper to prove it.
The game isn't good, I am entitled to my opinion.
@outlawauron
In the past, games under and around 75 were awesome. But now adays reviews are skewed. Pretty much anything under 70 is what would get 0-20 in the past. Around 70 is the realm of shovelware, i mean seriously, go look at metacritic.
I dont agree with it, i feel 70 should be good, but it just USUALLY (not always) Isn't.
and people are missing up what mediocre means.
. of only ordinary or moderate quality; neither good nor bad; barely adequate.
