By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - The vgchartz ranking game--Halo 3

i would give halo 3 a 10/10, for me its the best fps on a console period. awesome single player campiagn, mp is very fun and addicitive, co-op is some of the most fun i have had in a fps ever, love the ending and seeing the other ring leaves the ending open to start from that point or a little after for halo 4. i can respect ppl's opinion on giving halo 3 a score of 8 but anything lower than that would be obvious of being a fanboy of another platform.



GAMERTAG IS ANIMEHEAVEN X23

PSN ID IS : ANIMEREALM 

PROUD MEMBER OF THE RPG FAN CLUB THREAD

ALL-TIME FAVORITE JRPG IS : LOST ODYSSEY

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=52882&page=1

Around the Network

"tedsteriscool said:
Oh my...I knew this thread wouldn't end well. Calm down people...jesus. I'd give it a 9.1 for the multiplayer alone. Don't count my vote though as I'm a huge Sony bot."

You don't own a 360 do you?



 

Seece said:
"tedsteriscool said:
Oh my...I knew this thread wouldn't end well. Calm down people...jesus. I'd give it a 9.1 for the multiplayer alone. Don't count my vote though as I'm a huge Sony bot."

You don't own a 360 do you?

My brother does. I get to play it maybe once a week.



hsrob said:
Slimebeast said:
hsrob said:
Slimebeast said:

I just wanted to highlight that it's all fanboyism everywhere, sometimes open, sometimes in disguise.

Maybe stealth trolling is too strong of a word to describe it. And I never did. But still im trying to prove a point.

It can't be a coincidence that all the Sony biased members so far have given 8s?

KylieDog 8.0
CGI 8.5
FameMcSwagg 8.0
Aldro 8.0
Carl 8.9
Rick 8.2
Boutros 8.3
SciFiBoy 8.2
---------
Eight votes, Sony fan average = 8.27

If you believe there's no bias hidden in this, I think you're a very naive person.

I don't see how scores in the 8's can be considered evidence trolling or fanboyism.  The scores may be influenced by such but there is no way to prove it and in the end you end up standing there pointing accusingly at other members with no evidence to back you up.

Mario Galaxy was given and three and several 6's and 7's and they were counted, so I don't the point of pointing fingers at members who are entitled to give their opinion about the game.

OT: Haven't played so can't score it.

I didnt point out any individual, i pointed at the collective and I proved it through very solid statistics.

Well no, you name individual names, whether you stuck them in a group or named them one by one is irrelevant.

Furthermore, as someone pointed out already, Scifiboy i think, you misquoted his score and several other people in the group have refuted their position as Sony fans.  Solid statistics would involve getting the scores of all people in this thread who identify as Sony fans, not just the lowest ones you could lay your hands on. 

All that and your conclusion is based on the determination that a score below 9, is somehow invalid or must be influenced by fanboyism. Carl gave the game an 8.9(89), 5 marks below the Halo 3 meta of 94.  Similiary should we question the opinion of all those that gave a >9.9 or a >99%, because they are equidistant from the score that Halo 3 'deserves'.

People are entitled to their opinion.  You can question their opinion but you can't apply statistics to show that their opinion is somehow less valid. 

I can understand it's frustrating when someone can't see the quality in a game that you love or even people giving low scores to games that they have barely played but so far in all previous iterations of this thread, all scores have been included unless you could prove that the person hadn't played the game.

You have the right to disagree.



10/10 for me!



"...You can't kill ideas with a sword, and you can't sink belief structures with a broadside. You defeat them by making them change..."

- From By Schism Rent Asunder

Around the Network
tedsteriscool said:
Seece said:
"tedsteriscool said:
Oh my...I knew this thread wouldn't end well. Calm down people...jesus. I'd give it a 9.1 for the multiplayer alone. Don't count my vote though as I'm a huge Sony bot."

You don't own a 360 do you?

My brother does. I get to play it maybe once a week.

Ah ok cool



 

Slimebeast said:
hsrob said:
Slimebeast said:
hsrob said:
Slimebeast said:

I just wanted to highlight that it's all fanboyism everywhere, sometimes open, sometimes in disguise.

Maybe stealth trolling is too strong of a word to describe it. And I never did. But still im trying to prove a point.

It can't be a coincidence that all the Sony biased members so far have given 8s?

KylieDog 8.0
CGI 8.5
FameMcSwagg 8.0
Aldro 8.0
Carl 8.9
Rick 8.2
Boutros 8.3
SciFiBoy 8.2
---------
Eight votes, Sony fan average = 8.27

If you believe there's no bias hidden in this, I think you're a very naive person.

I don't see how scores in the 8's can be considered evidence trolling or fanboyism.  The scores may be influenced by such but there is no way to prove it and in the end you end up standing there pointing accusingly at other members with no evidence to back you up.

Mario Galaxy was given and three and several 6's and 7's and they were counted, so I don't the point of pointing fingers at members who are entitled to give their opinion about the game.

OT: Haven't played so can't score it.

I didnt point out any individual, i pointed at the collective and I proved it through very solid statistics.

Well no, you name individual names, whether you stuck them in a group or named them one by one is irrelevant.

Furthermore, as someone pointed out already, Scifiboy i think, you misquoted his score and several other people in the group have refuted their position as Sony fans.  Solid statistics would involve getting the scores of all people in this thread who identify as Sony fans, not just the lowest ones you could lay your hands on. 

All that and your conclusion is based on the determination that a score below 9, is somehow invalid or must be influenced by fanboyism. Carl gave the game an 8.9(89), 5 marks below the Halo 3 meta of 94.  Similiary should we question the opinion of all those that gave a >9.9 or a >99%, because they are equidistant from the score that Halo 3 'deserves'.

People are entitled to their opinion.  You can question their opinion but you can't apply statistics to show that their opinion is somehow less valid. 

I can understand it's frustrating when someone can't see the quality in a game that you love or even people giving low scores to games that they have barely played but so far in all previous iterations of this thread, all scores have been included unless you could prove that the person hadn't played the game.

You have the right to disagree.

As do they, about the quality of the game.



@ Slimebeast

I get you man, but CGi and Carl's votes were pretty decent, Kyliedog is in no way a Sony fanboy. Can't speak for the rest but the only dud score I see is Aldro.



 

I'm almost afraid to post my opinion of the game, because I know I'm going to be getting attacked by an army of 360 fans for it. Let me just say, that I have owned a 360 for quite some time, longer then any next gen console. I Originally purchased the 20 GB hard drive model when Dead Rising released (that day, I can't remember when that was though) in addition with Dead Rising, Oblivion and I believe GRAW. I loved it. The graphics and capabilities blew away anything else that came before it. However, soon I became sour toward the system. After recieving the red ring of death (twice) and after having never have any console of mine ever break on me, I of course became upset with microsoft. Later after having bought a PS3 and wii I became even more upset when I realised how ripped off I had been when having to pay for online and a $100 wifi adapter which both of the other systems gave me at no additional costs. And in addition to that, the microsoft points system which only exists to get more money from the consumer. How could I not become sour? All of these things were absolutely microsoft's fault and after recieving a console like the ps3, which to me was a huge improvement in every possible way to that of the 360 and it should be to no surprise that I have become a huge supporter of the ps3. Now, I'm only being honest here. However, I do want to add that even though I hate my 360, I absolutely love the software that is on it no matter if microsoft made it or not. I'm a very huge Gears of War fan and if you notice I buy quite a few 360 exclusives each year. Any game at all that I am interested in I buy, and if it's good, I love it. And now, a little history about me and Halo. Before Halo 3, I had never owned an xbox and never had any close friends who owned an xbox. I did however hear about Halo and what it was and I was very interested in it. I almost bought an xbox just for Halo and Knights of the Old republic but never could bring myself to do it. However, after buying a 360 (and another after the first broke) I couldn't wait to get a chance to play the master of all shooters. It wasn't until this generation that I even began to play shooters, before I was almost exclusively an JRPG player, a genre that now I am not too fond of. Now, shooters are by far my favorite genre, but this was when I was first getting into the genre and I was thrilled for halo 3. So much that I preorder, bought and still have sitting in my room collecting dust the Legendary Edition of the game. Now all of this being said, I am going to give my HONEST opinion of the game and will give a link showing that I have owned the game since launch (well, I played online for the first time after beating the campeign and playing offline with friends first) and have played many games online (mostly because of friends though).

http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Halo3/Default.aspx?player=solid+raiden&sg=0

+ Four Player Co-op

+ Generally good online play

+ Cinema mode was a great addition

+ good enemy AI

- bad single player component. Even four player co-op didn't make it fun. I'd rather play online vs rather then ever play this crappy campeign again.

-bad friendly AI. Most apparent in driving sections

-bad graphics. Low resolution. Horrendous character models. Many enemies deserved to be in a kids cartoon not a serious mature shooter.

- The camera always staying perfectly still no matter if your running, moving, jumping. Anything. It has absolutely no weight ar anything to it. I hate this. I'm not asking for anything like Killzone either, just even like COD4 how the camera shakes when your running. Anything. I hate the arcadey feel.

- None of the guns, other then the shotguns feel satisfying to shoot.

-Overall, gameply is not amazing. Too arcadey. IMO shooters have grown and advanced and Halo is stuck in the past.

-They stole the head crabs from Half-Life and called them the flood.

7.5




PS3 Trophies

 

 

Did the original Half-Life have head crabs?