why shouldnt the score count?? because it didnt by into the hype...i guarantee if they gave it a 11/10 we'd be askin why isnt it in META

  hmm the site is in a partnership with another site which gave the game another score, and they also didnt test the multiplayer aspect of the game.... Thus the score is not viable imo.

Im guessing these are the reasons.

1. They are a nobody site

2. http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?id=2658894

3. The average from 24 reviews, is currently 97. This review, from a unknown site, is 27 points below that average, which includes several of the internets biggest gaming sites.

4. Even Crazzyman disagree's, and we all know how much he loved to hate on the PS3. (9 Posts down) http://www.n4g.com/ps3/NewsCom-403174.aspx?CT=1

This happens guys. Unfortunately. There are still about 30 reviews to be added to Uncharted 2 on Metacritic. As I believe only 22 has been done so far. Normally they finish with around 50-70.

ODST also had pathetic reviews, which after playing obviously shows the reviewer actually never played it.

The 7/10 is stupid. Where he lost me is when he ripped on the "videogame moments" and how things got "unrealistic." It's a popcorn movie game... the first one had ZOMBIES... to complain that it's a flaw that an Uncharted games has unrealistic elements and supernatural stuff is like complaining that Halo takes place on a different planet, it's a staple of the franchise, and you should know what type of stuff you're getting going in.

Yea, and I'm sure that 1.5/5 review for Halo ODST should count too. No. Because it was a bs review. And do you know how you tell a bs review? When it is far from the average reviews for a game. 70 is pretty far away from the 97 Uncharted 2 is sitting at now. Some people are obviously just biased for one reason or another.

Norway, haha.

Im from sweden so we always laugh. Dont care becuase lack of skills. They need to play more games.

this.

1) Don't just read the pretty number, look at the review. If it can be called that. You know, those words that come before the number

2) If they gave it an 11/10 with this review, people would be thinking "WTF?", and if they had a positive review, yes, people would praise it, but they wouldn't ask why it isn't in meta.

3) It's not on Metacritic's list. Metacritic will allow any site run by a five year old and his pet cat into their database.

4) History of their reviews being anti-Sony

5) They're clearly wrong. If it's their opinion, their opinion is wrong. Just because it's an opinion doesn't mean it has to be right- if somebody was of the opinion that Hitler was a hero and should be worshipped, would you allow them to say so because "it's their opinion"? Extreme example, of course, but those are the best kind of examples.

Lol, if they found Uncharted too difficult, they'll play Demon's Souls for five minutes and jump out of a window.