@dtewi

THAT WAS MY WHOLE POINT, it was a response to soriku who said that history can prove the future, the question was meant to be meaningless.

Yes Soriku because he's part of the family.

And that arguement is stupid.

Doesn't matter why they put it... all that mattes is that it is there.

SE put it on the PS3 and it might get ported

That chance is extremely small. There are rumors that have some substance that Sony are funding yet another game from S-E. Sony moneyhat just the same as Microsoft do.

@soriku

WTF was that last post about, that didnt even make sense or draw any parallels to what we were saying.

Mark my words:

" PS3 will end up winning this console war"

I want to be the vgchartz patchter!!

Strange thing is he has been correct about ALL of his nex gen analysis, he says sony will end up with the most market share by 2011.

FFXIII doesn't mean success.


That is basically like saying if a football team is undefeated every 1st week in history doesn't mean they'll win next year.

And past history of FF can't prove success.

Patchter also says a WiiHD.


That won't happen.

yeah FFXIII doesnt mean success just a massive sales spike in Japan... and the rest of the world come to think of it. But it wont spur sales on 6 months after it has released, what you really need to win a generation is a constant supply of SH&T games so the games library appears massive, look at the PS2.

 Really? Proof?

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/26392.html

Watch all of it!

Patchter was correct about, the

"micro$oft wont cut price until sony"

"Sony wont go anywhere without a huge price drop, but Im just expecting a $100 price cut"

"Sony will release a 40gb ps3 before christmas"