disolitude said:
Akvod said:
disolitude said:
DaBuddahN said: Totally buying this over Modern Warfare 2. |
You will be one of 15 people that will buy MAG instead of MW2. Most PS3 owners interested in realistic shooters will buy both
|
I'm not buying MW2... and it's not because I'm a fanboy, because the other FPS I'm looking at is multiplat (along with MAG).
Why the fuck should we just automatically buy a game?
|
You dont have to buy it...you can rent it. :)
Look, like it or not COD MW2 is going to be the best FPS of the year. You may as well see what its about... Im not a big fan of part 1's multiplayer and prolly won even play the MP in MW2 much...but damn, i will have to see this monster when its finished.
|
O.o??????????????
And I don't really see the point in renting a multiplayer centric FPS unless I'm planing to play it... in which case Activision should have done a free demo session like EA did. Even with the huge lag in the Battlefield demo I was still able to see and get the basic foundation of the gameplay which centered on big open maps, with buildings to serve as cover, which you counter by your ability to destroy the environment and vehicles (tanks, boats, choppers, etc).
It's a bit annoying when you have a team that lacks snipers though >.< If you get any team that even has one organized squad, or has a spam load of decent snipers while you have none to counter, you're fucked.
That's why MAG interests me. Out of the 256 players there has to be at least some snipers. You have a HUGE map, so I can definetly sneak through. The game gives incentives for you to work as a team (points). And if the commander is the one who issues those point rewarded orders then that'll be hella awesome and makes me want to try being a commander.