Akvod said:
O.o?????????????? And I don't really see the point in renting a multiplayer centric FPS unless I'm planing to play it... in which case Activision should have done a free demo session like EA did. Even with the huge lag in the Battlefield demo I was still able to see and get the basic foundation of the gameplay which centered on big open maps, with buildings to serve as cover, which you counter by your ability to destroy the environment and vehicles (tanks, boats, choppers, etc).
It's a bit annoying when you have a team that lacks snipers though >.< If you get any team that even has one organized squad, or has a spam load of decent snipers while you have none to counter, you're fucked. That's why MAG interests me. Out of the 256 players there has to be at least some snipers. You have a HUGE map, so I can definetly sneak through. The game gives incentives for you to work as a team (points). And if the commander is the one who issues those point rewarded orders then that'll be hella awesome and makes me want to try being a commander. |
Think of it this way...I'll prolly rent MW2 to see what its about. ITs a game that will spew many fanboy kisses and disses... I may as well know what people are talking about on these forums about the game.
But I agree that MP is prolly not the best out there. Looks like the only 2 new things MW2 is bringing to the MP table are vehicles and sticky grenades... and Halo called and wants its ideas back. :)
