famousringo said:
JUG said: After reading that interview, you can consider me officially hyped for this! |
That's just the half that has been updated. If you click the link, Vandenberghe has a lot of other interesting things to say about the importance of 60FPS (I could hug him, even though he looks like a dirty biker), the thinking behind that kickass intro sequence... tons more.
I'm not sure why so many people are allowing the first Red Steel to cloud their judgement of this game. A sword, a gun, and a Wii are about the only things the two games have in common. The gameplay is new, the character is new, the art is new, the engine is new.
Must be a bummer to be so skeptical all the time.
|
Exactly why it should not be called Red Steel 2,it has nothing to do with the first (not even blood which the title of the first was implying) So if it has NOTHING to do with the first why connect the two with the title.
No one better try the "sold 1 million" argument because well I helped sell the wii and red steel at launch,only reason it sold but that game and far cry were the most returned/Traded in games. Had so many we had to ship extras to other stores and we still had ten or more in the drawer and 6 on the shelf of a used game. Everytime someone bought it used it came back the next day.
Sometime later Ubi made a public apology for Red Steel and far Cry...then gave us PetZ and Z games.
Ubisoft is marketing this similar to the first with bullshot trailers and such and giving many promises.
I have a hard time trusting what they say,but as I said in the other post I WANT this to be good and this time hope it holds up.
The concept is awesome.