What this shows is that Sony and Nintendo live or die due to their gaming division performance. For MSFT, it's a sidequest which they chose to complete for an extra achievement.

I don't know if you have heard but Sony is producing few other things like blue ray/dvd players, tvs, hi-fi, computers, mp3 players etc.

The only company which is 100% dependant on games division is Nintendo.

By the end of their fiscal year, Sony reported about 1 billion in losses. 600 million of these came from their gaming division which is a majority.

Wait what the deuce does all this mean? Does revenue mirror profitability?

OT: I don't see how this is possible. Nintendo's two consoles and games sell more than Sony games, three consoles, TVs, computers, phones, music players, headphones, cameras, speakers...

Because SCE doesn't make TVs, computers, phones, music players, headphones, cameras, speakers... or your momma love you.

Which would prove your claim flase (or backwards). If Sony is losing money from the game division, then it's not their life blood. It's the wound that's killing them. In this case, Sony's profits depends a lot more on how much money the game division is/isn't pissing away.

He means Nintendo is bigger than all of Sony, not just SCE, which is true.

I don't think Nintendo needs the hardware sales to surpass what Sony is doing (in the game industry). Just look at the sales for Nintendogs, Mario Kart wii, Mario Kart DS, Wii Fit, Wii sports, New Super Mario Bros, etc.

hmm, looks like everybody took in decent numbers, now les just and we see what they lost and determine what they have