I say none of them do because they're all flawed and there are better FPS out there, the first Halo is probably AA at best but Halo 2 and 3 don't even deserve a single A.
I say none of them do because they're all flawed and there are better FPS out there, the first Halo is probably AA at best but Halo 2 and 3 don't even deserve a single A.
You seem pretty obsessed with this subject. Show me on leo-j where Halo touched you.
The first for Innovation, the second and third for high production value.
Bet with Dr.A.Peter.Nintendo that Super Mario Galaxy 2 won't sell 15 million copies up to six months after it's release, the winner will get Avatar control for a week and signature control for a month.
kiefer23 said: *Face Palm* |
Please answer my question.
Yes... all 3 of them do. That doesn't make them the best shooters ever but they are all 3 very well made games.
Yes, they all deserve AAA status.
if u take only the multiplayer part maybe.
but story it should get even a 6.
What an absurd, blatant troll thread. Of course, all three of them do. In fact, if I was a Sony fan, I'd go out of my way to point out that they are AAA titles. If Halo 3, as you state, isn't even a single A game, then you're a fanboy of a company who can't make a single game with half the sales of a single A Xbox title. Run along.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.