SciFiBoy said:can someone explain to me:
1) why we arent stopping the taliban? 2) how many years will it take to stop them, if indeed we can stop them? 3) how many civilians and troops need to die to stop them 4) if the taliban cant be defeated, why are we there? 5) do the taliban pose a direct thread to the UK and/or US? |
1) We were stopping the Taliban. Their numbers and operational capabilities have decreased significantly since the initial invasion in 2001. However, this opportunity was squandered by the Bush administration. The attention and resources necessary for disrupting the Taliban's operational capabilities were lacking. That is why progress has been slow or (possibly) nonexistent.
2) This is difficult to answer. The success in Afghanistan is dependent on the success of the Pakistani government's operations against the TTP (Taliban in Pakistan) and related groups. Also, there is a distinct possibility of President Obama further increasing the number of troops and resources in the operation. This would affect any estimation.
3) If the 2nd question was difficult to answer, this one is impossible.
4) If the definition of victory is to eradicate every Taliban fighter, then they will never be defeated. However, that is not the goal of the operation. One of the goals is to disrupt the operations of the Taliban and render them virtually incapable of operating as a cohesive group. The other goal is to provide the government of Afghanistan time to establish itself before it is solely responsible for combating the Taliban. Those goals are achievable. That is why we are there.
5) They are not a threat as of now. If coalition forces were to leave the area, the Taliban's goal would be to consolidate their power and strengthen their operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan. If this were to happen, then a situation similar to or worse than the situation prior to the invasion would result. That would be (potentially) threatening to the US and/or the UK.